Foot-and-mouth disease virus: A first inter-laboratory comparison trial to evaluate virus isolation and RT-PCR detection methods

Veterinary Microbiology

Volumn 117, Issue 2-4, 2006, Pages 130-140

  Ferris, N P ^a   King, D P ^a   Reid, S M ^a   Hutchings, G H ^a   Shaw, A E ^a   Paton, D J ^a   Goris, N ^b   Haas, B ^c   Hoffmann, B ^c   Brocchi, E ^d   Bugnetti, M ^d   Dekker, A ^e   De Clercq, K ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ANIMAL HEALTH   (United Kingdom)

^b VETERINARY AND AGROCHEMICAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Belgium)

^c FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR ANIMAL HEALTH   (Germany)

^d ISTITUTO ZOOPROFILATTICO SPERIMENTALE DELLA LOMBARDIA E DELL EMILIA ROMAGNA   (Italy)

^e WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cell culture; Diagnosis; Foot and mouth disease virus; Ring test; RT PCR; Virus detection

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DILUTION; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; EPITHELIUM; EVALUATION; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; INOCULATION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; NONHUMAN; QUALITY CONTROL; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SAMPLE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINE DISEASE; VIRUS IDENTIFICATION; VIRUS ISOLATION; VIRUS TITRATION;

ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; LABORATORY TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINE; TIME FACTORS; VIRUS CULTIVATION;

FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS - TYPE A; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 33748788597     PISSN: 03781135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahl R. Inhibitors of foot-and-mouth disease virus. I. Effect of EDTA, temperature, and interferon on the viral growth cycle. Arch. Ges. Virusforsch. 46 (1974) 302-314
2. Anon., 2003. Report of the Session of the Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease. Gerzensee, Berne, Switzerland, 16-19 September 2003, p. 11.
3. Brocchi, E., Capucci, L., De Simone, F., Panina, G.F., 1986. Potential of Monoclonal Antibodies (Mabs) for FMD Diagnosis and Characterisation of the Isolates. Report of the Session of the Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Madrid, Spain, 14-17 October 2003, pp. 30-31 (Appendix 5).
4. Callahan J.D., Brown F., Osorio F.A., Sur J.H., Kramer E., Long G.W., Lubroth J., Ellis S.J., Shoulars K.S., Gaffney K.L., Rock D.L., and Nelson W.M. Use of a portable real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 220 (2002) 1636-1642
5. Callens M., and De Clercq K. Differentiation of the seven serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. J. Virol. Methods 67 (1997) 35-44
6. De Castro M.P. Behaviour of the foot-and-mouth disease virus in cell cultures: susceptibility of the IB-RS-2 cell line. Arch. Inst. Biol. São Paulo 31 (1964) 63-78
7. Dinka S.K., Swaney L.M., and McVicar J.W. Selection of a stable clone of MVPK-1 fetal porcine kidney cell for assays of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Can. J. Microbiol. 23 (1977) 295-299
8. Ferris N.P., and Dawson M. Routine application of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in comparison with complement fixation for the diagnosis of foot-and-mouth and swine vesicular diseases. Vet. Microbiol. 16 (1988) 201-209
9. Goris N., and De Clercq K. Quality assurance/quality control of foot-and-mouth disease solid phase competition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-Part II. Quality control: comparison of two charting methods to monitor assay performance. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 24 (2005) 1005-1016
10. Jacobson R.H. Validation of serological assays for diagnosis of infectious diseases. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 17 (1998) 469-486
11. Kasza L., Shadduck J.A., and Christofinis G.J. Establishment, viral susceptibility and biological characteristics of a swine kidney cell line SK-6. Res. Vet. Sci. 13 (1972) 46-51
12. King D.P., Ferris N.P., Shaw A.E., Reid S.M., Hutchings G.H., Giuffe A.C., Robida J.M., Callahan J.D., Nelson W.M., and Beckham T.R. Detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus: comparative diagnostic sensitivity of two independent real-time RT-PCR assays. J. Vet. Diag. Invest 18 (2006) 93-97
13. McPherson I.A., and Stoker M.G.P. Polyoma transformation of hamster cell clones-an investigation of genetic factors affecting cell competence. Virology 16 (1962) 147-151
14. Moonen P., Boostra J., Hakze-van der Honing R., Boonstra-Leendertse C., Jacobs L., and Dekker A. Validation of a LightCycler-based reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for the detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus. J. Virol. Methods 113 (2003) 35-41
15. Moss A., and Haas B. Comparison of the plaque test and reverse transcription nested PCR for the detection of FMDV in nasal swabs and probang samples. J. Virol. Methods 80 (1999) 59-67
16. Nunez J.I., Blanco E., Hernandez T., Gomez-Tejedor C., Martin M.J., Dopazo J., and Sobrino F. A RT-PCR assay for the differential diagnosis of vesicular viral diseases of swine. J. Virol. Methods 72 (1998) 227-235
17. Rasmussen T.B., Uttenthal A., de Stricker K., Belak S., and Storgaard T. Development of a novel quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of all serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Arch. Virol. 148 (2003) 2005-2021
18. Reid S.M., Ferris N.P., Hutchings G.H., Zhang Z., Belsham G.J., and Alexandersen S. Detection of all seven serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus by real-time, fluorogenic reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay. J. Virol. Methods 105 (2002) 67-80
19. Reid S.M., Grierson S.S., Ferris N.P., Hutchings G.H., and Alexandersen S. Evaluation of automated RT-PCR to accelerate the laboratory diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease virus. J. Virol. Methods 107 (2003) 129-139
20. Reid S.M., Ferris N.P., Hutchings G.H., King D.P., and Alexandersen S. Evaluation of real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of swine vesicular disease virus. J. Virol. Methods 116 (2004) 169-176
21. Rodriguez A., Martinez-Salas E., Dopazo J., Davila M., Saiz J.C., and Sobrino F. Primer design for specific diagnosis by PCR of highly variable RNA viruses: typing of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Virology 189 (1992) 363-367
22. Roeder P.L., and Le Blanc Smith P.M. Detection and typing of foot-and-mouth disease virus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: a sensitive, rapid and reliable technique for primary diagnosis. Res. Vet. Sci. 43 (1987) 225-232
23. Saiz M., de la Morena D.B., Blanco E., Nunez J.I., Fernandez R., Sanchez-Vizcaino J.M., and Vizcaino S. Detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus from culture and clinical samples by reverse transcription-PCR coupled to restriction enzyme and sequence analysis. Vet. Res. 34 (2003) 105-117
24. Shaw A.E., Reid S.M., King D.P., Hutchings G.H., and Ferris N.P. Enhanced laboratory diagnosis of foot and mouth disease by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 23 (2004) 1003-1009
25. Snowdon W.A. Growth of foot-and-mouth disease virus in monolayer cultures of calf thyroid cells. Nature 210 (1966) 1079-1080
26. Vangrysperre W., and De Clercq K. Rapid and sensitive polymerase chain reaction based detection and typing of foot-and-mouth disease virus in clinical samples and cell culture isolates, combined with a simultaneous differentiation with other genomically and/or symptomatically related viruses. Arch. Virol. 141 (1996) 331-344
27. Van Rijn P.A., Wellenberg G.J., Hakze-van der Honing R., Jacobs L., Moonen P.L.J.M., and Feitsma H. Detection of economically important viruses in boar semen by quantitative realtime PCR™ technology. J. Virol. Methods 120 (2004) 151-160