Development of standard tests to examine viscoelastic properties of blood of experimental animals for pediatric mechanical support device evaluation

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 567-574

  Marascalco, Philip J ^a,b   Ritchie, Sean P ^b   Snyder, Trevor A ^a,b   Kameneva, Marina V ^a,b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NON NEWTONIAN BEHAVIOR; PLASMA VISCOSITY; PORCINE BLOOD; RED BLOOD CELLS (RBC);

BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT; CELLS; PEDIATRICS; STRESSES; VISCOELASTICITY; VISCOSITY;

BLOOD;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BLOOD RHEOLOGY; BLOOD VISCOSITY; ERYTHROCYTE; HEMATOCRIT; IN VITRO STUDY; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONHUMAN; VISCOELASTICITY;

ANIMALS; ASSISTED CIRCULATION; BLOOD VISCOSITY; CATTLE; CHILD; ELASTICITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEMATOCRIT; HUMANS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SHEEP; SWINE; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 33748688848     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mat.0000242248.66083.48     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Bohler T, Leo A, Stadler A, Linderkamp O: Mechanical fragility of erythrocyte membrane in neonates and adults. Pediatr Res 32: 92-96, 1992.
2. Leverett LB, Hellums JD, Alfrey CP, Lynch EC: Red blood cell damage by shear stress. Biophys J 12: 257-273, 1972.
3. Wendt MO, Pohl M, Lerche D: [Mechanical hemolysis caused by artificial organs-comparison of in vitro hemolysis studies and their application to in vivo conditions]. Biomed Techn 39: 259-263, 1994.
4. Umezu M, Yamada T, Fujimasu H, et al: Effects of surface roughness on mechanical hemolysis. Artif Organs 20: 575-578, 1996.
5. Song X, Throckmorton AL, Wood HG, et al: Computational fluid dynamics prediction of blood damage in a centrifugal pump. Artif Organs 27: 938-941, 2003.
6. Arvand A, Hormes M, Reul H: A validated computational fluid dynamics model to estimate hemolysis in a rotary blood pump. Artif Organs 29: 531-540, 2005.
7. Bluestein D: Research approaches for studying flow-induced thromboembolic complications in blood recirculating devices. Expert Rev Med Devices 1: 65-80, 2004.
8. Thompson LO, Loebe M, Noon GP: What price support? Ventricular assist device induced systemic response. ASAIO J 49: 518-526, 2003.
9. Kammerer T, Fuchs A, Mendonca M, et al: [Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as cardiac assist device in pediatrics]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 38: 514-521, 2003.
10. Brinsfield DE, Hopf MA, Geering RB, Galletti PM: Hematological changes in long-term perfusion. J Appl Physiol 17: 531-534, 1962.
11. Kameneva MV, Antaki JF, Butler KC, et al: A sheep model for the study of hemorheology with assisted circulation: Effect of an axial flow blood pump. ASAIO J 40: 959-963, 1994.
12. Kameneva MV, Marad PF, Brugger JM, et al: In vitro evaluation of hemolysis and sublethal blood trauma in a novel subcutaneous vascular access system for hemodialysis. ASAIO J 48: 34-38, 2002.
13. Wurzinger LJ, Blasberg P, Schmid-Schonbein H: Towards a concept of thrombosis in accelerated flow: Rheology, fluid dynamics, and biochemistry. Biorheology 22: 437-450, 1985.
14. Pierce CN, Larson DF, Arabia FA, Copeland JG: Inflammatory mediated chronic anemia in patients supported with a mechanical circulatory assist device. J Extra Corpor Technol 36: 10-15, 2004.
15. Hung TC, Butter DB, Kormos RL, et al: Characteristics of blood rheology in patients during Novacor left ventricular assist system support. ASAIO Transactions 35: 611-613, 1989.
16. Hung TC, Butter DB, Yie CL, et al: Effects of long-term Novacor artificial heart support on blood rheology. ASAIO Trans 37: M312-313, 1991.
17. Thurston GB: Rheological parameters for the viscosity viscoelasticity and thixotropy of blood. Biorheology 16: 149-162, 1979.
18. Nash GB, Meiselman HJ: Alteration of red cell membrane viscoelasticity by heat treatment: Effect on cell deformability and suspension viscosity. Biorheology 22: 73-84, 1985.
19. Popel AS, Johnson PC, Kameneva MV, Wild MA: Capacity for red blood cell aggregation is higher in athletic mammalian species than in sedentary species. J Appl Physiol 77: 1790-1794, 1994.
20. Begg TB, Hearns JB: Components in blood viscosity: The relative contribution of haematocrit, plasma fibrinogen and other proteins. Clin Sci 31: 87-93, 1966.
21. Chien S, Usami S, Taylor HM, et al: Effects of hematocrit and plasma proteins on human blood rheology at low shear rates. J Appl Physiol 21: 81-87, 1966.
22. Cokelet GR, Meiselman HJ: Rheological comparison of hemoglobin solutions and erythrocyte suspensions. Science 162: 275-277, 1968.
23. Dintenfass L: Internal viscosity of the red cell and a blood viscosity equation. Nature 219: 956-958, 1968.
24. Merrill EW: Rheology of blood. Physiol Rev 49: 863-888, 1969.
25. Brooks DE, Goodwin JW, Seaman GV: Interactions among erythrocytes under shear. J Appl Physiol 28: 172-177, 1970.
26. Chien S, Usami S, Dellenback RJ, Gregersen MI: Shear-dependent deformation of erythrocytes in rheology of human blood. Am J Physiol 219: 136-142, 1970.
27. Chien S, Usami S, Dellenback RJ, Bryant CA: Comparative hemorheology: Hematological implications of species differences in blood viscosity. Biorheology 8: 35-57, 1971.
28. Barbee JH: The effect of temperature on the relative viscosity of human blood. Biorheology 10: 000-5, 1973.
