Universality in dynamical formation of entanglement for quantum chaos

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2006, Pages

  Kubotani, Hiroto ^a   Toda, Mikito ^b   Adachi, Satoshi ^c  

^a KANAGAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NARA WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAOS THEORY; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; GROUND STATE; MATRIX ALGEBRA; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ENTANGLEMENT; QUANTUM CHAOS; SCHMIDT EIGENVALUES;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 33748679151     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.032314     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 47, 777 (1935).
2. J. S. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) PYCSAP 0554-128X 10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 1, 195 (1964).
3. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
4. E. Joos and H. D. Zeh, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter ZPCMDN 0722-3277 59, 273 (1985).
5. W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1862 26, 1862 (1982);
6. W. H. Zurek, Phys. Today PHTOAD 0031-9228 10.1103/PhysRevD.24.151610. 1103/PhysRevD.26.1862 44, 36 (1991).
7. S. Adachi, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information Physics (Kyushu Institute of Technology, Iizuka, 1992), pp. 76-83.
8. H. Kubotani, T. Okamura, and M. Sakagami, Physica A PHYADX 0378-4371 10.1016/0378-4371(94)00297-7 214, 560 (1995);
9. M. Sakagami, H. Kubotani, and T. Okamura, Prog. Theor. Phys. PTPKAV 0033-068X 10.1143/PTP.95.703 95, 703 (1996);
10. H. Kubotani and M. Den, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 319, 475 (2003).
11. See, e.g., K. Furuya, M. C. Nemes, and G. Q. Pellegrino, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5524 80, 5524 (1998);
12. P. A. Miller and S. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.1542 60, 1542 (1999);
13. A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.64. 036207 64, 036207 (2001);
14. A. Tanaka, H. Fujisaki, and T. Miyadera, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.045201 66, 045201 (R) (2002);
15. H. Fujisaki, T. Miyadera, and A. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.066201 67, 066201 (2003);
16. A. J. Scott and C. M. Caves, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/36/36/308 36, 9553 (2003);
17. S. Bettelli and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.054303 67, 054303 (2003);
18. J. N. Bandyopadhyay and A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.016201 69, 016201 (2004);
19. P. Jacquod, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92. 150403 92, 150403 (2004).
20. B. Bronk, J. Math. Phys. JMAPAQ 0022-2488 10.1063/1.1704111 5, 215 (1965).
21. F. Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001).
22. M. L. Mehta, Random Matrices, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1991).
23. G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations, 3rd ed. (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1996).
24. When Bronk first obtained the formula 5, he used alternatively the maximum entropy principle for non-negative Hermite matrices A† A.
25. H. Kubotani, M. Toda, and M. Adachi (unpublished).
26. S. Adachi and S. Iida (unpublished). One of us (S. A.) and S. Iida have derived Eq. 9 without going through the joint distribution in 1990's.
27. T. Nagao and K. Slevin, J. Math. Phys. JMAPAQ 0022-2488 10.1063/1.530157 34, 2075 (1993).
28. J. N. Bandyopadhyay and A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.060402 89, 060402 (2002). Recently, the authors kindly informed us of this paper. The paper compared the one-level density for the ensemble of stationary states in a coupled kicked top model to the Laguerre unitary ensemble, and also discussed non-square N×M random matrices.
29. K. Zyczkowski and H. J. Sommers, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/335 34, 7111 (2001). The restricted trace ensemble corresponds to the microcanonical one in the statistical physics, while the Laguerre unitary ensemble does to the canonical one.