Towards reduced herbicide use in forest vegetation management

Southern African Forestry Journal

Volumn 207, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 63-79

  Little, K M ^a   Willoughby, I ^b   Wagner, R G ^c   Adams, P ^d   Frochot, H ^e   Gava, J ^f   Gous, S ^g   Lautenschlager, R A ^h   orlander G ⁱ   Sankaran, K V ^j   Wei, R P ^k  

^a INSTITUTE FOR COMMERCIAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (South Africa)

^b FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^d FORESTRY TASMANIA   (Australia)

^e LERFoB   (France)

^f NSK Brasil Ltd   (Brazil)

^g Forest Health and Protection   (Germany)

^h Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre   (Canada)

ⁱ LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^j KERALA FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^k Sino Forest Corporation   (Hong Kong)

more..

Author keywords

Certification; Herbicide alternatives; Integrated forest vegetation management; Weed control

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748546964     PISSN: 10295925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2989/10295920609505254     Document Type: Review

References (114)

1. ABARE (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics), 2004. Australian forest and wood products statistics. Canberra ACT, Australia, Internet: http://www.abareonlineshop.com (consulted: May 2004)
2. ADAMS, P.R., 2004. Competition for soil water and nitrogen between Holcus lanatus L. and young Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 304 pp
3. BAI, J., 1993. Technology for cultivating fast-growing and high-yield eucalyptus plantations. China Science and Technology Press, Beijing, 65 pp
4. BARBORA, A.C., 2001. Weed control in tea plantations: Current scenario in north-east India. In Proceedings: Alien weeds in moist tropical zones: banes and benefits. K.V. SANKARAN, S.T. MuRpHY and H.C. EVANS (eds). Kerala Forest Research Institute, 2-4 November 1999. Kerala Forest Research Institute and CABI Bioscience, UK, pp. 107-111
5. BARTHOD, C., 1994. Produits agropharmaceutiques en foret-22 questions, 22 reponses. Paris, DERF, IDF, ONF, 72 pp
6. BARTHOD, C. and LANDMANN, G., 2002. Pourquoi gerer la vegetation forestiere? Revue Forestiere Frangaise, 54(6): 617-631
7. BELLINDER, R.R., GUMMESSON, G. and KARLSSON, C., 1994. Percentage-driven government mandates for pesticide reduction: the Swedish Model. Weed Technology, 8: 350-359
8. BESSIERE, F., MOREL, M. and JEAN, R., 2002. Structure de la propriete forestiere 1999. Paris, Centre de documentation et d'information Agreste, No.144, 94 pp
9. BOARDMAN, R., 1988. Living on the edge-the development of silviculture in South Australian pine plantations. Australian Forestry, 51: 135-156
10. BOOMSMA, D.B., 1982. Herbicide useage in the establishment of coniferous plantations in Australia and New Zealand. In Proceedings: Establishment of coniferous plantations. K.R. SHEPHERD and R.O. SQUIRE (eds). Mt Gambier, South Australia, pp. 59-73
11. BOOMSMA, D.B. and HUNTER, I.R., 1990. Effects of water, nutrients and their interactions on tree growth, and plantation forest management practices in Australiasia: A review. Forest Ecology and Management, 30: 455-476
12. BROWN, C. and DURST, P.B., 2003. State of Forestry in the Asia and the Pacific-2003. Status, changes and trends. RAP Publication 2003/22. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, 67 pp
13. BURNSIDE, O.C., 1993. Weed science-The step child. Weed Technology, 7: 515-518
14. CANADIAN COUNCIL OF FOREST MINISTERS, 2002. Application of Forest Herbicides by Product and Province/Territory, 1988-2002. National Forestry Database Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Internet: http://www.ccfm.org (consulted: September 2004)
15. CARSON, R., 1962. Silent spring. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA, 368 pp
16. CHAPMAN, H.H., 1931. Forest Management. Lyon Company, New York, pp. 75-80