29. Cokelet GR: Rheology and hemodynamics. Annu Rev Physiol 42: 311-324, 1980.
30. Rogausch H: Modifications of the erythrocyte deformability alter the effect of temperature on the relative viscosity of human blood. Biorheology 19: 237-244, 1982.
31. Whittington RB, Harkness J: Whole-blood viscosity, as determined by plasma viscosity, haematocrit, and shear. Biorheology 19: 175-184, 1982.
32. Linderkamp O, Versmold HT, Riegel KP, Betke K: Contributions of red cells and plasma to blood viscosity in preterm and full-term infants and adults. Pediatrics 74: 45-51, 1984.
33. Lowe G (ed): Clinical Blood Rheology. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press, 1988.
34. Eckmann DM, Bowers S, Stecker M, Cheung AT: Hematocrit, volume expander, temperature, and shear rate effects on blood viscosity. Anesth Analg 91: 539-545, 2000.
35. Windberger U, Bartholovitsch A, Plasenzotti R, et al: Whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity and erythrocyte aggregation in nine mammalian species: Reference values and comparison of data. Exp Physiol 88: 431-440, 2003.
36. Thurston GB: Viscoelasticity of human blood. Biophys J 12: 1205-1217, 1972.
37. Thurston GB: Frequency and shear rate dependence of viscoelasticity of human blood. Biorheology 10: 375-381, 1973.
38. Copley AL, King RG, Chien S, et al: Microscopic observations of viscoelasticity of human blood in steady and oscillatory shear. Biorheology 12: 257-263, 1975.
39. Thurston GB: The viscosity and viscoelasticity of blood in small diameter tubes. Microvasc Res 11: 133-146, 1976.
40. Thurston GB: Effects of hematocrit on blood viscoelasticity and in establishing normal values. Biorheology 15: 239-249, 1978.
41. Nash GB, Johnson CS, Meiselman HJ: Influence of oxygen tension on the viscoelastic behavior of red blood cells in sickle cell disease. Blood 67: 110-118, 1986.
42. More RB, Thurston GB: Intrinsic viscoelasticity of blood cell suspensions: Effects of erythrocyte deformability. Biorheology 24: 297-309, 1987.
43. Hell KM, Balzereit A, Diebold U, Bruhn HD: Importance of blood viscoelasticity in arteriosclerosis. Angiology 40: 539-546, 1989.
44. Chmiel H, Anadere I, Walitza E: The determination of blood viscoelasticity in clinical hemorheology. Biorheology 27: 883-894, 1990.
45. Thurston GB: The elastic yield stress of human blood. Biomed Sci Instrum 29: 87-93, 1993.
46. Windberger U, Ribitsch V, Resch KL, Losert U: The viscoelasticity of blood and plasma in pig, horse, dog, ox, and sheep. J Exp Anim Sci 36: 89-95, 1994.
47. Thurston GB, Henderson NM, Jeng M: Effects of erythrocytapheresis transfusion on the viscoelasticity of sickle cell blood. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 30: 83-97, 2004.
48. Long JA, Undar A, Manning KB, Deutsch S: Viscoelasticity of pediatric blood and its implications for the testing of a pulsatile pediatric blood pump. ASAIO J 51: 563-566, 2005.
49. Nosé Y: Recommended practice for assessment of hemolysis in continuous flow blood pumps. ASTM Stand News 1998;F04-40-101.
50. Brookshier KK, Tarbell JM: Effect of hematocrit on wall shear rate in oscillatory flow: Do the elastic properties of blood play a role? Biorheology 28: 569-587, 1991.
51. Klaus S, Korfer S, Mottaghy K, et al: In vitro blood damage by high shear flow: human versus porcine blood. Int J Artif Organs 25: 306-312, 2002.
52. Takatani S, Hoshi H, Tajima K, et al: Feasibility of a miniature centrifugal rotary blood pump for low-flow circulation in children and infants. ASAIO J 51: 557-562, 2005.
53. Tamari Y, Lee-Sensiba K, Leonard EF, et al: The effects of pressure and flow on hemolysis caused by Bio-Medicus centrifugal pumps and roller pumps: Guidelines for choosing a blood pump. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 106: 997-1007, 1993.
54. Undar A, Eichstaedt HC, Masai T, et al: Precise quantification of pulsatility is a necessity for direct comparisons of six different pediatric heart-lung machines in a neonatal CPB model. ASAIO J 51: 600-603, 2005.
55. Nemoto M: Experimental evaluation of the influence of complete artificial circulation on renal circulation and tissue metabolism: Comparative study of pulsatile vs nonpulsatile circulation. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 9: 355-364, 2003.
56. Lee HS, Rho YR, Lee HS, et al: In vivo evaluation of the pulsatile ECLS system. J Artif Organs 6: 25-29, 2003.
57. Undar A, Vaughn WK, Calhoon JH: The effects of cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest on blood viscoelasticity and cerebral blood flow in a neonatal piglet model. Perfusion 15: 121-128, 2000.
58. Baldwin JT, Borovetz HS, Duncan BW, et al: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Pediatric Circulatory Support Program. Circulation 113: 147-155, 2006.
59. Undar A: Effect of hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass on blood viscoelasticity in pediatric cardiac patients. ASAIO J 51: 522-524, 2005.
60. Undar A, Vaughn WK: Effects of mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass on blood viscoelasticity in coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Artif Organs 26: 964-966, 2002.
61. Kameneva MV, Undar A, Antaki JF, et al: Decrease in red blood cell deformability caused by hypothermia, hemodilution, and mechanical stress: Factors related to cardiopulmonary bypass. ASAIO J 45: 307-310, 1999.