Comparison of Mandibular Rami Width in Patients With Prognathism and Retrognathia

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 64, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1506-1509

  Ribeiro, Danilo P B ^a   Gandelmann, Italo H A ^a   Medeiros, Paulo J ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; PROGNATHIA; RETROGNATHIA; THICKNESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MANDIBLE; PROGNATHISM; RETROGNATHISM; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33748572244     PISSN: 02782391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ozawa Y., Shibahara T., Takagi T., et al. Surgical simulation of Class III edentulous patient using a 3D craniofacial model: Report of a case. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 41 (2000) 73
2. Nishioka G.J., and Aragon S.B. Modified sagittal split technique for patients with high lingula. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47 (1989) 426
3. Smith B.R., Rajchel J.L., Waite D.E., et al. Mandibular ramus anatomy as it relates to the medial osteotomy of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49 (1991) 112
4. Hallikainen D., Iizuka T., and Lindqvist C. Cross-sectional tomography in evaluation of patients undergoing sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50 (1992) 1269
5. Rajchel J., Ellis E., and Fonseca R.J. The anatomical location of the mandibular canal: Its relationship to the sagittal ramus osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1 (1986) 37
6. Kohakura S., Kasai K., Ohno I., et al. Relationship between maxillofacial morphology and morphological characteristics of vertical sections of the mandible obtained by CT scanning. J NihonUniv Sch Dent 39 (1997) 71
7. Tsunori M., Mashita M., and Kasai K. Relationship between facial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning. Angle Orthod 68 (1997) 557
8. Muto T., Shigeo K., Yamamoto K., et al. Computed tomography morphology of the mandibular ramus in prognathism: Effect on the medial osteotomy of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61 (2003) 89
9. Alder M.E., Deahl S.T., and Matteson S.R. Clinical usefulness of two-dimensional reformatted and three-dimensionally rendered computerized tomographic images: Literature review and a survey of surgeons' opinions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53 (1995) 375
10. Klinge B., Petersson A., and Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: Comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 4 (1989) 327
11. Ylikontiola L., Moberg K., Huumonen S., et al. Comparison of three radiographic methods used to locate the mandibular canal in the buccolingual direction before bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 93 (2002) 736
12. Yune H.Y. Two-dimensional-three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography techniques. Dent Clin North Am 37 (1993) 613
13. Kim H.J., Lee H.Y., Chung I.H., et al. Mandibular anatomy related to sagittal split ramus osteotomy in Koreans. Yonsei Med J 38 (1997) 19
14. Epker B.N., Stella J.P., and Fish L.C. Dentofacial Deformities - Integrated Orthodontic and Surgical Correction Vol II (1996), Mosby-Year Book, St Louis, MO 569-1183