Lack of trade-off between direct and indirect defence against grape powdery mildew in riverbank grape

Ecological Entomology

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 415-422

  English Loeb, Greg ^a   Norton, Andrew ^a,b  

^a New York State Agricultural Experiment Station   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological control; Cost of defence; Defence mutualism; Domatia; Orthotydeus lambi; Vitaceae

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FUNGAL DISEASE; GENOTYPE; MITE; PLANT DEFENSE; POPULATION DENSITY; RIVER BANK; TRADE-OFF; VINE;

NORTH AMERICA;

ACARI; ERYSIPHALES; ERYSIPHE NECATOR; FUNGI; NECATOR; ORTHOTYDEUS LAMBI; VITACEAE; VITIS RIPARIA; VITIS SP.;

EID: 33748588744     PISSN: 03076946     EISSN: 13652311     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00795.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Agrawal, A.A. (2000) Mechanisms, ecological consequences and agricultural implications of tri-trophic interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 3, 329-335.
2. Agrawal, A.A., Janssen, A., Bruin, J., Posthumus, M.A. & Sabelis, M.W. (2002) An ecological cost of plant defence: attractiveness of bitter cucumber plants to natural enemies of herbivores. Ecology Letters, 5, 377-385.
3. Ågren, J., Danell, K., Elmqvist, T., Ericson, L. & Hjältén, J. (1999) Sexual dimorphism and biotic interactions. Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants (ed. by M.A. Geber, T.E. Dawson and L.F. Delph), pp. 217-246. Springer-Verlag, New York.
4. Bazzaz, F.A., Chiariello, N.R., Coley, P.D. & Pitelka, L.F. (1987) Allocating resources to reproduction and defence. Biocience, 37, 58-67.
5. Bieza, K. & Lois, R. (2001) An Arabidopsis mutant tolerant to lethal ultraviolet-B levels shows constitutively elevated accumulation of flavonoids and other phenolics. Plant Physiology, 126, 1105-1115.
6. Briggs, M.A. & Schultz, J.C. (1990) Chemical defence production in Lotus corniculatus L. II. Trade-offs among growth, reproduction and defence. Oeologia, 83, 32-37.
7. Carroll, J.E. & Wilcox, W.F. (2003) Effect of humidity on the development of grapevine powdery mildew. Phytopathology, 93, 1137-1144.
8. Coley, P.D., Bryant, J.P. & Chapin, F.S. III (1985) Resource availability and plant anti-herbivore defence. Science, 230, 895-899.
9. Delp, C.J. (1954) Effect of temperature and humidity on the grape powdery mildew fungus. Phytopathology, 44, 615-626.
10. Ehleringer, J. (1980) Leaf morphology and reflectance in relation to water and temperature stress. Adaptations of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress (ed. by N.C. Turner and P.J. Kramer), pp. 295-308. John Wiley Sons, New York
11. English-Loeb, G.M., Karban, R. & Walker, M.A. (1998) Genotypic variation in constitutive and induced resistance in grapes against spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) herbivores. Environmental Entomology, 27, 297-304.
12. English-Loeb, G.M., Norton, A.P., Gadoury, D.M., Seem, R.C. & Wilcox, W.F. (1999) Control of powdery mildew in wild and cultivated grapes by a Tydeid mite. Biological Control, 14, 97-103.
13. English-Loeb, G., Norton, A.P. & Walker, M.A. (2002) Behavioral and population consequences of acarodomatia in grapes on phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) and implications for plant breeding. Entomologia Experimantalis et Applicata, 104, 307-319.
14. English-Loeb, G., Norton, A.P., Gadoury, D., Seem, R. & Wilcox, W. (2005) Tri-trophic interactions among grapevines, a fungal pathogen and a mycophagous mite. Ecological Applications, 15, 1679-1688.
15. Feeny, P. (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defence. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, 10, 1-40.
16. Fiala, B., Maschwitz, U., Pong, T.Y. & Hellag, A.J. (1989) Studies of a south east Asian ant-plant association: Protection of Macaranga trees by Crematogaster borneensis. Oecologia, 79, 463-470.
17. Fiala, B., Grunsky, H., Maschwitz, U. & Linsenmair, K.E. (1994) Diversity of ant-plant interactions: protective efficacy in Macaranga species with different degrees of ant association. Oecologia, 97, 186-192.
18. Gaume, L., McKey, D. & Anstett, M.C. (1997) Benefits conferred by 'timid' ants: active anti-herbivore protection of the rainforest tree Leonardoza africana by the minute ant Petalomyrmex phylax. Oecologia, 112, 209-216.
19. Gulmon, S.L. & Mooney, H.A. (1986) Costs of defence on plant productivity. On the Economy of Plant Form and Function (ed. by T.J. Givnish), pp. 681-698. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. Heil, M., Fiala, B., Linsenmair, K.E., Zotz, G. & Menke, P. (1997) Food body production in Macaranga triloba (Euphorbiaceae): a plant investment in anti-herbivore defence via symbiotic ant partners. Journal of Ecology, 85, 847-861.
21. Heil, M., Fiala, B., Maschwitz, U. & Linsenmair, K.E. (2001) On benefi ts of indirect defence: short- and long-term studies in antiherbivore protection via mutualistic ants. Oecologia, 126, 395-403.
