Revealing spatial genetic structure through cluster analyses

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 198, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 312-320

  Gregorius, Hans Rolf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Association; Autochthony; Cluster analysis; Covariation; Fragmentedness; Isolation; Metapopulation; Phylogeography; Spatiogenetic structure

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; GENES; GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS; MUTAGENESIS;

AUTOCHTHONY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COVARIATION; FRAGMENTEDNESS; METAPOPULATION; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SPATIOGENETIC STRUCTURE;

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; FRAGMENTATION; GENETIC STRUCTURE; METAPOPULATION; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY;

EID: 33748787698     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Avise J.C. Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species (2000), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, London
2. Bonnin I., Ronfort J., Wozniak F., and Olivieri I. Spatial effects and rare outcrossing events in Medicago truncatula (Fabaceae). Mol. Ecol. 10 (2001) 1371-1383
3. Epperson B.K. Spatial and space time correlations in ecological models. Ecol. Model. 132 (2000) 63-76
4. Estabrook G.F. A mathematical model in graph theory for biological classification. J. Theor. Biol. 12 (1966) 297-310
5. Gabriel K.R., and Sokal R.R. A new statistical approach to geographic variation analysis. Syst. Zool. 18 (1969) 259-278
6. Gathmann F.O., and Williams D.D. Inter-site: a new tool for the simulation of spatially realistic population dynamics. Ecol. Model. 113 (1998) 125-139
7. Gregorius H.-R. Measuring association between traits. Acta Biotheor. 46 (1998) 89-98
8. Gregorius H.-R. The isolation approach to hierarchical clustering. J. Classification 21 (2004) 51-69
9. Gregorius, H.-R. Single-linkage clustering obeys the isolation principle, submitted.
10. Gribble N.A. A spatially explicit multi-competitor coexistence model of penaeid (shrimp) distribution on the Australian Great Barrier Reef. Ecol. Model. 177 (2004) 61-74
11. Hennig W. Phylogenetic Systematics (1966), University of Illinois Press, Urbana
12. Heywood J.S. Spatial analysis of genetic variation in plant populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22 (1991) 335-355
13. Jardine N.J., and Sibson R. Mathematical Taxonomy (1971), John Wiley & Sons, London
14. Konnert M. Investigations on the genetic variation of beech (Fagus sylvatica L) in Bavaria. Silvae Genetica 44 5-6 (1995) 346-350
15. Linhart Y.B., and Grant M.C. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27 (1996) 237-277
16. Marshall H.D., Newton C., and Ritland K. Chloroplast phylogeography and evolution of highly polymorphic microsatellites in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta). Theor. Appl. Genet. 104 (2002) 376-378
17. Müller-Starck, R., 1996. Genetische Aspekte der Reproduktion der Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.) unter Berücksichtigung waldbaulicher Gegebenheiten. Ber. Forschungszentrum Waldökosysteme, Reihe A, Bd. 135, Göttingen.
18. Repsilber D., and Bialozyt F. Spatial genetic patterns systematically accelerate and bias drift-based genetic erosion. Ecol. Model. 148 (2002) 251-261
19. Schoppa F.N., and Gregorius H.-R. Is autochthony an operational concept?. In: Müller-Starck G., and Schubert R. (Eds). Genetic Response of Forest Systems to Changing Environmental Conditions (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 173-185
20. Templeton A.R. Statistical phylogeography: methods of evaluating and minimizing inference errors. Mol.-Ecol. 13 (2004) 789-809
21. Turok. J., 1995. Genetische Untersuchungen bei der Buche. Schriftenreihe der Landesanstalt für Ökologie, Bodenordnung und Forsten/Landesamt für Agrarordnung Nordrhein-Westfalen. Band 8, 136 pp.