17. CAZETTES, A., JEAN, R. and MOREL, M., 2002. Statistiques forestieres en 2001. Paris, Centre de documentation et d'information Agreste, No.147, 85 pp
18. CHOUDHURY, A.K., 1972. Controversial Mikania (climber)-a threat to forest and agriculture. Indian Forester, 99: 43-48
19. COLINOT, A., 2003. Des indicateurs stables pour une gestion durable. Foret-entreprise, 150: 17-44
20. COLLET, C., FROCHOT, H. and GUEHL, J.M., 1996. Growth dynamics and water uptake of two forest grasses in their growth strategy and potentially competing with forest seedlings. Canadian Journal of Botany, 4: 1555-1561
21. COMEAU, P.G. and SPITTLEHOUSE, D.L., 1993. Micro-environmental changes following forest vegetation management. In Proceedings: Forest vegetation Management without Herbicides. T.B. HARRINGTON and L.A. PARENDES (eds). Oregon State University, Corvallis, February 18-19, 1992, pp. 4-9
22. COMEAU, P.G., HARPER, G.J., BLACHE, M.E., BOATENG, J.O. and GILKESON, L.A., 1996. Integrated Forest Vegetation Management: Options and Applications. In Proceedings of the fifth B.C. Forest Vegetation Management Workshop, November 29 and 30, 1993, Richmond, B.C., FRDA Report No. 251, Canadian Forest Service and B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, B.C
23. COUSENS, R., 1996. Design and interpretation of interference studies: Are some methods totally unacceptable? NewZealand Journal of Forestry Science, 26: 5-18
24. CSFA (China State Forestry Administration), 2003. Report on Forestry Development in China. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing, 124 pp
25. ECGPH (The Editing Committee of The Guangdong Province History), 1998. The Annals of Guangdong Province-Forestry. GuangDong People's Publishing House, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 124 pp
26. ELMORE, C.L., 1992. Weed science extension in transition. Weed Technology, 6: 171-176
27. EVANS, H.C., 2001. Classical biological control: A tailor made strategy for the management of alien weeds. In Proceedings: Alien weeds in moist tropical zones: banes and benefits. K.V. SANKARAN, S.T. MURPHY and H.C. EVANS (eds). Kerala Forest Research Institute, 2-4 November 1999. Kerala Forest Research Institute and CABI Bioscience, UK, pp. 35-41
28. EVELYN, J., 1670. Sylva, or a discourse of forest trees, and the propagation of timber in His Majesties Dominions. Second edition
29. FENG, S., 2001. A preliminary report on the weeding experiment of glyphosate weed killers on young forest lands. Journal of Fujian, Forestry Science and Technology, 28: 28-30
30. FORESTRY COMMISSION, 2003. Forestry facts and figures. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh
31. FORESTRY ECONOMIC SERVICES, 2002. Report on commercial timber resources and primary roundwood processing in South Africa. Directorate Forestry Technical and Information Services, Pretoria, South Africa
32. FRANKLIN, R.E., QUISENBERRY, V.L., GOSSETT, B.J. and MURDOCK, E.C., 1994. Selection of herbicide alternatives based on probable leaching to groundwater. Weed Technology, 8: 6-16
33. FROCHOT, H., ARMAND, G., GAMA, A., NOUVEAU, M. and WEHRLEN, L., 2002a. La gestion de la vegetation accompagnatrice: etat et perspective. Revue Forestiere Frangaise, 54(6): 505-520
34. FROCHOT, H., BALANDIER, P., REINECKE, H., BOULETGERCOURT, B., NINGRE, F., LEFEVRE, Y., LANDRE, F. and KOERNER, W., 2002b. Using cover plants mixtures to favour tree establishment in afforestation: an alternative to repeated herbicides or mechanical vegetation controls? In Proceedings: Fourth International Conference on Forest Vegetation Management, H. FROCHOT, C. COLLET and P. BALANDIER (eds). INRA, Nancy, 17-21 June 2002, pp. 233-235
35. FSC (Forest Stewardship Council), 2002. Chemical Pesticides in Certified Forests: Interpretation of the FSC Principles and Criteria. FSC International Policy, FSC-IP-0001, Revised and Approved July 2002. Forest Stewardship Council, International Center. Forest Stewardship Council, Oaxaca, Mexico. Internet: http://www.fscoax.org (consulted: May 2004)
