A cautionary note on appropriate statistical methods to compare dose responses of methionine sources

Poultry Science

Volumn 85, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1511-1512

  Piepho, H P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748552298     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.9.1511     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Kratzer, D. D., and R. C. Littell. 2006. Appropriate statistical methods to compare dose responses of methionine sources. Poult. Sci. 85:947-954.
2. SAS Instit. 1999. SAS/SAT User's Guide. Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
3. Seber, G. A. F., and C. J. Wild. 1989. Nonlinear Regression. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, NY.
4. van Houwelingen, H. C., L. R. Arends, and T. Stijnen. 2002. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: Multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat. Med. 21:589-624.