Appropriate statistical methods to compare dose responses of methionine sources

Poultry Science

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 947-954

  Kratzer, D D ^a   Littell, R C ^b  

^a DBA   (United States)

^b University of Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

2 hydroxy 4(methylthio) butanoic acid; Broiler; DL methionine; Layer; Turkey

Indexed keywords

METHIONINE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BIOAVAILABILITY; CHICKEN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; DOSE RESPONSE; INTESTINE ABSORPTION; METABOLISM; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; STATISTICAL MODEL; TURKEY (BIRD);

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITION PHYSIOLOGY; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL AVAILABILITY; CHICKENS; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; INTESTINAL ABSORPTION; METHIONINE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; TURKEYS;

EID: 33745095064     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.5.947     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Balnave, D., and J. Brake. 2004. Evidence supporting the hypothesis that ambient temperature and dietary composition influence the relative efficacy of methionine and its hydroxy analogues for broilers: A review. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 13:693-700.
2. Bird, F. H. 1952. A comparison of methionine and two of its analogues in the nutrition of the chick. Poult. Sci. 31:1095-1096.
3. Boebel, K. P., and D. H. Baker. 1980. Utilization of the D- and L-isomers of methionine and methionine hydroxy analog as determined by chick assay. J. Nutr. 110:959-964.
4. Conover, W. J. 1980. Practical nonparametric statistics. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
5. De Groote, G., G. Huygebaert, D. C. Bruyer, and M. Vanbelle. 1990. Efficacy of the dimeric form of methionine hydroxy analog free acid as determined by chick bioassay. Ann. Zootech. 39:45-51.
6. Dibner, J. J. 2003. Review of the metabolism of DL-2-hydroxy-4- methylthio-butanoic acid. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 59:99-110.
7. Esteve-Garcia, E., and L. L. Llaurado. 1997. Performance, breast meat yield and abdominal fat deposition of male broiler chicken fed diets supplemented with DL-methionine and DL-methionine hydroxy analogue free acid. Br. Poult. Sci. 38:397-404.
8. Finney, D. J. 1978. Statistical Method in Biological Assay. 3rd ed. Griffin, London, UK.
9. Ivey, F. J. 1984. Methionine source comparison by design. Part II: The methionine controversy. Anim. Nutr. Health March/April.
10. Jansman, A. J. M., J. de Jong, and G. M Beelen. 1999. Biological effectiveness of different methionine sources in broilers. Report number 98-31126. TNO Nutr. Food Res. Inst. (ILOB), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
11. Jansman, A. J. M., C. A. Kan, and J. Wiebenga. 2003. Comparison of the biological efficacy of DL-methionine and hydroxyl-4-methylthiobutanoic acid (HMB) in pigs and poultry. Report number 2209. ID-Lelystad, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
12. Katz, R. S., and D. H. Baker. 1975a. Factors associated with utilization of the calcium salt of methionine hydroxyl analogue by the young chick. Poult. Sci. 54:584-590.
13. Katz, R. S., and D. H. Baker. 1975b. Methionine toxicity in the chick: Nutritional and metabolic implications. J. Nutr. 105:1168-1175.
14. Lemme, A., D. Hoehler, J. J. Brennan, and R. F. Mannion. 2002. Relative effectiveness of methionine hydroxyl analog compared to DL-methionine in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 81:838-845.
15. Littell, R. A., P. R. Henry, A. J. Lewis, and C. B. Ammerman. 1997. Estimation of relative bioavailability of nutrients using SAS procedures. J. Anim. Sci. 75:2672-2683.
16. Lobley, G. E., T. J. Wester, A. G. Calder, D. S. Parker, J. J. Dibner, and M. Vázquez-Añón. 2006. Absorption of 2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutyrate (HMTBA) and conversion to Met in lambs. J. Dairy Sci. 89:1072-1080.
17. Noll, S. L., P. E. Waibel, R. D. Cook, and J. A. Witmer. 1984. Biopotency of methionine sources for young turkeys. Poult. Sci. 63:2458-2470.
18. Potter, L. M., G. P. Schmidt, M. E. Blair, J. R. Shelton, and B. A. Bliss. 1984. MHAC versus DL-methionine. Part I: The methionine controversy. Anim. Nutr. Health March/April.
19. SAS Institute. 2003. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 9.0. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
20. Schutte, J. B., and J. de Jong. 1996. Biological efficacy of DL-methionine hydroxy analog free acid compared to DL-methionine in broiler chicks as determined by performance and breast meat yield. Agribiol. Res. 49:74-82.
21. Smith, R. E. 1966. The utilization of L-methionine, DL-methionine and methionine hydroxy analogue by the growing chick. Poult. Sci. 45:571-577.
22. Summers, J. D., S. Blackman, and S. Lesson. 1987. Assay estimating the potency of various methionine-active sources. Poult. Sci. 66:1779-1787.
23. Sy, B. K., and A. K. Gupta. 2004. Information-statistical data mining: Warehouse integration with examples of oracle basics. Page 80 in Akaike and Schwarz Information Criteria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
24. Thomas, O. P., E. H. Bossard, S. D. Crissey, and K. P. Engler. 1984. Further studies on the evaluation of DL-methionine and related compounds. Page 41-45 in Proc. Maryland Nutr. Conf. Feed Manuf., Baltimore, MD.
25. Thomas, O. P., C. Tamplin, S. D. Crissey, E. Bossard, and A. Zuckerman. 1991. An evaluation of methionine hydroxyl analog free acid using a nonlinear (exponential) bioassay. Poult. Sci. 70:605-610.
26. Uzu, G. 1986. Nutritional efficacy of DL-methionine and DL-methionine hydroxy analogue acid in corn soybean meal lupin diet. Pages 612-613 in Proc. Eur. Poult. Conf., Commentry, France.
27. VanWeerden, E. J., J. B. Schutte, and H. L. Bertram. 1992. Utilization of polymers of methionine hydroxyl analogue free acid (MHA-FA) in broiler chicks. Arch. Geflugelkd. 56:63-68.
28. Vázquez-Añón, M., M. Mehmeyer, C. W. Wuelling, T. Hampton, C. D. Knight, and J. J. Dibner. 2003. Differential response to 2-hydroxy-4-methylthio-butanoic acid and DL-methionine above requirement on broilers and pig performance and iron metabolism. Pages 725-729 in Progress in Research on Energy and Protein Metabolism. EAAP publication no. 109. Rostock-Warnemunde, Germany.
29. Vázquez-Añón, M., D. Kratzer, R. Gonzalez-Esquerra, G. F. Yi, and C. D. Knight. 2004. A comprehensive summary of experiments to define factors that may affect the gain response to 2-hydroxy-4 methylthio butanoic acid (HMTBA) and DL-methionine (DLM) in broilers. Poult. Sci. 83(Suppl. 1):432. (Abstr.)
30. Wester, T. J., M. Vázquez-Añón, J. Dibner, D. S. Parker, A. G. Calder, and G. E. Lobley. 2006. Hepatic metabolism of 2-hydroxy-4-thiomethylbutyrate (HMTBA) in growing lambs. J. Dairy Sci. 89:1062-1071.