The effect of a summarization-based cumulative retelling strategy on listening comprehension of college students with visual impairments

Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness

Volumn 100, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 353-365

  Tuncer, A Tuba ^a   Altunay, Banu ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COLLEGE STUDENT; COMPREHENSION; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; READING; SPECIAL EDUCATION; TEACHING; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

EID: 33748778769     PISSN: 0145482X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0145482x0610000606     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
2. Brown, S. A., Dune, J. D., & Cooper, J. O. (1996). Immediate retelling's effect on student retention. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 387-407.
3. Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kameenui, E. J., & Tarver, S. G. (2004). Direct instruction in reading. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
4. Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264.
5. Erin, J. N., & Corn, A. L. (1993). Learning and study strategies of secondary school students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 87, 263-272.
6. Gajria, M., & Salvia, J. (1992). The effects of summarization instruction on text comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 508-516.
7. Gambrell, L. B., Pfeiffer, W. R., & Wilson, R. M. (1985). The effects of retelling upon reading comprehension and recall of text information. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 216-220.
8. Gambrell, L. B., Koskinen, P. S., & Kapinus, B. A. (1991). Retelling and the reading comprehension of proficient and less-proficient readers. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 356-362.
9. Ghesquiere, P., & Laurijssen, J. (1999). The significance of auditory study to university students who are blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 93, 40-44.
10. Hare, V. C., & Borchardt, K. M. (1984). Direct instruction of summarization skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 62-78.
11. Hatlen, P. (1996). The core curriculum for blind and visually impaired students, including those with additional disabilities. RE:view, 28, 25-32.
12. Kameenui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (1990). Designing instructional strategies. Columbus, OH: Merill.
13. Malone, L. D., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 270-279.
14. Nelson, J. R., & Smith, D. J. (1992). The effects of teaching a summary skills strategy to students identified as learning disabled on their comprehension of science text. Education & Treatment of Children, 15, 228-238.
15. Rosenshine, B. V. (1978). Academic engaged time, content covered, and direct instruction. Journal of Education, 160, 38-66.
16. Senge, J. C., & Dote-Kwan, J. (1995). Information accessibility in alternative formats in postsecondary education. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 89, 120-127.