Learning objects in public and higher education

Innovations in Instructional Technology: Essays in Honor of M. David Merrill

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-9

  Wiley, David A ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748658268     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613684     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Bloom B. S.,&Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green.
2. Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 4-12.
3. Downes, S. (2004). Resource profiles. Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2004(5). Special Issue on the Educational SemanticWeb. Available: http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2004/5
4. Driscoll, M. P. (1994). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
5. Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
6. Gibbons, A. S., Nelson, J.,&Richards, R. (2000). The nature and origin of instructional objects. In D. A.Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Retrieved April 2, 2004, from http://www.reusability.org/read/chapters/gibbons.doc
7. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R. T. (1997). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8. Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59.
9. Merrill, M.D., Li, Z.,&Jones, M. K. (1991). Instructional transaction theory: An introduction. Educational Technology, 31(6), 7-12.
10. Nelson, L. M. (1999). Collaborative problem solving. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. (pp. 241-267). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Press,W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., & Vetterling,W. T. (1992). Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
12. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Roschelle, J., DiGiano, C., Chung, M., Repenning, A., Tager, S.,&Treinen, M. (2000). Reusability and interoperability of tools for mathematics learning: Lessons from the ESCOT project. Retrieved April 2, 2004, from http://www.escot.org/escot/docs/ISA2000-Reusability%20Reprint.pdf
14. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative Learning: Theory, research, and Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. South, J., & Monson, D. (2000). A university-wide system for creating, capturing, and delivering learning objects. In D. A.Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Retrieved April 2, 2004 from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/south.doc
16. Wiley, D. A. (2002). The coming collision between automated instruction and social constructivism. Retrieved April 2, 2004 from http://wiley.ed.usu.edu/docs/collision_09.doc
17. Wiley, D. A., & Edwards, E. K. (2002). Online self-organizing social systems: The decentralized future of online learning. Quarterly Reviewof Distance Education, 3(1), 33-46.