Lattice-based dynamic and overlapping taxonomies: The case of epistemic communities

Scientometrics

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 429-447

  Roth, Camille ^a   Bourgine, Paul ^a  

^a Centre de Recherche en Epistemologie Appliquee Ecole Polytechnique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748666846     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0161-6     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ARCHAMBAULT, E., GAGNE, E. V. (2004), L'utilisation de la bibliométrie dans les sciences sociales et les humanités, Technical report, Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines du Canada.
2. BARBUT, M., MONJARDET, B. (1970), Algèbre et Combinatoire, volume II, Hachette, Paris.
3. BELOHLAVEK, R. (2000), Fuzzy Galois connections and fuzzy concept lattices: From binary relations to conceptual structures, In: V. NOVAK, I. PERFILEVA (Eds), Discovering tlie World with Fuzzy Logic, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 462-494.
4. BERLIN, B. (1992), Ethnobiological Classification - Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
5. BIRKHOFF, G. (1948), Lattice Theory, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
6. BRADBURY, J. (2004), Small fish, big science, PLoS Biology, 2 (5): 568-572.
7. GALLON, M., LAW, J., RIP, A. (1986), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, MacMillan Press,London.
8. COHENDET, P., KIRMAN, A., ZIMMERMANN, J.-B. (2003), Emergence, formation et dynamique des réseaux - modèles de la morphogenèse, Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 103 (2-3): 15-42.
9. COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY (1994, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003), Zebrafish development & genetics, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
10. COWAN, R., DAVID, P. A., FORAY, D. (2000), The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness, Industrial & Corporate Change, 9 (2): 212-253.
11. DOOLEY, K., ZON, L. I. (2000), Zebrafish: a model system for the study of human disease, Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 10 (3): 252-256.
12. DUPOUET, O., COHENDET, P., CREPLET, F. (2001), Economics with Heterogenous Agents, chapter Organisational innovation, communities of practice and epistemic communities: the case of Linux, Springer, Berlin.
13. DUQUENNE, V., CHABERT, C., CHERFOUH, A., DOYEN, A.-L., DELABAR, J.-M., PICKERING, D. (2003), Structuration of phenotypes and genotypes through Galois lattices and implications., Applied Artificial Intelligence, 17 (3): 243-256.
14. FREEMAN, L. C., WHITE, D. R. (1993), Using Galois lattices to represent network data, Sociological Methodology, 23: 127-146.
15. GODIN, R., MILI, H., MINEAU, G. W., MISSAOUI, R., ARFI, A., CHAU, T.-T. (1998), Design of class hierarchies based on concept (Galois) lattices, Theory and Practice of Object Systems (TAPOS),4(2): 117-134.
16. GRUNWALD, D. J., ETSEN, J. S. (2002), Headwaters of the zebrafish - emergence of a new model vertebrate, Nature Rev. Genetics, 3 (9): 717-724.
17. HAAS, P. (1992), Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination, International Organization, 46 (1): 1-35.
18. IDE, N., VÉRONIS, J. (1998), Word sense disambiguation: The state of the art, Computational Linguistics, 24 (1): 1-40.
19. INTERNATIONAL HUMAN GENOME SEQUENCING CONSORTIUM (2001), Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome, Nature, 409: 860-921.
20. JAIN, A. K., MURTY, M. N., FLYNN, P. J. (1999), Data clustering: a review, ACM Computing Surveys, 31 (3): 264-323.
21. JOHNSON, S. C. (1967), Hierarchical clustering schemes, Psychometrika, 2: 241-254.
22. KLEIN, J. T. (1990), Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice, Wayne State University Press, Detroit, MI.
23. KOHONEN, T. (2000), Self-Organizing Maps, Springer, Berlin, 3rd edition.
24. KREUZMAN, H. (2001), A co-citation analysis of representative authors in philosophy: Examining the rela-tionship between epistemologists and philosophers of science, Scientometrics, 51 (3): 525-539.
25. KUHN, T. S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2nd edition.
26. KUZNETSOV, S. O., OBIEDKOV, S. A. (2002), Comparing performance of algorithms for generating concept lattices, Journalof Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 14 (2-3): 189-216.
27. LEYDESDORFF, L. (1991), In search of epistemic networks, Social Studies of Science, 21: 75-110.
28. LEYDESDORFF, L. (1997), Why words and co-words cannot map the development of the sciences, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (5): 418-427.
29. LOPEZ, A., ATRAN, S., COLEY, J. D., MEDIN, D. L., SMITH, E. E. (1997), The tree of life: Universal and cultural features of folkbiological taxonomies and inductions, Cognitive Psychology, 32 (3): 251-295.
30. LORRAIN, F., WHITE, H. C. (1971), Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1 (49-80).
31. MCCAIN, K. W. (1986), Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37 (3): 111-122.
32. MCCAIN, K. W., VERNER, J. M., HISLOP, G. W., EVANCO, W., COLE, V. (2005), The use of bibliometric and Knowledge Elicitation techniques to map a knowledge domain: Software Engineering in the 1990s, Scientometrics, 65 (1): 131-144.
33. MONJARDET, B. (2003), The presence of lattice theory in discrete problems of mathematical social sciences. Why? Mathematical Social Sciences, 46 (2): 103-144.
34. NEWMAN, M. E. J. (2004), Detecting community structure in networks, European Physical Journal B, 38: 321-330.
35. NOYONS, E. C. M., VAN RAAN, A. F. J. (1998), Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic per-spective: self-organized structuring to map neural network research, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49 (1): 68-81.
36. PERSSON, O., BECKMANN, M. (1995), Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialties, Scientometrics, 33 (3): 351-366.
37. ROSCH, E., LLOYD, B. (1978), Cognition and categorization, American Psychologist, 44 (12): 1468-1481.
38. ROTH, C., BOURGINE, P. (2005), Epistemic communities: Description and hierarchic categorization, Mathematical Population Studies, 12(2): 107-130.
39. SALTON, G., WONG, A., YANG, C. S. (1975), Vector space model for automatic indexing, Communications of the ACM, 18 (11): 613-620.
40. SOKAL, R. R., SNEATH, P. H. A. (1963), Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco,CA.
41. STUMME, G., TAOUIL, R., BASTIDE, Y., PASQUIER, N., LAKHAL, L. (2002), Computing iceberg concept lattices with TITANIC, Data and Knowledge Engineering, 42: 189-222.
42. WASSERMAN, S., FAUST, K. (1994), Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
43. WHITE, D. R., SPUFFORD, P. (2006), Medieval to Modern: Civilizations as Dynamic Networks, Book Ms.
44. WHITE, H. C., BOORMAN, S. A., BREIGER, R. L. (1976), Social-structure from multiple networks. I: Block-models of roles and positions, American Journal of Sociology, 81: 730-780.
45. WHITTAKER, R. H. (1969), New concepts of kingdoms of organisms, Science, 163: 150-160.
46. WILLE, R. (1982), Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts, In: I. RIVAL (Ed.) Ordered Sets, Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel, pp. 445-470.
47. WILLE, R. (1992), Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems, Computers Mathematics and Applications, 23: 493.