Comparison of ultraviolet absorbance, chemiluminescence, and DOAS instruments for ambient ozone monitoring

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 18, 2006, Pages 5755-5762

  Williams, E J ^a,b   Fehsenfeld, F C ^a,b   Jobson, B T ^a,b,e   Kuster, W C ^a   Goldan, P D ^a,b   Stutz, J ^c   McClenny, W A ^d  

^a EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^e WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL OPTICAL ABSORPTION SPECTROMETER (DOAS); OZONE MONITORING; VOLATILE ORGANIC CARBON (VOC);

AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY; CHEMILUMINESCENCE; LIGHT ABSORPTION; OZONE; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

POLLUTION DETECTION;

NITRIC OXIDE; ORGANIC CARBON; OZONE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY; CHEMILUMINESCENCE; LIGHT ABSORPTION; OZONE; POLLUTION DETECTION; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

AIR QUALITY; OZONE; STANDARD (REGULATION); ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; URBAN AREA; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ACCURACY; AIR QUALITY STANDARD; ARTICLE; CHEMOLUMINESCENCE; DIFFERENTIAL OPTICAL ABSORPTION SPECTROMETER; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EVALUATION; INDUSTRIAL AREA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIGHT ABSORPTION; MONITOR; SPECTROMETER; SPECTROMETRY; SUMMER; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; UNITED STATES; URBAN AREA;

CHEMILUMINESCENT MEASUREMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MAINE; OZONE; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ULTRAVIOLET; TENNESSEE; TEXAS;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; GULF OF MAINE; HOUSTON; NASHVILLE; NORTH AMERICA; TENNESSEE; TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33748784650     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es0523542     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Leston, A. R.; Ollison, W. M.; Spicer, C. W.; J. Satola, J. Potential interference bias in ozone Standard compliance monitoring J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 2005, 55, 1464-1472.
2. Kleindienst, T. E.; Hudgens, E. E.; Smith, D. F.; McElroy, F. F.; Bufalini, J. J. Comparison of chemiluminescence and ultraviolet ozone monitor responses in the presence of humidity and photochemical pollutants J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., 1993, 43, 213-222.
3. Kleindienst, T. E.; McIver, C. D.; Ollison, W. M. A study of interferences in ambient ozone monitors. In Proceedings of a Specialty Conference: Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants, VIP-74; Air and Waste Management Association: Pittsburgh, PA, 1997; pp 215-225.
4. Arshinov, M. Yu.; Belan, B. D.; Krasnov, O. A.; Kovalevskii, V. K.; Pirogov, V. A.; Plotnikov, A. P.; Tolmachev, G. N.; Fofonov, A. V. Comparison of ultraviolet and chemiluminescent ozonometers Atmos. Oceanic Opt. 2002, 15, 656-658.
5. Leston, A. R.; Ollison, W. M. The impact of ambient aerosols on ozone as measured by ultraviolet photometry. In Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants, VIP-100/CD, September 12-14, RTP, NC; Air and Waste Management Association: Pittsburgh, PA, 2000.
6. Kauper, E. K., Ozone measurements over snow Atmos. Environ. 1978, 12, 1287-1288.
7. 2 in urban plumes, J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108 (D16), 4496, doi: 10.1029/ 2003JD003559.
8. x in the nocturnal boundary layer: 1. Observations during the Texas Air Quality study 2000 J. Geophys. Res., 2004, 109, D12306, doi: 10.1029/ 2003JD004209.
9. Meyer, C. P.; Ellsworth, C. M.; Galbally, I. E. Water vapor interference in the measurement of ozone in ambient air by ultraviolet absorption Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1991, 62, 223.
10. Maddy, J. A. A test that identifies ozone monitors prone to anomalous behavior while sampling hot and humid air, paper 98-MBP.02P. In Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association, 91st Annual Meeting, June 14-18, 1998, San Diego, CA; Air and Waste Management Association: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
11. Ridley, B. A.; Grahek, F. E.; Walega, J. G. A small, high-sensitivity, medium- response ozone detector suitable for measurements from light aircraft J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 1992, 9, 142-148.
12. Alicke, B.; Platt, U.; Stutz, J. Impact of nitrous acid photolysis on the total hydroxyl radical budget during the Limitation of Oxidant Production/Pianura Padana Produzione di Ozono study in Milan J. Geophys. Res., 2002, 107 (D22), 8196, doi: 10.1029/ 2000JD000075.
13. Orphal, J. A Critical Review of the Absorption Cross Sections of O3 and NO2 in the 240-790 nm Region, Part I: Ozone. In ESA Technical Note MO-TN-ESA-GO-0302; European Space Agency: Noordwijk, 2002; pp 126.
14. Stutz, J.; Platt, U. Numerical analysis and estimation of the statistical error of differential optical absorption spectroscopy measurements with least-squares methods Appl. Opt., 1996, 35, 6041-6053.
15. Jobson, B. T.; Berkowitz, C. M.; Kuster, W. C.; Goldan, P. D.; Williams, E. J.; Fehsenfeld, F. C.; Apel, E. C.; Karl, T.; Lonneman, W. A.; Riemer, D. Hydrocarbon source signatures in Houston, Texas: Influence of the petrochemical industry J. Geophys. Res., 2004, 109, D24305, doi: 10.1029/2004JD004887.
16. Harrison, M. A.; Barra, J. S.; Borghesi, D.; Vione, D.; Arsene, C.; Olariu, R. I. Nitrated phenols in the atmosphere: a review Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 231-248.