Diversity of three ant guilds in shade and sun coffee plantations and forests of risaralda;Diversidad de tres gremios de hormigas en cafe tales de so rubra, de sol y bosques de risaralda

Revista Colombiana de Entomologia

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 89-96

  Rivera, Leonardo ^a   Armbrecht, Inge ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DEL VALLE   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Agroecosystem; Coffee management; Conservation; Myrmecofauna; Winkler

Indexed keywords

FORMICIDAE;

EID: 33748612002     PISSN: 01200488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. AGOSTI, D.; MAJER, J. D.; ALONSO, L. E.; SCHULTS, T. R. 2000. Ants: Standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity: Preface. Smithsonian Institution. Washington, D. C.
2. ANDERSEN, A. 1997. Using ants bioindicators: Multiscale issues in ant community ecology. Conservation Ecology 1 (1): 8.
3. ANDERSEM, A. N. 2000. Global Ecology of rain forest ants, functional groups in relation to environmental stress and disturbance, p. 25-34. En: D. Agosti, J. D. Majer, I. E. Alonso, & T. R. Shults (eds.). Ants: Standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity: Smithsonian Institution. Washington, D. C.
4. ARMBRECHT, I.; FERFECTO I. 2003. Litter-twig dwelling ant species richness and preda-tion potential within a forest fragment and neighboring coffee plantations of contrasting habitat quality in Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 97: 107-115.
5. BEER, J. 1987. Advantages, disadvantages and desirable characteristics of shade trees for coffee, cocoa and tea. Agroforestry Systems 5: 3-13.
6. BEER, J.; MUSCHELER, R.; KASS, D.; SOMARRIBA, E. 1998. Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Agroforestry Systems 38: 139-164.
7. BOLETÍN DE LA SOC1EDAD AGROPECUAR1A TATAMÁ. 2002. E.mail: cafeapia@pereira. multi.net.co
8. BOLTON, B. 1994. Identification guide to the ant genera of the word. Harvard University press. Cambridge, Massachusetts. 222 p.
9. COLWELL, R. K. 1997. User's guide to Estimates 6. Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.
10. COLWELL, R. R.; CODDINGTON, J. A. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (serie B). 345: 101.
11. DELABIE, J. H.; AGOSTl, D.; DO NASCIMENTO, I. C. 2000. Litter ant communities of Brazilian Atlantic rain forest region. Chapter 1. p. 1-17. En: D. Agosti, J. D. Majer, L. Alonso & T. Schultz (eds.). Sampling Ground-dwelling ants: case studies from the world's rain forests. Curtin University School of Environmental Biology Bulletin. No. 18. Perth, Australia.
12. GOTELLI, N. J.; COLWELL, R. K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters. 4:379-391.
13. HOLLDOBLER, B.; WILSON, E. O. 1990. The ants. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachussets. 732 p.
14. IBARRA-NÚÑEZ, G. 1990. Los artrópodos aso-ciados a cafetos en un cafetal mixto del Soconusco, Chiapas, México. Folia entomológica Mexicans 79: 207-231.
15. LUDWING, J. A.; REYNOLDS, J. 1988. Statistical ecology: a primer methods and computing. Wiley, hew York.
16. MAJER, J. D. 1993. Comparison of the arboreal ant mosaic in Ghana, Brazil, Papua New Guinea and Australia -its structure and influence on arthropod diversity, p. 115-141. En: J. LaSalle & I. D. Gauld (eds.). Hymenoptera and Biodiversity, CAB international. Wallingford, United Kingdom.
17. MOQUEL, R; TOLEDO, V. M. 1999. Biodiversity conservation in traditional systems of Mexico. Conservation Biology 13: 11-21.
18. NESTEL, D.; DICKSCHEN, F; ALTIERI, M. A. 1993. Diversity patterns of soil macro-Coleoptera in Mexican shaded and unshaded coffee agroecosystems: an indication of habitat perturbation. Biodiversity and Conservation 2: 70-78.
19. OSBORN, F; GOITIA, W.; CABRERA, M.; JAFFÉ, K. 1998. Ants, plants and butterflies as diversity indicators: Comparison between strata at six forest sites in Venezuela. Fauna and Environment 1: 59-64.
20. PAOLETTI, M. G.; PIMENTEL, D.; STINNER, B. R.; STINNER, D. 1992. Agroecosystem biodiversity: matching production and conservation biology. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 40: 3-23.
21. PERFECTO, I.; VAN DERMEER, J. 1994. Understanding biodiversity loss in agroecosystems: Reduction of ant diversity resulting from transformation of the coffee ecosystem in Costa Rica. Entomological trends in agricultural science. 2: 7-13.
22. PERFECTO, I.; ARMBRECMT, I. 2003. Technological change and biodiversity in the coffee agroecosystem of Nothern Latin America (Chapter 6). p. 159-194. En: J. Vandermeer (ed.). Tropical agroecosystems CRC Press LLC. Boca Raton, Florida.
23. PERFECTO, I.; RICE, R. A.; GREENBERG, R.; VAN DER VOORT, M. E. 1996. Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. Bioscience 46: 598-608.
24. PERFECTO, I.; VANDERMEER, J.; HANSON, F; CARTIN, V. 1997. Arthropod biodiversity loss and the transformation of a tropical agro-ecosystem. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 935-945.
25. RAMOS-SUÁREZ, M. P.; MORALES, H.; RUIZ-MONTOYA, L.; SOTO-PINTO, L.; ROJAS-FERNÁNDEZ, P. 2002. ¿Se mantiene la diversidad de hormigas con el cambio de bosque mesófilo a cafetales?. p. 16-30. En: Monro & M. C. Peha (eds.). Actas del Sim-posio café y Biodiversidad. Revista Protectión Vegetal, Año 12 (2) ISBN 056501816. Edición Especial. San Salvador.
26. RICE, A.; DRENNING, J. 2003. Manual de café bajo sombra. Smithsonian Migratory Bird center (bird friendly). National Zoological Park, Washington, D.C. www.si.edu/stnbc. 62 p.
27. SWIFT, M.; VANDERMEER, J.; RAMAKRISHNAN, P. S.; ANDERSON, C; ONG, K.; HAWKINS, A. 1996. Biodiversity and agroecosystem function, p 261-298. En: H.A. Mooney, J. H. Cushman, E. Medina, O. E. Sala & E. D. Schulze (eds.). Functional Roles of Biodiversity: a global perspective. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.