Opercular beat rate for rainbow darters Etheostoma caeruleum exposed to chemical stimuli from conspecific and heterospecific fishes

Journal of Fish Biology

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 224-232

  Gibson, A K ^a,b   Mathis, A ^a  

^a MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemical cues; Etheostoma caeruleum; Opercular beat rate; Rainbow darters

Indexed keywords

ALARM SIGNAL; BIOASSAY; CHEMICAL CUE; CONSPECIFIC; FISH; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE;

ETHEOSTOMA CAERULEUM; PISCES;

EID: 33748538711     PISSN: 00221112     EISSN: 10958649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01102.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Chivers, D. P. & Smith, R. J. F. (1998). Chemical alarm signaling in aquatic predator prey systems: a review and prospectus. Écoscience 5, 338-352.
2. Commens, A. M. (2000). Response to three species of darters of the genus Etheostoma to chemical alarm cues from conspecifics and congeners. MS Thesis, Southwest Missouri State University.
3. Commens, A. M. & Mathis, A. (1999). Alarm pheromones of rainbow darters: responses to skin extracts of conspecifics and congeners. Journal of Fish Biology 55, 1359-1362. doi: 10-1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb02081.x
4. Dalla Valle, A. Z., Rivas-Diaz, R. & Claireaux, G. (2003). Opercular differential pressure as a predictor of metabolic oxygen demand in the starry flounder. Journal of Fish Biology 63, 1578-1588. doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003. 00268.x
5. Gelowitz, C. M., Mathis, A. & Smith, R. J. F. (1993). Chemosensory recognition of northern Pike, Esox lucius, by brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans: population differences and the influence of predator diet. Behaviour 127, 105-118.
6. Gibson, A. (2004). Experiences with chemical cues influences subsequent behaviour of rainbow darters, Etheostoma caeruleum. MS Thesis, Southwest Missouri State University.
7. Gray, E. V. S. & Stauffer, J. R. Jr (2001). Substrate choice by three species of darters (Teleostei: Percidae) in an artificial stream: effects of a nonnative species. Copeia 2001, 254-261.
8. Haney, D., Vokoun, J. & Nolte, D. (2001). Alarm pheromone recognition in a Missouri assemblage. Journal of Fish Biology 59, 810-817. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb00151.x
9. Hugie, D. M., Thuringer, P. L. & Smith, R. J. F. (1991). The response of the tidepool sculpin, Oligocottus maculosus, to chemical stimuli from injured conspecifics, alarm signaling in the Cottidae (Pisces). Ethology 89, 322-324.
10. James, R., Sampath, K. & Edward, D. S. (2003). Copper toxicity on growth and reproductive potential in an ornamental fish, Xiphophorus helleri. Asian Fisheries Society 16, 317-326.
11. Jansen, G. A. & Greene, N. M. (1970). Morphine metabolism and morphine tolerance in goldfish. Anesthesiology 32, 231-235.
12. Kats, L. B. & Dill, L. M. (1998). The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Écoscience 5, 361-394.
13. Lima, S. L. (1998). Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Advances in the Study of Behavior 27, 215-290.
14. Mason, R. T., Chivers, D. P., Mathis, A. & Blaustein, A. R. (2003). Bioassay methods for amphibians and reptiles. In Methods in Chemical Ecology, Vol. 2 (Haynes, K. F. & Millar, J. G., eds), pp. 271-325. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Mathis, A. & Smith, R. J. F. (1993). Intraspecific and cross-superorder responses to alarm cues by brook stickleback. Ecology 74, 2395-2404.
16. Pflieger, W. L. (1997). The Fishes of Missouri, 2nd edn. Jefferson City, MI: Missouri Department of Conservation.
17. Pollock, M. S., Chivers, D. P., Mirza, R. S. & Wisenden, B. D. (2003). Fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, learn to recognize chemical alarm cues of introduced brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans. Environmental Biology of Fishes 66, 316-319. doi: 1023/A:1023905824660
18. Rottmann, R. W., Francis-Floyd, R. & Durborrow, R. (1992). The role of stress in fish disease. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center Publication No. 474. College Station, TX: Texas A. & M. University.
19. Smith, R. J. F. (1979). Alarm reaction of Iowa and Johnny darters (Etheostoma, Percidae, Pisces) to chemicals from injured conspecifics. Canadian Journal of Zoology 57, 1278-1282.
20. Smith, R. J. F. (1982). Reaction of Percina nigrofasciata, Ammocrypta beani, and Etheostoma swaini (Percidae, Pisces) to conspecific and intergeneric skin extracts. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60, 1067-1072.
21. Smith, R. J. F. (1992). Alarm cues in fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 2, 33-63.
22. Sneddon, L. U., Braithwaite, V. A. & Gentle, M. J. (2003). Do fishes have nociceptors? Evidence for the evolution of a vertebrate sensory system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270, 1115-1121. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2369
23. Welsh, S. A. & Perry, S. A. (1998). Influence of spatial scale on estimates of substrate use by benthic darters. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18, 954-959. doi: 10.1577/1548-8675(1998)018〈0954: IOSSOE〉2.0.CO;2
24. Wisenden, B. D. & Chivers, D. P. (2006). The role of public chemical information in antipredator behaviour. In Communication in Fishes, Vol. 1 (Kapoor, B. G., Ladich, F., Collin, S. P. & Moller, P., eds). Janpath: Oxford & IBH Publishing House Co.
25. Wisenden, B. D. & Stacey, N. E. (2004). Fish semiochemicals and the evolution of communication networks. In Animal Communication Networks (McGregor, P., ed.), pp. 540-567. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Wisenden, B. D., Chivers, D. P. & Smith, R. J. F. (1995). Early warning in the predation sequence: a disturbance pheromone in Iowa darters, Etheostoma exile. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21, 1469-1480.
27. Wisenden, B. D., Chivers, D. P. & Smith, R. J. F. (1997). Learned recognition of predation risk by Enallagma damselfly larvae (Odonata, Zygoptera) on the basis of chemical cues. Journal of Chemical Ecology 23, 137-151. doi: 10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006350.66424.3d