Lip shape and position in class II division 2 malocclusion

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 76, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 739-744

  McIntyre, Grant T ^a   Millett, Declan T ^a,b  

^a DUNDEE DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Cephalometry; Class II division 2; Lip position; Lip shape; Morphometry

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748527184     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. British Standards Institute. British Standard Incisor Classification. Glossary of Dental Terms BS 4492. London, UK: British Standard Institute; 1983.
2. Ridley DR. Some factors concerned with the reduction of excessive overbite in Angle's Class II division 2 malocclusion. Trans Br Soc Study Orthod. 1960:118-140.
3. Nicol WA. The lower lip and the upper incisor teeth in Angle's Class II division 2 malocclusion. Dent Pract. 1963;14:179-182.
4. Posen AL. The influence of maximum perioral and tongue force on the incisor teeth. Angle Orthod. 1972;42:285-309.
5. Mills JRE. The problem of overbite in Class II, division 2 malocclusion. Br J Orthod. 1973;1:34-48.
6. Fletcher GGT. The retroclined upper incisor. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:207-216.
7. Luffingham JK. The lower lip and the maxillary central incisors. Eur J Orthod. 1982;4:263-268.
8. Karlsen AT. Craniofacial characteristics in children with Angle Class II div. 2 malocclusion compared with extreme deep bite. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:123-130.
9. Lapatki BG, Mager AS, Schulte-Moenting J, Jonas IE. The importance of the level of the lip line and resting lip pressure in Class II division 2 malocclusion. J Dent Res. 2002;81:323-328.
10. Gould MS, Picton DC. A study of pressures exerted by the lips and cheeks on the teeth of subjects with Angle's Class II division 1, Class II division 2 and Class 3 malocclusions compared with those of subjects with normal occlusions. Arch Oral Biol. 1968;13:527-541.
11. Luffingham JK. Lip and cheek pressure exerted upon teeth in three adult groups with different occlusions. Arch Oral Biol. 1969;14:337-350.
12. Moyers RE, Bookstein FL. The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod. 1979;75:599-617.
13. Bookstein FL. On the cephalometrics of skeletal changes. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:177-198.
14. McIntyre GT, Mossey PA. Size and shape measurement in contemporary cephalometrics. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:231-242.
15. McIntyre GT, Millett DT. Crown-root shape of the maxillary central incisor. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:710-715.
16. Stirrups DR. Guidance on presentation of cephalometry-based research studies. A personal perspective. Br J Orthod. 1993;20:359-365.
17. Houston WJB. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:382-390.
18. Chen SY, Lestrel PE, Kerr WJ, McColl JH. Describing shape changes in the human mandible using elliptical Fourier functions. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:205-216.
19. Lux CJ, Rubel J, Starke J, Conradt C, Stellzig PA, Komposch PG. Effects of early activator treatment in patients with class II malocclusion evaluated by thin-plate spline analysis. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:120-126.
20. Hajeer MY, Ayoub AF, Millett DT. Three-dimensional assessment of facial soft-tissue asymmetry before and after orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;42:396-404.
21. Schweitzer M, Pancherz H. The incisor-lip relationship in Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II, division 2 malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:358-363.
22. Harradine NW, Kirschen RH. Lip and mentalis activity and its influence on incisor position - a quantitative electromyographic study. Br J Orthod. 1983;10:114-127.
23. Johnston DJ, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Bock M. Are facial expressions reproducible? Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003;40:291-296.
24. Holtta P, Nystrom M, Evalahti M, Alaluusua S. Root-crown ratios of permanent teeth in a healthy Finnish population assessed from panoramic radiographs. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:491-497.
25. Parkin SF. Notes on Paediatric Dentistry. Oxford, UK: Wright; 1991:201.
26. Bryant RM, Sadowsky PL, Hazelrig JB. Variability in three morphologic features of the permanent maxillary central incisor. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:25-32.
27. Nicol WA. The lower lip and the upper incisor teeth in Angle's Class II division 2 malocclusion. Trans Br Soc Orthod. 1963:81-84.
28. Robertson NRE, Hilton R. Feature of the upper central incisors in Class II, division 2. Angle Orthod. 1965;35:51-53.
29. Delivanis HP, Kuftinec MM. Variation in morphology of the maxillary central incisors found in Class II, division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod. 1980;78:438-443.
30. Williams A, Woodhouse C. The crown to root angle of maxillary central incisors in different incisal classes. Br J Orthod. 1983;10:159-161.
31. Harris EF, Hassankiadeh S, Harris JT. Maxillary incisor crown root relationships in different angle malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:48-53.
32. Korda RA, Nikolidakis DK, Xagoraris MD, Athanasiou AE, Papadopoulos MA. Crown/root relations and root morphological characteristics of permanent maxillary central incisors in Class II, division 1 and 2 malocclusions. Hell Orthod Rev. 2000;3:89-96.
33. Doll GM, Zentner A, Klages U, Sergl HG. Relationship between patient discomfort, appliance acceptance and compliance in orthodontic therapy. J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61:398-413.
34. Selwyn-Barnett BJ. Rationale of treatment for Class II division 2 malocclusion. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:173-181.
35. Selwyn-Barnett BJ. Class II/division 2 malocclusion: a method of planning and treatment. Br J Orthod. 1996;23:29-36.