Experimental evaluation of two iterative reconstruction methods for induced current electrical impedance tomography

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 180-187

  Ruan, Wenxin ^a   Guardo, Robert ^a   Adler, Andy ^a  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMODULATORS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; ELECTRODES; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; ITERATIVE METHODS; NETWORKS (CIRCUITS); PATIENT MONITORING; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE;

HATCHELS AUGMENTED MATRIX METHOD; INDUCED CURRENT ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; LAVENBERG MARQUARDT METHOD; NEWTON RAPHSON; NOISE IMMUNITY; SHEFFIELD PROTOCOL;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 0030129691     PISSN: 02780062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/42.491419     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. B. H. Brown, D. C. Barber, and A. D. Seagar, ''Applied potcnUal tomography: Possible clinical applications, Clin. Physiul. Meus., vol. 6, pp. 109-121, 1985
2. J. C. Newell, D. Isaacson, D. Saulnier, M. Cheney, and D. G. Gisser, Acute pulmonary edema assessed by electrical impedance tomography, in Proc. 15th EE/EMBS Conf.. 1993, pp. 92-93.
3. R. Avili, Y. T. Mangnall, N. C. Bird, B. H. Brown, D. C. Barber. A. D. Seagar, A. G. Johnson, and N. W. Read, Applied potential tomography-A new noninvasive technique for measuring gastric emptying, GastoenteroL, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 1019-1026, 1987.
4. W. R Purvis, R. C. Tozer, D. K. Anderson, and I. L Freeston, Induced current impedance imaging, in 1EE Proc., pi. A. 1993, vol. 140, pp. 135-141.
5. R. S. C Cobbold. Transducers for Biomedical Measurements: Principle and Applications. New York: Wiley, 1974, ch. 10, pp. 412-475.
6. B. H. Brown and A. D. Seagar, The Sheffield data collection system, Clin. Phys. and Physiol. Meas., vol. 8, pp. 91-97, 1987.
7. M. Heimbach, Measures of performance, in Electrical Impedance Tomography, J. G. Webster, Ed. New York: Adam Hilgcr, 1990, ch. 12, pp. 158-174
8. N. G. Gener, M. Kuzuoglu, and Y. Z. Ider, Electrical impedance tomography using induced currents, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 338-350, 1994
9. [91 D. K. Anderson, R. C. Tozer, and I. L. Freeston, Backprojection in an induced current impedance imaging system, in Proc. IS/h IEEE/EMUS Conf., 1993, pp. 80-81
10. D. C. Barber and B. H. Brown, Recent developments in applied potential tomography, Information Processing in Medical Imaging S. L. Bacharach, Ed. Dordrecht, Germany: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986, pp. 446-462
11. K. R. Davey, C. H. Cheng, and C. M. Epstein, Prediction of magnetically induced electric fields in biological tissue, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 418-422, 1991
12. W. R. Smythe, Static and Dynamic Electricity. New York: McGrawHill, 1965, pp. 290-291
13. K. H. Huebner and E. A. Thornton, The Finite Element Method for Engineers. New York: Wiley, 1975
14. P. Hua and E. J. Woo, Reconstruction algorithms in Electrical Impedance Tomography, J. G. Webster, Ed. New York: Adam Hilger, 1990
15. T. J. Yorkey, J. G. Webster, and W. J. Tompkins, Comparing reconstruction algorithms for electrical impedance tomography, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. BME-34, no. 11, pp. 843-852, 1987
16. E. J. Woo, P. Hua, J. G. Webster, and W. J. Tompkins, A robust image reconstruction algorithm and its parallel implementation in electrical impedance tomography, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 137-146, 1993
17. C. Boulay, R. Guardo, B. Venne, and M. Bertrand, Bussed signal conditioning modules for BIT, in Proc. 13th 1EEE/EMBS Conf., 1991, pp. 12-13
18. R. Guardo, C. Boulay, B. Murray, and M. Bertrand, An experimental study in electrical impedance tomography using backprojection reconstruction, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 617-627, 1991
19. G. H. Golub and M. Heath, Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter, Technometrics, vol. 21. no. 2, pp. 215-223, 1979.