Instructional control: Developing a relational frame analysis;Control instruccional: Desarrollando un análisis basado en la relational frame theory

International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 263-284

  O'llora, Denis ^a   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Contingency specifying stimuli; Derived stimulus relations; Instruction; Relational evaluation procedure; Relational frame theory; Relational network; Rule governed behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748768468     PISSN: 15777057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ayllon, T. & Azrin, N. H. (1964). Reinforcement and instructions with mental patients. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 327-331.
2. Barnes, D. & Holmes. Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism. stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19-31.
3. Barnes, D. & Keenan. M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior 59, 61-81.
4. Barnes, D. & Roche, B. (1997). A behaviour analytic approach to behavioral reflexivity. The Psychological Record, 47, 543-572.
5. Barnes-Holmes, D. & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2000). Explaining complex human behavior: Two approaches to the concept of generalized operant classes? The Psychological Record, 50, 251-265.
6. Barnes-Holmes, D. & Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Cullinan. V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner's Verbal Behavior: A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 69-84.
7. Barnes-Holmes, D.,O'Hora, D., Roche, B., Hayes. S.C., Bisset. R.T., & Lyddy. F (2001). Understanding and Verbal Regulation. In S.C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes. & B.T. Roche (Eds.) Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. New York: Plenum.
8. Baron, A., Kaufman, A., & Stauber, K. A. (1969). Effects of instructions and reinforcement-feedback on human operant behavior maintained by fixed-interval reinforcement. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior: 12, 701-712.
9. Barrett, D.M., Deitz. S.M., Gaydos, G.R., & Quinn, P.C. (1987). The effects of programmed contingencies and social conditions on response stereotypy with human subjects. Psychological Record, 37,489-505.
10. Catania, A.C. (1984). Learning. Second edition. NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Catania, A.C. (1989). Rules as classes of verbal behavior: .A reply to Glenn. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior 7, 49-50.
12. Catania. A.C., Matthews, B.A., & Shimoff, E. (1982). Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior: 38,233-218.
13. Cerutti. D.T. (1989). Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior: 51. 259-276.
14. Chase, P.N. & Danforth, J.S. (1991). The role of rules in concept learning. In L. J. Hayes and P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 205-222). Reno NV Context Press.
15. Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26-58.
16. Danforth, J.S., Chase. P.N., Dolan, M., & Joyce, J. (1990). The establishment of stimulus control by instructions and by differential reinforcement. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54. 97-112.
17. DeGrandpre, R.J. & Buskist, W.E (1991). Effects of accuracy of instructions on human behavior: Correspondence with with reinforcement contingencies matters. The Psychological Record, 41,371-384.
18. Dymond, S. & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination functions in accordance with the derived stimulus relations of Sameness. More than, and Less than. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior: 64. 163-184.
19. Galizio. M. (1979). Contingency shaped and rule governed behavior: Instructional control of human loss avoidance. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 53-70.
20. Harzem, P., Lowe, C.F., & Bagshaw, M. (1978). Verbal control in human operant behavior. The Psychological Record, 28. 405-423.
21. Hayes. S.C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.). Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19-40) Reno, NV: Context Press.
22. Hayes. S.C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S.C. Hayes. L.S. Hayes, M. Sato. & K. Olio (Eds.), Behavior, analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9-30). Reno NV: Context Press.
23. Hayes. S.C. & Barnes, D. (1997). Analysing derived stimulus relations takes more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior.
24. Hayes. S.C., Barnes-Holmes, D.,& Roche, B.T. (2001). Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. New York: Plenum.
25. Hayes. S.C, Brownstein, A. J., Haas, J.R.,& Greenway, D.E. (1986). Instructions. multiple schedules, and extinction: Distinguishing rule governed from schedule controlled behavior. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 137-147.
26. Hayes, S.C., Brownstein, A.J., Zettle. R.D., Rosenfarb. I., & Korn, Z. (1986). Rule governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior; 45, 237-256.
27. Hayes S.C., Gifford, E.C., & Hayes, G.J. (1998). Moral behavior and the development of verbal regulation. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior: 21. 253-279.
28. Hayes, S.C. & Hayes, L.J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule governance. In S.C. Hayes (Ed.). Rule governed behavior: Cognition. contingencies. and instructional contro1 (pp. 153-190). New York: Plenum Press.
29. Hayes, S.C. & Hayes. L.J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383-1395.
30. Hayes, S.C., Kohlenberg, B.K., & Hayes, L.J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence classes. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 119-137.
