Framing the field of homeland security: The case of Norway

Journal of Management Studies

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1395-1413

  Lægreid, Per ^a   Serigstad, Synnøve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748758701     PISSN: 00222380     EISSN: 14676486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00650.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Baldwin, R. and Cave, M. (1999). Understanding Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bardach, E. (1998). Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Art and Practice of Managerial Craftsmanship. Washington, DC: The Brooking? Institution.
3. Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
4. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
5. Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A. (2000). 'Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment'. Annual Reuiew of Sociology, 26, 611-39.
6. Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2002). Reformer og lederskap. Omstilling i den utøvende makt. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
7. Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2005). 'Agencification and Regulatory Reforms'. Paper presented at the Scancor/SOG workshop on 'Autonomization of the State: From Integrated Administrative Models to Single-Purpose Organizations'. Stanford University, 1-2 April.
8. Cohen, M., March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1972). 'A garbage can model of organizational choice'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.
9. DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. W. (1983). 'Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields'. American Sociological Review, 48, 4, 147-60.
10. Eden, L. (2004). Whole World on Fire. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11. Fligstein, N. (1991). 'The structural transformation of American industry: an institutional account of the causes of diversification in the largest firms'. In Powell, W. and DiMaggio, P. (Eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. Frederickson, H. G. and LaPorte, T. R. (2002). 'Airport security, high reliability, and the problem of rationality'. Public Administration Review, 62, 33-43.
13. Hammond, T. (2004). 'Why is the Intelligence Community so Different (Difficult?) to Redesign?'. Paper presented at the SOG-conference, University of British Colombia, Vancouver, 15-17 June.
14. Hammond, T., Jen, K. I. and Maeda, K. (2003). 'Intelligence Organizations and the Organization of Intelligence: What Library Catalogues Can Tell Us About 9/11'. Paper presented at the SOG-conference, George Washington University, Washington DC, 22-24 May.
15. Harmon, M. M. and Mayer, R. T. (1986). Organization Theory of Public Administration. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co.
16. Hoffman, A. J. (1999). 'Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the US chemical industry'. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 4, 351-71.
17. Hood, C., Rothstein, H. and Baldwin, R. (2001). The Government of Risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Hutter, B. and Power, M. (Eds) (2005). Organizational Encounters with Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Kettl, D. F. (1993). 'Learning Organizations and Managing the Unknown'. Paper presented at the Conference on Rethinking Public Personnel Systems, 16-17 April, Washington DC.
20. Kettl, D. F. (2003). 'Contingent coordination: practical and theoretical puzzles for homeland security'. American Review for Public Administration 33, September, 253-77.
21. Kettl, D. F. (2004a). 'The States and Homeland Security. Building the Missing Link'. A Century Foundation Report. New York: The Century Foundation.
22. Kettl, D. F. (2004b). System Under Stress. Homeland Security and American Polities. Washington, DC: CQ. Press.
23. Kettl, D. F. et al. (2004). The Department of Homeland Security's First Year. A Report Card. Washington, DC: The Century Foundation Press.
24. Kingdon, J. F. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd edition. New York: Longman.
25. LaPorte, T. R. (1996). 'High reliability organizations: unlikely, demanding and at risk'. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4, 255-9.
26. Lawrence, P. and Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M. and Hirsch, P. M. (2003). 'Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: a cultural-political perspective on US recycling". Socio-Economic Review, 1, 71-104.
28. March, J. G. and Olsen,J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.
29. March, J. G. and Shapira, Z. (1987). 'Managerial perspectives on risk and risk-taking". Management Science, 33, 1404-18.
30. Mayntz, R. and Sharpf, F. (1975). Policymaking in the German Federal Bureaucracy. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
31. Morgan, G. and Engwall, L. (Eds) (1999). Regulation and Organizations. International Perspectives. London: Routledge.
32. Morill, C. (2006). 'Institutional change through interstitial emergence: the growth of alternative dispute resolution in American law, 1965-1995'. In Powell, W. W. and Jones, D. L. (Eds), How Institutions Change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (forthcoming).
33. National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States (2004). The 9/11 Commission Report. New York: W. Norton & Company.
34. NOU (2000). Et sårbart samfunn. Utfordringer for sikkerhets- og beredskapsarbeidet i samfunnet. Report 24. Oslo: Ministry of Justice.
35. Olsen, J. P. (1996). 'Norway: slow learner or another triumph of the tortoise?'. In Olsen, J. P. and Peters, B. J. (Eds), Lessons form Experience. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
36. Olsen, J. P. (1997). 'Civil service in transition - dilemmas and lesson learned'. In Hesse, J. J. and Toonen, T. A. J. (Eds), The European 'Yearbook of Comparative Government and Public Administration, Vol. III. BadenBaden: Nomos.
37. Peters, B. G. (2004). 'Are We Safer Today? Organizational Responses to Terrorism'. Unpublished paper. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
38. Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B. and Hardy, C. (2000). 'Inter-organizational collaborations and the dynamics of institutional fields'. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 1, 23-43.
39. Pollitt, C. (2005). 'Ministries and agencies: steering, meddling, neglecting and dependency'. In Painter, M. and Pierre, J. (Eds), Challenges to State Policy Capacity. London: Palgrave.
40. Pollitt, C. and Talbot, C. (Eds) (2004). Unbundled Government. London: Routledge.
41. Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J. and Smullen, A. (2004). Agencies: How Governments Do Things Through Semi-Autonomous Organizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
42. Power, M. (2004). The Risk Management of Everything. London: Demos.
43. Rochefort, D. A. and Cobb, R. W. (Eds) (1994). The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. Lawrence, KA: University of Kansas Press.
44. Scheytt, T., Soin, K., Sahlin-Andersson, K. and Power, M. (2006). 'Organizations, Risk and Regulation'. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 6, 1331-7.
45. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Scott, W. R. et al. (2000). Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration. New York: Harper and Row.
48. Serigstad, S. (2003). 'Eit sårbart samfunn. Ein Studie av omorganiseringa av den sentrale tryggleiks- og beredskapsforvaltninga i Noreg i perioden 1999-2002'. Report 16. Bergen: Rokkan Centre, 2003.
49. Short, J. F. and Clarke, L. (Eds) (1992). Organizations: Uncertainties, and Risk. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
50. St.meld. no. 17 (White Paper) (2001-02). Samfunnssikkerhet. Veien til et mindre sårbart samfunn. Oslo: Ministry of Justice.
51. Turner, B. A. and Pidgeon, N. F. (1997). Man-Made Disasters, 2nd edition. Oxford: Butterwoith-Heinemann.
52. Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger Launch Decision. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
53. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It? New York: Basic Books.
54. Wise, C. R. (2002a). 'Reorganizing the federal government for homeland security: congress attempts to create a new department'. Extensions, Fall, 14-19.
55. Wise, C. R. (2002b). 'Organizing for homeland security'. Public Administration Review, 62, 2, 131-44.
56. Wise, C. R. and Nader, R. (2002). 'Organizing the federal system for homeland security: problems, issues, and dilemmas'. Public Administration Review, 62, 44-57.