Patterns and mechanisms of genome organization in the mouse

Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Comparative Experimental Biology

Volumn 305, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 683-688

  Graber, Joel H ^a   Churchill, Gary A ^a   Dipetrillo, Keith J ^a   King, Benjamin L ^a   Petkov, Petko M ^a   Paigen, Ken ^a  

^a JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE ORDER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE ORDER; GENOME; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MICE; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; SELECTION (GENETICS);

MAMMALIA;

EID: 33748508230     PISSN: 15488969     EISSN: 1552499X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jez.a.322     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Alon U. 2003. Biological networks: the tinkerer as an engineer. Science 301:1866-1867.
2. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G. 2000. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25:25-29.
3. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 85:289-300.
4. Bourque G, Pevzner PA, Tesler G. 2004. Reconstructing the genomic architecture of ancestral mammals: lessons from human, mouse, and rat genomes. Genome Res 14:507-516.
5. Bourque G, Zdobnov EM, Bork P, Pevzner PA, Tesler G. 2005. Comparative architectures of mammalian and chicken genomes reveal highly variable rates of genomic rearrangements across different lineages. Genome Res 15:98-110.
6. Bray D. 2003. Molecular networks: the top-down view. Science 301:1864-1865.
7. Dawson E, Abecasis GR, Bumpstead S, Chen Y, Hunt S, Beare DM, Pabial J, Dibling T, Tinsley E, Kirby S, Carter D, Papaspyridonos M, Livingstone S, Ganske R, Lohmussaar E, Zernant J, Tonisson N, Remm M, Magi R, Puurand T, Vilo J, Kurg A, Rice K, Deloukas P, Mott R, Metspalu A, Bentley DR, Cardon LR, Dunham I. 2002. A first-generation linkage disequilibrium map of human chromosome 22. Nature 418:544-548.
8. Devlin B, Risch N. 1995. A comparison of linkage disequilibrium measures for fine-scale mapping. Genomics 29:311-322.
9. Fisher RA. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
10. Gabriel SB, Schaffner SF, Nguyen H, Moore JM, Roy J, Blumenstiel B, Higgins J, DeFelice M, Lochner A, Faggart M, Liu-Cordero SN, Rotimi C, Adeyemo A, Cooper R, Ward R, Lander ES, Daly MJ, Altshuler D. 2002. The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 296:2225-2229.
11. Hedrick PW. 1987. Gametic disequilibrium measures: proceed with caution. Genetics 117:331-341.
12. Hinds DA, Stuve LL, Nilsen GB, Halperin E, Eskin E, Ballinger DG, Frazer KA, Cox DR. 2005. Whole-genome patterns of common DNA variation in three human populations. Science 307:1072-1079.
13. Hurst LD, Pal C, Lercher MJ. 2004. The evolutionary dynamics of eukaryotic gene order. Nat Rev Genet 5:299-310.
14. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. 2001. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411:41-42.
15. Lewontin RC. 1964. The interaction of selection and linkage. II. Optimum models. Genetics 50:757-782.
16. Lewontin RC. 1988. On measures of gametic disequilibrium. Genetics 120:849-852.
17. Lewontin RC. 1995. The detection of linkage disequilibrium in molecular sequence data. