Shear bond strength of metal brackets on enamel

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 76, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 851-856

  Cozza, Paola ^a,c   Martucci, Leonardo ^a   De Toffol, Laura ^a   Pencoc, Santiago Isaza ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^c NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adhesion; ARI index; Bracket; Shear bond strength

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748548985     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;34:849-853.
2. Newmann GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod. 1965;51:901-912.
3. Mitchell DL. Bandless orthodontic bracket. J Am Dent Assoc. 1967;74:103-110.
4. Wang WN, Li CH, Chou TH, Wang DDH, Lin LH, Lin CT. Bond strength of various bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125:65-70.
5. Bishara SE, Oonsombat C, Ajlouni R, Denehy G. The effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets when using a self-etch primer. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:554-557.
6. Lopez JI. Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:669-678.
7. Reynolds IR, von Fraunhofer JA. Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth: the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauge mesh size. Br J Orthod. 1976;3:91-95.
8. Fernandez L, Canut JA. In vitro comparison of the retention capacity of new aesthetic brackets. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21:71-77.
9. Maijer R, Smith DC. Variables influencing the bond strength of metal orthodontic bracket bases. Am J Orthodontics. 1981;79:20-34.
10. Willems G, Carels CEL, Verbeke G. In vitro peel/shear bond strength evaluation of orthodontic bracket base design. J Dent. 1997;25:271-278.
11. MacColl GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC, Yamin C. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:276-281.
12. Nakamichi I, Iwaken M, Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res. 1983;62:1076-1081.
13. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-340.
14. Buzzita VAJ, Hallgren SE, Powers JM. Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-bracket systems as studied in vitro. Am J Orthod. 1982;81:87-92.
15. Sharma-Sayal SK, Rossouw PE, Kulkami GV, Titley KC. The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:74-82.
16. James JW, Miller BH, English JD, Tadlock LP, Buschang PH. Effects of high-speed curing devices on shear bond strength and microleakage of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:555-561.
17. Lalani N, Foley TF, Voth R, Banting D, Marnandras A. Polymerization with the argon laser: curing time and shear bond strength. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:128-133.