Memory conjunction errors for realistic faces are consistent with configural processing

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 106-111

  McKone, Elinor ^a,b   Peh, Yu Xi ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748798743     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193820     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. BUXBAUM, L. J., GLOSSER, G., & COSLETT, H. B. (1999). Impaired face and word recognition without object agnosia. Neuropsychologia, 37, 41-50.
2. CLARK, S. E., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1992). Cuing effects and associative information in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 20, 580-598.
3. COHEN, J. D., MACWHINNEY, B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
4. COHEN, L. B., & CASHON, C. H. (2001). Do 7-month-old infants process independent features or facial configurations? Infant & Child Development, 10, 83-92.
5. HANNIGAN, S. L., & REINITZ, M. T. (2000). Influences of temporal factors on memory conjunction errors. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14,309-321.
6. JONES, T. C., & JACOBY, L. L. (2001). Feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory: Evidence for dual-process theory. Journal of Memory & Language, 45, 82-102.
7. KANWISHER, N., MCDERMOTT, J., & CHUN, M. M. ( 1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17,4302-4311.
8. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. MAURER, D., LE GRAND, R., & MONDLOCH, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configurai processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255-260.
10. MOSCOVITCH, M., WINOCUR, G., & BEHRMANN, M. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 555-604.
11. REINITZ, M. T., & HANNIGAN, S. L. (2001). Effects of simultaneous presentation and attention switching on memory conjunction errors. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 206-219.
12. REINITZ, M. T., LAMMERS, W. J., & COCHRAN, B. P. (1992). Memoryconjunction errors: Miscombination of stored stimulus features can produce illusions of memory. Memory & Cognition, 20, 1-11.
13. RUBIN, S. R., VAN PETTEN, C., GLISKY, E. L., & NEWBERG, W. M. (l999). Memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Event-related potential and neuropsychological data. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16,459-488.
14. SEARCY, J. H., BARTLETT, J. C., & MEMON, A. (1999). Age differences in accuracy and choosing in eyewitness identification and face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 27, 538-552.
15. TANAKA, J. W., & FARAH, M. J. ( 1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
16. TONG, E, & NAKAYAMA, K. (1999). Harvard Vision Lab Face Database. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Vision Lab.
17. WENGER, M. J., & INGVALSON, E. M. (2002). A decisional component of holistic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 872-892.
18. YOUNG, A. W., HELLAWELL, D., & HAY, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.