36. FSC (Forest Stewardship Council), 2004. Forests certified by FSC-accredited certification bodies. Forest Stewardship Council, International Center. Bonn, Germany. Internet: http://www.fscoax.org (consulted: May 2004)
37. GAMA, A., 2002. Herbicides et debroussaillants en foret. Evolutions prochaines des homologations. Foret-entreprise, 147: 51-53
38. GAMA, A., FROCHOT, H. and DELABRAZE, P., 1987. Phytocides en sylviculture. Nogent-sur-Vernisson, Cemagref, INRA, 117 pp
39. GONQALVES, J.L.M., STAPE, J.L., LACLAU, J.P., SMETHURST, P. and GAVA, J.L., 2004. Silvicultural effects on the productivity and wood quality of eucalypt plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 193(1-2): 45-61
40. GONQALVES, J.L.M., STAPE, J.L., WICHERT, M.C.P. and GAVA, J.L., 2002. Manejo de resfduos vegetais e preparo de solo. In Conservagao e cultivo de solos para plantagoes florestais. J.L.M. GONQALVES and J.L. STAPE (eds). Piracicaba, IPEF, pp. 131-204
41. HALLSBY, G. and ORLANDER, G., 2004. A comparison of mounding and inverting to establish Norway spruce on podzolic soils in Sweden. Forestry, 77: 107-117
42. HARR, J., 1992. The role of industry in the future of weed science. Weed Technology, 6: 177-181
43. HARRINGTON, T.B., 1993. Concluding Remarks. In Proceedings: Forest vegetation Management without Herbicides. T.B. HARRINGTON and L.A. PARENDES (eds). Oregon State University, Corvallis, February 18-19, 1992, pp. 128-129
44. HARRINGTON, T.B. and PARENDES, L.A., 1993. Forest vegetation Management without Herbicides. Proceedings of a workshop held at Oregon State University, Corvallis, February 18-19, 1992
45. HE, S., LIU, S. and JUN, Q., 2000. Applied technology and efficiency of herbicide use in forest tending. Forest Science and Technology, 9: 28-29
46. HSC, 1995. The safe use of pesticides for non-agricultural purposes. Approved code of practice. HSE Books, Suffolk
47. IFN (Inventaire Forestier National), 2004. Rapport d’activite 2003. Nogent-sur-Vernisson, IFN, 40 pp
48. JARVEL, L. and PALLETT, R., 2002. Weed composition in relation to site in re-established pine compartments on the Mpumalanga Escarpment, South Africa. Southern African Forestry Journal, 196: 15-20
49. LAUTENSCHLAGER, R.A., BELL, F.W., WAGNER, R.G. and REYNOLDS, P.E., 1998. The Fallingsnow Ecosystem Project: Documenting the consequences of conifer release alternatives. Journal of Forestry, 96(11): 20-27
50. LAUTENSCHLAGER, R.A. and SULLIVAN, T.S., 2002. Effects of herbicide treatments on biotic components in regenerating northern forests. The Forestry Chronicle, 78(5): 695-731
51. LAWSON, H.M., 1994. Changes in pesticide usage in the United Kingdom: Policies, results and long-term implications. Weed Technology, 8: 360-365
52. LITTLE, K.M. and DYER, C., 2002. Some issues associated with the commercial implementation of weed management recommendations. Southern African Forestry Journal, 195: 23-32
53. LITTLE, K.M. and ROLANDO, C.A., 2001. The impact of vegetation control on the establishment of pine at four sites in the summer rainfall region of South Africa. Southern African Forestry Journal, 192: 31-40
54. LITTLE, K.M. and ROLANDO, C.A., 2004. Weed-induced eucalypt growth suppression: Results from 33 trials linking the onset of tree growth suppression with management, physiographic and climatic factors. ICFR Bulletin Series, Institute for Commercial Forestry Research, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa (In review)
55. LITTLE, K.M. and SCHUMANN, A.W., 1996. A new systematic trial design for the optimisation of interspecific weed control. In Proceedings: Eleventh Australian Weeds Conference. R.C.H. Sheperd (ed). Frankston, Weed Science Society of Victoria Inc., pp. 440-444
56. LITTLE, K.M., SCHUMANN, A.W. and NOBLE, A.D., 2002. Performance of a Eucalyptus grandis x E. camaldulensis hybrid clone as influenced by a cowpea cover-crop. Forest Ecology and Management, 168: 43-52
