Evaluation of pulmonary function using breathing chest radiography with a dynamic flat panel detector: Primary results in pulmonary diseases

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 41, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 735-745

  Tanaka, Rie ^a   Sanada, Shigeru ^a   Okazaki, Nobuo ^b   Kobayashi, Takeshi ^c   Fujimura, Masaki ^a   Yasui, Masahide ^a   Matsui, Takeshi ^c   Nakayama, Kazuya ^a   Nanbu, Yuko ^c   Matsui, Osamu ^c  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

^b Ohtsuka Ryougoku Clinic   (Japan)

^c KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Air trapping; Airflow; Asthma; Chest radiography; Computer analysis; Diaphragm; Emphysema; Flat panel detector; FPD; Functional imaging; Pulmonary function; Ventilation; Visualization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; BREATHING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIAPHRAGM; DIAPHRAGM MOVEMENT; EMPHYSEMA; FEMALE; FLAT PANEL DETECTOR; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERSTITIAL PNEUMONIA; LUNG DISEASE; LUNG FUNCTION; LUNG FUNCTION TEST; LUNG LOBE; LUNG NODULE; LUNG VENTILATION; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESPIRATORY AIRFLOW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; VITAL CAPACITY;

EID: 33748750150     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000236904.79265.68     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Vano E, Geiger B, Schreiner A, et al. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50:5731-5742.
2. Toffolo RR, Beerel FR. The autofluoroscope and 133-Xe in dynamic studies of pulmonary perfusion and ventilation. Radiology. 1970;94:692-696.
3. George RB, Weill H, Tahir AH. Fluorodensimetric evaluation of regional ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. South Med J. 1971;64:1161-1165.
4. George RB, Weill H. Fluorodensimetry. A method for analyzing regional ventilation and diaphragm function. JAMA. 1971;217:171-176.
5. Silverman NR. Clinical video-densitometry. Pulmonary ventilation analysis. Radiology. 1972;103:263-265.
6. Desprechins B, Luypaert R, Delree M, et al. Evaluation of time interval difference digital subtraction fluoroscopy patients with cystic fibrosis. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1988;143:86-92.
7. Lam KL, Chan HP, MacMahon H, et al. Dynamic digital subtraction evaluation of regional pulmonary ventilation with nonradioactive xenon. Invest Radiol. 1990;25:728-735.
8. Kiura A, Svedstrom E, Kuuluvainen I. Dynamic imaging of pulmonary ventilation. Description of a novel digital fluoroscopic system. Acta Radiol. 1991;32:114-119.
9. Baily NA. Video techniques for x-ray imaging and data extraction from roentgenographic and fluoroscopic presentations. Med Phys. 1980;7:472-491.
10. Fujita H, Doi K, MacMahon H, et al. Basic imaging properties of a large image intensifier-TV digital chest radiographic system. Invest Radiol. 1987;22:328-335.
11. Suga S, Tsukuda T, Awaya H, et al. Impaired respiratory mechanics in pulmonary emphysema. Evaluation with dynamic breathing MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:510-520.
12. Berthezene Y, Croisille P, Wiart M, et al. Prospective comparison of MR lung perfusion and lung scintigraphy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;9:61-68.
13. Maki DD, Gefter WB, Alavi A. Recent advances in pulmonary imaging. Chest. 1999;116:1388-1402.
14. Hatabu H, Chen Q, Stock KW, et al. Fast magnetic resonance imaging of the lung. Eur J Radiol. 1999;29:114-132.
15. Unal O, Arslan H, Uzun K, et al. Evaluation of diaphragmatic movement with MR fluoroscopy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Imaging. 2000;24:347-350.
16. Suga K, Tsukuda T, Awaya H, et al. Interactions of regional respiratory mechanics and pulmonary ventilatory impairment in pulmonary emphysema: assessment with dynamic MRI and xenon-133 single-photon emission CT. Chest. 2000;117:1646-1655.
17. Amundsen T, Torheim G, Waage A, et al. Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging of the lung: characterization of pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:224-231.
18. Kauczor HU, Kreitner KF. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the lung. Eur J Radiol. 2000;34:196-207.
19. Cluzel P, Similowski T, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, et al. Diaphragm and chest wall: assessment of the inspiratory pump with MR imaging - preliminary observations. Radiology. 2000;215:574-583.
20. Salerno M, Altes TA, Mugler JP 3rd, et al. Hyperpolarized noble gas MR imaging of the lung: potential clinical applications. Eur J Radiol. 2001;40:33-44.
21. Kauczor HU, Chen XJ, van Beek EJ, et al. Pulmonary ventilation imaged by magnetic resonance: at the doorstep of clinical application. Eur Respir J. 2001;17:1008-1023.
22. Ohno Y, Hatabu H, Takenaka D, et al. Dynamic oxygen-enhanced MRI reflects diffusing capacity of the lung. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:1139-1144.
23. Kauczor HU, Hanke A, Van Beek EJ. Assessment of lung ventilation by MR imaging: current status and future perspectives. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1962-1970.
24. Kotani T, Minami S, Takahashi K, et al. An analysis of chest wall and diaphragm motions in patients with idiopathic scoliosis using dynamic breathing MRI. Spine. 2004;29:298-302.
25. Van Beek EJ, Wild JM, Kauczor HU, et al. Functional MRI of the lung using hyperpolarized 3-helium gas. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20:540-554.
26. Haage P, Karaagac S, Spuntrup E, et al. Feasibility of pulmonary ventilation visualization with aerosolized magnetic resonance contrast media. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:85-88.
27. Webb WR, Stern JE, Kanth N, et al. Dynamic pulmonary CT: findings in healthy adult men. Radiology. 1993;186:117-124.
28. David M, Athol U, Michael B, et al. Bronchiectasis: functional significance of areas of decreased attenuation at expiratory CT. Radiology. 1994;193:369-374.
29. Johnson JL, Kramer SS, Mahboubi S. Air trapping in children: evaluation with dynamic lung densitometry with spiral CT. Radiology. 1998;206:95-101.
30. Bakker ME, Stolk J, Putter H, et al. Variability in densitometric assessment of pulmonary emphysema with computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:777-783.
31. Tanaka R, Sanada S, Suzuki M, et al. Breathing chest radiography using a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD) combined with computer analysis. Med Phys. 2004;31:2254-2262.
32. Tanaka R, Sanada S, Kobayashi T, et al. Computerized methods for determining respiratory phase on dynamic chest radiographs obtained by a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD) system. J Digital Imag. 2006;19:41-51.
33. Xu XW, Doi K. Image feature analysis for computer-aided diagnosis: accurate determination of ribcage boundary in chest radiographs. Med Phys. 1995;22:617-626.
34. Li L, Zheng Y, Kallergi M, et al. Improved method for automatic identification of lung regions on chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 2001;8:629-638.
35. Gonzalez RC, Wintz P. Digital Image Processing. Boston: Addison-Wesley; 1987.
36. Squire LF, Novelline RA. Overexpansion and collapse of the lung. In: Fundamentals of Radiology, 4th ed. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press; 1988:88-89.
37. West JB. Ventilation - how gas gets to the alveoli. In: Respiratory Physiology - The Essentials, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000:11-19.