Induced current Bio-impedance technique for monitoring bone mineral density-a simulation model

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1332-1342

  Katz, Sagie ^a   Zlochiver, Sharon ^a   Abboud, Shimon ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Biological volume conductor; Coil geometry; Correlation; Excitation current; Femur; Finite volume method; Permittivity; Surface potential; Thigh model

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL VOLUME CONDUCTORS; BONE MINERAL DENSITY (BMD); COIL GEOMETRY; EXCITATION CURRENTS; FEMUR; SURFACE POTENTIAL; THIGH MODEL;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC EXCITATION; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; PERMITTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

BONE;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENSITOMETRY; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENSITOMETRY; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE;

EID: 33748786260     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: 15739686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-006-9146-0     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abboud, S., Y. Eshel, S. Levy, and M. Rosenfeld, Numerical calculations of the potential distribution due to dipole sources in a spherical model of the head. Comput. Biomed. Res. 27:441-455, 1994.
2. Anderson, D. K., R. C. Tozer, and I. L. Freeston. Analytic solution of the forward problem for induced current electrical impedance tomography system. IEE Proc. Meas. Technol. 142(6):425-432, 1995.
3. Brown, J. P., and R. G. Josse. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ. 167(10 suppl):S1-S34, 2002.
4. Dinc, H., Y. Sadikoǧlu, G. Savci, A. Demirci, and E. Tuncel. Bone mineral density measurement by quantitative computed tomography in a normal turkish population. Eur J Radiol. 21:79-83, 1995.
5. Eyüboǧlu, B. M., A. Köksal. and M. Demirbilek. Distinguishability analysis of an induced current EIT system using discrete coils. Phys. Med. Biol. 45:1997-2009, 2000.
6. Freeston, I. L., and R. C. Tozer. Impedance imaging using induced currents. Physiol. Meets. 16:A257-A266, 1995.
7. Gencer, N. G., M. Kuzuoǧlu, and Y. Z. Ider. Electrical impedance tomography using induced currents. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 13:338-350, 1994.
8. Gencer, N. G., and Y. Z. Ider. A comparative study of several exciting magnetic fields for induced current EIT. Physiol. Meas. 15: A51-57, 1994.
9. Gencer, N. G., Y. Z. Ider, and S. J. Williamson. Electrical impedance tomography: induced-current imaging achieved with a multiple coil system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43:139-149, 1996.
10. Ghandi, O. P. Electromagnetic fields: Human safety issues. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 4:211-234, 2002.
11. Griffiths, H. The importance of phase measurement in electrical impedance tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 32:1435-1444, 1987.
12. Mirsky, E. C., and T. A. Einhorn. Current concept review - Bone densitometry in orthopaedic practice. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 80:1687-1698, 1998.
13. Nunez, P. L. Electric fields of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981, pp. 445-450.
14. Plonsey, R., and D. B. Happner. Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. Math. Biophys. 29:657-664, 1967.
15. Purvis, W. R., R. C. Tozer, D. K. Anderson, and I. L. Freeston. Induced current impedance imaging. Proc. IEEE 140:135-141, 1993.
16. Reddy, G. N., and S. Saha. Electrical and dielectric properties of wet bone as a function of frequency. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., BME-31(3):296-302, 1984.
17. Ruan, W., R. Guardo, and A. Adler. Experimental evaluation of two iterative reconstruction methods for induced current electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 15: 180-187, 1996.
18. Scaife, J. M., R. C. Tozer, and I. L. Freeston. Conductivity and permittivity images from an induced current electrical impedance tomography system. IEE Proc. Meas. Technol, 141(5):356-362, 1994.
19. Sierpowska, J., J. Töyräs, M. A. Hakulinen, S. Saarakkala, J. S. Jurvelin, and R. Lappalainen. Electrical and dielectric properties of bovine trabecular bone - relationship with mechanical properties and mineral density. Phys. Med. Biol. 48:775-786, 2003.
20. Williams, P. A., and S. Saha. The electrical and dielectric properties of human bone tissue and their relationship with density and bone mineral content. Annals. Biomed. Eng. 24:222-233, 1996.
21. Zlochiver, S., M. M. Radai, M. Rosenfeld, and S. Abboud. Induced current impedance technique for monitoring brain cryosurgery in a two-dimensional model of the head. Annals. Biomed. Eng. 30:1172-1180, 2002.
22. Zlochiver, S., M. Rosenfeld, and S. Abboud. Induced current impedance tomography: A 2-D theoretical simulation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22(12), 2003.
23. Zlochiver, S., M. M. Radai, S. Abboud, M. Rosenfeld, X. Z. Dong, R. G. Liu, F. S. You, H. Y. Xiang, and X. T. Shi. Induced current electrical impedance tomography system: experimental results and numerical simulations. Physiol. Meas. 25:239-255, 2004.
24. Zlochiver, S., M. Rosenfeld, and S. Abboud. Contactless bioimpedance monitoring technique for brain cryosurgery in a 3D head model. Annals. Biomed. Eng. 33:615-625, 2005.