57. LITTLE, K.M., VAN STADEN, J. and CLARKE, G.P.Y., 2003a. Eucalyptus grandis x E. camaldulensis variability and intra-genotypic competition as a function of different vegetation management treatments. New Forests, 25: 227-242
58. LITTLE, K.M., VAN STADEN, J. and CLARKE, G.P.Y., 2003b. The relationship between vegetation management and the wood and pulping properties of a Eucalyptus hybrid clone. Annals of Forest Science, 60(7): 673-680
59. LOOMIS, J.B. and RICHARDSON, R., 2001. Economic Values of the U.S. Wilderness System: Research Evidence to Date and Questions for the Future. International Journal of Wilderness, 7(1): 31-34
60. LOWERY, R.F., LAMBETH, C.C., ENDO, M. and KANE, M., 1993. Vegetation management in tropical forest plantations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23: 2006-2014
61. LU, X., CHEN, S. and LU, Q., 1999. Use of herbicides in establish-ing forest-fire break belts. Forest Science, Technology and Development, 2: 46-47
62. MASON, B., KERR, G. and SIMPSON, J., 1999. What is continuous cover forestry? Forestry Commission Information Note 29. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh
63. MCCORMACK, Jr., M.L., 1994. Reductions in herbicide use for forest vegetation management. Weed Technology, 8: 344-349
64. MURPHY, S.T., 2001. Alien weeds in moist tropical zones of India. In Proceedings: Alien weeds in moist tropical zones: banes and benefits. K.V. SANKARAN, S.T. MURPHY and H.C. EVANS (eds). Kerala Forest Research Institute, 2-4 November 1999. Kerala Forest Research Institute and CABI Bioscience, UK, pp. 20-27
65. NAIR, P.N., 1973. The effect of gramoxone application on Eupatorium odoratum. Indian Forester, 99: 43-48
66. NAMBIAR, E.K.S., 1990. Interplay between nutrients, water, root growth and productivity in young plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 30: 231-232
67. NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA, 2004. The StateofCanadas Forests 2002-2003. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Internet: http://nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (consulted: May 2004)
68. NAVAS, M.-L., 1991. Using plant population biology in weed research: a strategy to improve weed management. Weed Research, 31: 171-179
69. NEILSEN, W.A. and WILKINSON, G.R., 1990. Eucalypt sawlog plantations in Tasmania, prospects and problems. In Prospects for Australian plantations. J. DARGAVEL and N. SEMPLE (eds). Australian National University, Canberra, pp. 550-557
70. NEW ZEALAND FOREST OWNERS ASSOCIATION, 2004. Facts and Figures 2003/2004. New Zealand Forest Owners Association Inc, Wellington, 27 pp
71. NILSSON, U. and ORLANDER, G., 1999. Vegetation management on grass dominated clearcuts in southern Sweden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29: 1015-1026
72. NORMAN, P., 1997. The Montreal process criteria and indicators-A framework for monitoring the conditions of Queensland's forests. In Sustainable forest management technical report 1997/01. Assessing and monitoring condition of native forests in Quensland. P. NORMAN and C. WITTE (eds). Department of Natural Resources, Brisbane, pp. 1-11
73. OBSER, A., 1998. Criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management and related certification schemes. Interor-ganizational processes of implementation in global forestry. Paper presented to the 39th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 17-21 March, 1998. Universitat Leipzig, Germany
74. ORLANDER, G., HALLSBY, G., GEMMEL, P. and WILHELMSSON, C., 1998. Inverting site preparation increases growth of Norway spruce and Lodge pole pine seedlings. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 13: 160-168
75. ORLANDER, G. and NORDLANDER, G., 2003. Effects of field vegetation control on pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage to newly planted Norway spruce seedlings. Annals of Forest Science 60: 637-643