22. Heil, M., Delsinne, T., Hilpert, A., Schürkens, S., Andary, C., Linsenmair, K.E., Sousa, M. & McKey, D. (2002) Reduced chemical defence in ant-plants? A critical re-evaluation of a widely accepted hypothesis. Oikos, 90, 457-468.
23. Herms, D.A. & Mattson, W.J. (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quarterly Review Biology, 67, 183-236.
24. Janzen, D.H. (1966) Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution, 20, 249-275.
25. Kaptur, S. (1992) Extrafloral nectary-mediated interactions between insects and plants. Insect-Plant Interactions (ed. by E. Bernays), Vol. 4, pp. 81-129. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
26. Karban, R., English-Loeb, G., Walker, M.A. & Thaler, J. (1995) Abundance of phytoseiid mites on Vitis species: effects of leaf hairs, domatia, prey abundance and plant phylogeny. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 19, 189-197.
27. Koricheva, J., Nykänen, H. & Gianoli, E. (2004) Meta-analysis of trade-offs among plant antiherbivore defences: are plants jacks-of-all-trades, masters of all? American Naturalist, 163, E64-E75.
28. Letourneau, D.K. (1998) Ants, stem-borers, and fungal pathogens: Experimental tests of a fitness advantage in Piper ant-plants. Ecology, 79, 593-603.
29. Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W. & Wolfinger, R.D. (1996) SAS Systems for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
30. Lundströem, A.N. (1887) Von Domatien. Pflanzenbiolohische studien. II. Die anpassung der pflanzen and thiere. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum Upsaliensis Series, 3 (13), 1-87.
31. Madden, D. & Young, T.P. (1992) Ants as alternative defences in spinescent Acacia drepanolobium. Oecologia, 91, 235-238.
32. Mauricio, R. (1998) Cost of resistance to natural enemies in field populations of the annual plant Arabidopsis thaliana. American Naturalist, 151, 20-28.
33. McKey, D. (1974) Adaptive patterns in alkaloid physiology. American Naturalist, 108, 305-320.
34. McMurtry, J.A., Huffaker, C.B. & van de Vrie, M. (1970) Ecology of tetranichid mites and their natural enemies: a review. I. Tetranychid enemies: their biological characters and the impact of spray practices. Hilgardia, 40, 331-390.
35. Moore, M.O. (1991) Classification and systematics of eastern north American Vitis L. (Vitaceae) north of Mexico. SIDAI, 14, 339-367.
36. Norton, A.P., English-Loeb, G., Gadoury, D.M. & Seem, R.C. (2000) Mycophagous mites and foliar pathogens: leaf domatia mediate tritrophic interactions in grapes. Ecology, 81, 490-499.
37. O'Dowd, D.J. & Willson, M.F. (1989) Leaf domatia and mites on Australasian plants: ecological and evolutionary implications. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 37, 191-236.
38. O'Dowd, D.J. & Willson, M.F. (1991) Associations between mites and leaf domatia. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 179-182.
39. Romeo, J.T. (1998) Functional multiplicity among non-protein amino acids in mimosoid legumes: a case against redundancy. Ecoscience, 5, 287-294.
40. Romero, G.Q. & Benson, W.W. (2005) Biotic interactions of mites, plants and leaf domatia. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 8, 436-440.
41. SAS Institute (1997) SAS/STAT® Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
42. SAS Institute (2000) JMP Statistics and Graphics Guide, Version 4. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
43. Simms, E.L. (1992) Cost of plant resistance to herbivores. Plant Resistance: Ecology and Evolution (ed. by R. Fritz and E.L. Simms), pp. 392-425. University Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
44. Stacey, D.A., Thomas, M.B., Blanford, S., Pell, J.K., Pugh, C. & Fellowes, M.D.E. (2003) Genotype and temperature influence pea aphid resistance to a fungal entomopathogen. Physiological Entomology, 28, 75-81.
45. Steward, J.L. & Keeler, K.H. (1988) Are there trade-offs among antiherbivore defences in Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae)? Oikos, 53, 79-86.
46. Strauss, S.Y., Rudgers, J.A., Lau, J.A. & Irwin, R.E. (2002) Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 278-285.
47. Thaler, J.S., Fidantsef, A.L., Duffey, S.S. & Bostock, R.M. (1999) Trade-offs in plant defence against pathogens and herbivores: a field demonstration of chemical elicitors of induced resistance. Journal Chemical Ecology, 25, 1597-1609.
48. Vasconcelos, H.L. (1991) Mutualism between Maieta guianensis Aubl., a myrmecophytic melastome, and one of its ant inhabitants: ant protection against insect herbivores. Oecologia, 87, 295-298.
49. Walter, D.E. (1996) Living on leaves: mites, tomenta, and leaf domatia. Annual Review of Entomology, 41, 101-114.
50. Willson, M.F. (1991) Foliar shelters for mites in the eastern deciduous forest. American Midland Naturalist, 126, 111-117.