Influence of visual motion on tactile motion perception

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1625-1637

  Bensmaia S J ^a,b   Killebrew, J H ^b   Craig, J C ^c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; OSCILLATION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; TACTILE STIMULATION; TOUCH; VELOCITY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; TOUCH;

EID: 33748548680     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00192.2006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Blake R, Sobel KV, and James TW. Neural synergy between kinetic vision and touch. Psychol Sci 15: 397-402, 2004.
2. Calvert GA, Spence C, and Stein BE.The Handbook of Multisensory Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.
3. Carpenter R.Movements of the Eyes. London: Pion, 1988.
4. Collins JG and Roppolo JR. A comparison of human tactile stimulus velocity discrimination with the ability of S-I cortical neurons in awake rhesus monkeys to signal the same velocity differences before and after nonanesthetic doses of pentobarbital. Brain Res 198: 307-321, 1980.
5. Craig JC. The effect of hand position and pattern motion on temporal order judgments. Percept Psychophys 65: 779-788, 2003.
6. Craig JC. Visual motion interferes with tactile motion perception. Perception 35: 351-367, 2006.
7. De Gelder B and Bertelson P. Multisensory integration, perception and ecological validity. Trends Cogn Sci 7: 460-467, 2003.
8. Diener HC, Wist ER, Dichgans J, and Brandt T. The spatial frequency effect on perceived velocity. Vision Res 16: 169-176, 1976.
9. Duhamel JR, Colby CL, and Goldberg ME. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. J Neurophysiol 79: 126-136, 1998.
10. Essick GK, Franzén O, and Whitsel BL. Discrimination and scaling of velocity of stimulus motion across the skin. Somatosens Mot Res 6: 21-40, 1988.
11. Gallace A and Spence C. Visual capture of apparent limb position influences tactile temporal order judgments. Neurosci Lett 379: 63-68, 2005.
12. Gitelman DR. ILAB: a program for postesperimental eye movement analysis. Behav Res Meth Instrum Comput 34: 605-612, 2002.
13. Gray R and Tan HZ. Dynamic and predictive links between touch and vision. Exp Brain Res 145: 50-55, 2002.
14. Hagen MC, Franzen O, McGlone F, Essick G, Dancer C, and Pardo JV. Tactile motion activates the human middle temporal/V5 (MT/V5) complex. Eur J Neurosci 16: 957-964, 2002.
15. Johnson KO. The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11: 455-461, 2001.
16. Kennett S, Spence C, and Driver J. Visuo-tactile links in covert exogenous spatial attention remap across changes in unseen hand posture. Percept Psychophys 64: 1083-1094, 2002.
17. Maravita A, Spence C, Sergent C, and Driver J. Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates cross-modal interactions. Psychol Sci 13: 350-355, 2002.
18. Moore CI, Nelson AJ, Cheney CA, Crosier WG, DaleA Merzenich, M Savoy R, and Greve D. Activity in human MT+ driven by spatially stable vibrotactile stimuli. Soc Neurosci Abstr 985.19, 2005.
19. Nelson AJ, Cheney CA, Chen I, Dai G, Grindlay G, Kempadoo K, Ramanathan A, and Moore CI. Tactile activation of putative area MT+ in the squirrel monkey revealed with 9.4 T fMRI. Soc Neurosci Abstr 985.17, 2005.
20. Pawluk DTV, van Buskirk CP, Killebrew JH, Hsiao SS, and Johnson KO. Control and pattern specification for a high density tactile display. In: Proc. of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. DSC-Vol. 64 (Furness RJ, ed), p 97-102, 1998.
21. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, and Cobb S. Touching the phanton limb. Nature 377: 489-490, 1995.
22. Roder B, Spence C, and Rosler F. Assessing the effect of posture change on tactile inhibition of return. Exp Brain Res 143: 453-462, 2002.
23. Sanabria D, Soto-Faraco S, Chan JS, and Spence C. When does visual perceptual grouping affect multisensory integration? Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4: 218:-229, 2004.
24. Shore DI, Spry E, and Spence C. Confusing the mind by crossing the hands. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 14: 153-163, 2002.
25. Smith AT and Edgar GK. The influence of spatial frequency on perceived temporal frequency and perceived speed. Vision Res 30: 1467-1474, 1990.
26. Soto-Faraco S, Spence C, and Kingstone A. Congruency effects between auditory and tactile motion: extending the phenomenon of cross-modal dynamic capture. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4: 208-217, 2004a.
27. Soto-Faraco S, Spence C, and Kingstone A. Cross-modal dynamic capture: congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30: 330-345, 2004b.
28. Spence C, Pavani F, and Driver J. Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4: 148-169, 2004.
29. Strybel TZ and Vatakis A. A comparison of auditory and visual apparent motion presented individually and with crossmodal moving distractors. Perception 33: 1033-1048, 2004.
30. Yamamoto S and Kitazawa S. Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing. Nat Neurosci 4: 759-765, 2001.