The new urban governance: Processes for engaging citizens and stakeholders

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 815-826

  Bingham, Lisa Blomgren ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; POLICY MAKING; URBAN POLITICS;

EID: 33748615422     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: 15411338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00234.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2. Aman, A. C., Jr. (2004). The democracy deficit: Taming globalization through law reform. New York: New York University Press.
3. Beierle, T. C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in practice: Public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
4. Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O'Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 547-558.
5. Bogason, P., & Musso, J. A. (2006). Symposium: Democratic network governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36 (1), 3-114.
6. Booher, D. E. (2004). Collaborative governance practices and democracy. National Civic Review, 93(4), 32-46.
7. Carpenter, S. L., & Kennedy, W. J. D. (1988). Managing public disputes: A practical guide to handling conflict and reaching agreements. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Dukes, E. F., Piscolish, M. A., & Stephens, J. B. (2000). Reaching for higher ground in conflict resolution: Tools for powerful groups and communities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Durant, R. F., Fiorino, D. J., & O'Leary, R. (Eds.). (2004). Environmental governance reconsidered: Challenges, choices, and opportunities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes (2nd ed.). New York: Penguin Press.
11. Frederickson, H. G. (1999). The repositioning of American public administration. PS: Political Science and Politics, 32(4), 701-711.
12. Fung, A. (in press). Democracy and the policy process. In M. Rein, M. Moran, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), Oxford handbook of public policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13. Fung, A., & Wright, E. Olin (Eds.). (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso Press.
14. Galanter, M. (2004). The vanishing trial: An examination of trials and related matters in federal and state courts. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1(3), 459-480.
15. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Institute for Environmental Negotiation, University of Virginia. (2002). A stream corridor protection strategy for local government. Charlottesville: University of Virginia.
17. Jones, T. S. (Ed.). (2004). Conflict resolution in the field: Special symposium. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 22(1-2), 1-320.
18. Kathi, P. C., & Cooper, Terry. (2005). Democratizing the administrative state: Connecting neighborhood councils and city agencies. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 559-567.
19. Kettl, D. F. (2002). The transformation of governance: Public administration for twenty-first century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
21. Lukensmeyer, C. J., & Torres, L. H. (2006). Public deliberation: A manager's guide to citizen engagement. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
22. Moore, C. W. (2003). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. O'Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (Eds.). (2003). The promise and performance of environmental conflict resolution. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
24. Policy Consensus Initiative. (2001). States mediating change: Improving governance through collaboration. Santa Fe, NM, and Bismarck, ND: Policy Consensus Initiative.
25. Portney, K. (2005). Civic engagement and sustainable cities in the United States. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 579-591.
26. Salamon, L. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Schwarz, R. (2002). The skilled facilitator: A comprehensive resource for consultants, facilitators, managers, trainers, and coaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Senger, J. M. (2003). Federal dispute resolution: Using ADR with the United States government. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Sorensen, E. (2006). Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36 (1), 98-114.
30. Susskind, L., & Cruikshank, J. (1987). Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.
31. Torres, L. H. (2003). Deliberative democracy: A survey of the field, a report prepared for the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Washington, DC: AmericaSpeaks.
32. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
33. Yankelovich, D. (1991). Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
34. Williamson, A. (2004). Mapping public deliberation. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government.