31. Hayes, S.C.. & Wilson. K.G. (1993). Some applied implications of a contemporary behavior-analytic account of verbal events. The Behavior Analyst, 16. 283-301, 68, 235-270.
32. Kaufman: A., Baron. A.,& Kopp. R.E. (1966). Some effects of instructions on human operant behavior. Psychomonic Monograph Supplements, 1, 243-250.
33. Leander. J.D., Lippman, L.G., & Meyer. M.M. (1968). Fixed interval performance as related to instructions and subjects verbalizations of the reinforcement contingency. The Psychological Record, 18, 469-474.
34. LeFrancois, J.R., Chase. P.N., & Joyce. J.H. (1988). The effects of instructions on human operant behavior. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 49, 383-393.
35. Lowe, C.F, Harzem. P., & Bagshaw. M. (1978). Species differences in temporal control behavior. II: Human performance. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 29, 351-361.
36. Lowe, C.F, Harzem, P., & Hughes. S. (1978). Determinants of operant behavior in humans: Some differences from annuals.
37. Martinez-Sanchez. H. & Ribes-Inesta, F. (1996). Interactions of contingencies and instructional history on conditional discrimination. The Psychological Record. 46, 301-318.
38. Matthews, B. A., Shimoff, E., Catania, A.C.,& Sagvolden, F. (1977). Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity to Ratio and Interval Contingencies. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior: 27. 453-467.
39. Michael, J. (1980). The discriminative stimulus or Sd. The Behavior Analyst. 3, 47-49.
40. Newman. B., Hemmes. N.S., Buffington. D.M., & Andrepoulos, S. (1994). The effects of schedules of reinforcement on instruction-following in human subjects with verbal and nonverbal stimuli. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior. 12, 31-41.
41. Okouchi, H. (1999). Instructions as discriminative stimuli. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior: 72, 205-214.
42. O'Hora. D. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). The referential nature of rules and instructions: A response to instructions, rules, and abstraction: A misconstrued relation by Emilio Ribes-Inesta. Behavoir and Philosophy, 29, 21-25.
43. Parrot. L.J. (1987). Rule-governed behavior: An implicit analysis of references. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), B. F Skinner: Consensus and controversy (pp. 265-282). New York: Falmer Press.
44. Reese, H.W. (1968). The perception of stimulus relations: Discrimination learning and transposition. New York: Academic Press.
45. Reese, H.W. (1989). Rules and rule governance: Cognitive and behavioral views. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.). Rule governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies; and instructional control (pp. 153-190) New York: Plenum Press.
46. Ribes-Inesta, E. (2000). Instructions, rules and abstraction: A misconstrued relation. Behavior and Philosophy, 28. 41-55.
47. Roche. B.,& Barnes. D. (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test of the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 489-507.
48. Schlilnger. H.D. (1993). Separating discriminative and function-altering effects of verbal stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 16. 9-23.
49. Schmitt, D.R. (1990). Effects of consequences of advice on patterns of rule control and rule choice. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70. 1-21.
50. Schoenfeld. W.N. & Cumming. W.W. (1963). Behavior and perception. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (pp. 213-252). New York: Plenum.
51. Shimoff, E., Catania, A.C., & Matthews. B.A. (1981). Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity of low rate performances to schedule contingencies. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 207-220.
52. Sidman. M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.
53. Sidman. M. (1994). Equivalences relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Author's Cooperative.
54. Sidman, M. & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination versus matching to sample: An extension of the testing paradigin. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
55. Skinner, B.F. (1957) Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
56. Skinner, B.F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
57. Skinner, B.F. (1986). The evolution of verbal behavior. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 115-122.
58. Skinner, B.F. (1989). The behavior of the listener. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and inistructional control (pp. 85-96), New York: Plenum.
59. Steele. D. & Hayes, S.C. (1991). Stimulus equivalance and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.
60. Vargas, E. (1988). Verbally governed and event governed behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior: 6. 11-22.
61. Welner, H. (1970). Instructional control of human operant responding during extinction following fixed-ratio conditioning. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior; 13, 391-394.
62. Zettle. R.D. & Hayes, S.C. (1982). Rule governed behavior: A potential theoretical framework for coginitive-behavior therapy. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.). Advances in Cognitive-Behavioral Research and Therapy, (Vol. 1; pp. 73-118). New York: Academic.