76. RAMAKRISHNAN, P.S., 2001. Biological invasion as a component of global change. The Indian context. In Proceedings: Alien weeds in moist tropical zones: banes and benefits. K.V. SANKARAN, S.T. MURPHY and H.C. EVANS (eds). Kerala Forest Research Institute, 2-4 November 1999. Kerala Forest Research Institute and CABI Bioscience, UK, pp. 28-34
77. RAY, J. and RICHARDSON, B., 1995. Vegetation management in radiata pine plantations. New Zealand Forest Research Institute Report, Rotorua (unpublished)
78. RICHARDSON, B., 1993. Vegetation management practices in plantation forests in Australia and New Zealand. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23: 1989-2005
79. RICHARDSON, B., VANNER, A., RAY, J., DAVENHILL, N. and COKER, G., 1996. Mechanisms of Pinus radiata growth suppression by some common forest weed species. New Zealand Journal of Forest Science, 26: 421-437
80. RICHARDSON, B., KIMBERLEY, M. and PATTISON, A., 1997a. Pinus radiata growth benefits from spot weed control in Kinleith forest. In Proceedings: Fiftieth New Zealand Plant Protection Conference, 50: 369-372
81. RICHARDSON, B., SCHOU, W., TESKE, M., RAY, J. and EAV, B., 1997b. Spraysafe manager: A decision support system for application of herbicides in forestry. In Proceedings: Fiftieth New Zealand Plant Protection Conference, 50: 539
82. SANKARAN, K.V., 1999. Eucalyptus plantations in the monsoonal tropics-Kerala, India. In Proceedings: Site management and productivity in tropical plantation forests. E.K. S. NAMBIAR, C. COSSALTER and A. TIARKS (eds). Workshop held in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, February 16-20, 1998, CIFOR, Indonesia, pp. 45-51
83. SANKARAN, K.V., MURALEEDHARAN, P.K. and ANITHA, V., 2002. Integrated management of the alien invasive weed Mikania micrantha in the Western Ghats. KFRI Research Report No. 202. Kerala Forest Research Institute, India, 51 pp
84. SFI (Sustainable Forestry Initiative), 2002. Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) Program, 2002-2004Edition. American Forest and Paper Association, Sustainable Forestry Initiative. Washington D.C., USA. Internet: http://www.afandpa.org (consulted: May 2004)
85. SFI (Sustainable Forestry Initiative), 2003. 2003 Measurable progress data. American Forest and Paper Association, Sustainable Forestry Initiative, Washington D.C., USA. Internet: http://www.afandpa.org (consulted: May 2004)
86. SHEPARD, J.P., CREIGHTON, J. and DUNZAN, H., 2004. Forestry herbicides in the United States: An overview. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 32: 1020-1027
87. SILVA, C.R., GONQALVES, J.L.M., FOLEGATTI, B.S., STAPE, J.L. and GAVA, J.L., 1997. Weed proliferation in eucalypt stands established under minimum and intensive site preparation. In Proceedings: Silvicultura e melhoramento de eucaliptos. IUFRO conference on silviculture and improvement of eucalypts, Salvador, Brazil, 24-29 August 1997, pp. 234-241
88. SINGH, S.P., 2001. Biological control of invasive weeds in India. In Proceedings: Alien weeds in moist tropical zones: banes and benefits. K.V. Sankaran, S.T. Murphy and H.C. Evans (eds). Kerala Forest Research Institute, 2-4 November 1999. Kerala Forest Research Institute and CABI Bioscience, UK, pp. 11-19
89. SMITH, W.B., VISSAGE, J.S., DARR, D.R. and SHEFFIELD, R.M., 2001. Forest Resources of the United States, 1997. United States Forest Service, General Technical Report NC-219. Washington D.C., USA. Internet: http://fia.fs.fed.us (consulted: May 2004)
90. SWEDISH NATIONAL BOARD OF FORESTRY, 2003. 2003 Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. The National Board of Forestry, Jonkoping
91. THOMPSON, D.G. and PITT, D.G., 2003. A review of Canadian forest vegetation management research and practice. Annals of Forest Science, 60: 559-572
92. THOMPSON, R., HUMPHREY, J., HARMER, R. and FERRIS, R., 2003. Restoration of native woodland on ancient woodland sites. Forest Service /Forestry Commission, Edinburgh
93. TOLEDO, R.E.B., ALVES, P.L.C.A., VALLE, C.F. and ALVARENGA, S.F., 1999. Brachiaria decumbens management and effects on the crop development of Eucalyptus grandis. Scientia Forestalis, 55: 129-141
