Plant-specific dynamic failure assessment using Bayesian theory

Chemical Engineering Science

Volumn 61, Issue 21, 2006, Pages 7036-7056

  Meel, Anjana ^a   Seider, Warren D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accident precursor data; Bayesian modeling; Copula; Dynamic risk assessment; Event tree; Process systems engineering; Safety

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FUZZY SETS; PROCESS CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

ACCIDENT PRECURSOR DATA; BAYESIAN MODELING; COPULA; DYNAMIC RISK ASSESSMENT;

CHEMICAL PLANTS;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; CHEMICAL PLANTS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FUZZY SETS; PROCESS CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

EID: 33748761173     PISSN: 00092509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2006.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anand, S., Keren, N., Tretter, M.J., Wang, Y., O'Connor, T.M., Mannan, M.S., 2004. Harnessing data mining to explore incident databases. 7th Annual Symposium, Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center. College Station, TX.
2. Bayes T. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 53 (1763) 370-418
3. Bier V.M. Statistical-methods for the use of accident precursor data in estimating the frequency of rare events. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 41 3 (1993) 267-280
4. CCPS, 1997. Process Safety Incident Database (PSID). 〈http://www.aiche.org/CCPS/ActiveProjects/PSID/index.aspx〉.
5. CCPS, 2000. Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, Second ed. A.I.Ch.E. Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York.
6. Chen W.S., Bakshi B.R., Goel P.K., and Ungarala S. Bayesian estimation via sequential Monte Carlo sampling: Unconstrained nonlinear dynamic systems. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 43 14 (2004) 4012-4025
7. Crowl D.A., and Louvar J.F. Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications (1990), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
8. Gentleman, R., Ihaka, R., Bates, D., Chambers, J., Dalgaard, J., Hornik, K., 2005. The R project for Statistical Computing. 〈 http://www.r-project.org/〉.
9. Gustafson, D.E., Kessel, W., 1979. Fuzzy clustering with a fuzzy covariance matrix. Proceedings of IEEE-CDC.
10. Jun C.H., Chang S.Y., Hong Y., and Yang H. A Bayesian approach to prediction of system failure rates by criticalities under event trees. International Journal of Production Economics 60 1 (1999) 623-628
11. Khan F.I., and Husain T. Risk assessment and safety evaluation using probabilistic fault tree analysis. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 7 7 (2001) 1909-1927
12. Kirchsteiger C. Impact of accident precursors on risk estimates from accident databases. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 10 3 (1997) 159-167
13. Kleindorfer P.R., Belke J.C., Elliott M.R., Lee K., Lowe R.A., and Feldman H.I. Accident epidemiology and the US chemical industry: Accident history and worst-case data from RMP*Info. Risk Analysis 23 5 (2003) 865-881
14. Mannan M.S., O'Connor T.M., and West H.H. Accident history database: An opportunity. Environmental Progress 18 1 (1999) 1-6
15. Meel A., Venkat A.N., and Gudi R.D. Disturbance classification and rejection using pattern recognition methods. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 42 14 (2003) 3321-3333
16. Mehranbod N., Soroush M., and Panjapornpon C. A method of sensor fault detection and identification. Journal of Process Control 15 3 (2005) 321-339
17. Nelsen R.B. An Introduction to Copulas. Lecture Notes in Statistics (1999), Springer, New York
18. NRC, 1991. National Response Center 〈http://www.nrc.uscg.mil/nrchp.html.〉
19. Phimister J.R., Oktem U., Kleindorfer P.R., and Kunreuther H. Near-miss incident management in the chemical process industry. Risk Analysis 23 3 (2003) 445-459
20. Powers G.J., and Tompkins F.C. Fault tree synthesis for chemical processes. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 20 2 (1974) 376-386
21. Rasmussen, K., 1996. The experience with Major Accident Reporting System from 1984 to 1993. European Commission, Joint Research Center, EUR 16341 EN.
22. RMP, 2000. 40 CFR Chapter IV, Accidental Release Prevention Requirements; Risk Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act Section 112(r)(7); Distribution of Off-Site Consequence Analysis Information. Final Rule, 65 FR 48108.
23. Robert C.P. The Bayesian Choice (2001), Springer, New York
24. Santamará Ramiro J.M., and Braña Aísa P.A. Risk Analysis and Reduction in the Chemical Process Industry (1998), Blackie Academic and Professional, New York
25. Sklar A. Random variables, joint distribution, and copulas. Kybernetica 9 (1973) 449-460
26. Steinbach J. Safety Assessment for Chemical Processes (1999), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
27. Taylor J.R. Risk Analysis for Process Plants, Pipelines and Transport (1994), E&FN Spon, New York
28. Venkatasubramanian V., Rengaswamy R., and Kavuri S.N. A review of process fault detection and diagnosis, Part II: Quantitative model and search strategies. Computers and Chemical Engineering 27 3 (2003) 313-326
29. Venkatasubramanian V., Rengaswamy R., Kavuri S.N., and Yin K. A review of process fault detection and diagnosis, Part III: Process history based methods. Computers and Chemical Engineering 27 3 (2003) 327-346
30. Won J.K., and Modarres M. Improved Bayesian method for diagnosing equipment partial failures in process plants. Computers and Chemical Engineering 22 10 (1998) 1483-1502
31. Wu H.C. Fuzzy reliability estimation using Bayesian approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering 46 3 (2004) 467-493
32. Yi W., and Bier V.M. An application of copulas to accident precursor analysis. Management Science 44 12 (1998) S257-S270