94. UKWAS, 2000. Certification standard for the UK woodland assurance scheme. UKWAS support unit, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh
95. VON GADOW, K. and BREDENKAMP, B., 1992. Forest Management. Academica, Pretoria, pp. 1-6
96. WAGNER, R.G., 1993. Research directions to advance forest vegetation management in North America. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23: 2317-2327
97. WAGNER, R.G., 1994. Toward integrated forest vegetation management. Journal of Forestry, 92: 26-30
98. WAGNER, R.G., BUSE, L.J., LAUTENSCHLAGER, R.A., BELL, F. W., HOLLSTEDT, C., STROBL, S., MORNEAULT, A., LEWIS, W. and TER-MIKAELIAN, M.T., 1995. Vegetation Management Alternatives Program 1994-95 Annual Report. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Queen's Printer for Ontario, p. 99
99. WAGNER, R.G., BELL, F.W. and CAMPBELL, R.A., 2001. Vegetation management. In Regenerating the Canadian forest: principles and practice for Ontario. R.G. WAGNER and S.J. COLOMBO (eds). Fitzhenry and Whiteside, Markham, Ontario, Canada, pp. 431-457
100. WAGNER, R. G., FLYNN, J., GREGORY, R., and SLOVIC, P., 1998. Public perceptions of risk and acceptability of forest vegetation management alternatives in Ontario. Forestry Chronicle, 74: 720-727
101. WAGNER, R.G., LITTLE, K.M., RICHARDSON, B. and MCNABB, K., 2006. The role of vegetation management for enhancing productivity of the world's forest. Forestry, 79: 57-79
102. WAGNER, R.G., NEWTON, M., COLE, E.C., MILLER, J.H. and SHIVER, B.D., 2004. The role of herbicides for enhancing forest productivity and conserving land for biodiversity in North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 32(4): 1028-1041
103. WALSTAD, J.D. and DOST, F.N., 1986. All the king' horses and all the king's men: the lessons of 2, 4, 5-T. Journal of Forestry, 84(9): 28-33
104. WALSTAD, J.D. and KUCH, P.J., 1987. Vegetation management for conifer production. John Wiley, New York, USA
105. WANG, Y., GAO, Z., BO, M., HE, Y. and GAO, L., 2001. Recent developments in chemical weed killer and its application in forestry in China. Journal of Zhejiang Forest Science and Technology, 21: 60-63
106. WEHRLEN, L., BROCHERAY, M., FROCHOT, H., DEMOLIS, C., and GAMA, A., 1994. Les herbicides en foret, valise pedagogique. Jeu de 59 transparents et guide a l'usage des formateurs. ONF, CNFF, Cemagref, INRA, 70 pp
107. WEI, R.-P., 2003. Merging ecological/environmental concerns into sustainable management of short rotation plantations in South China: practices by Sino-Forest Corp. In Proceedings: Eucalypt Plantations-Research, Management and Development. R-P. WEI and D-P. XU (eds). Guangzhou/Zhaoqing, 1-6 September 2002, World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 51-63
108. WHITEHEAD, R., 2004. The UK pesticide guide 2004. British Crop Protection Council /CABI publishing, Wallingford, Oxon
109. WILLOUGHBY, I., 1999. Future alternatives to the use of herbicides in British forestry. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29(7): 866-874
110. WILLOUGHBY, I., EVANS, H., GIBBS, J., PEPPER, H., GREGORY, S., DEWAR, J., NISBET, T., PRATT, J., MCKAY, H., SIDDONS, R., MAYLE, B., HERITAGE, S., FERRIS, R. and TROUT, R., 2004. Reducing pesticide use in forestry. Forestry Commission Practice Guide. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, 140 pp
111. WINCELIUS, F., 2002. Le phenomene meteorologique et son impact. Revue Forestiere Francaise sp. 2002 Apres les tempetes, 21-30
112. WYSE, D.L., 1992. Future of weed science research. Weed Technology, 6: 162-165
113. XU, X., JIN, X., HUANG, Y. and XU, G., 2003. A preliminary report on use of glyphosates in tree planting and young stand tending. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science and Technology, 30: 31-32
114. ZHANG, Q., 2003. Research on using herbicide for setting up forest-fire breaks in Yihou Mountain forest area. Forest Resource Management, 3: 40-43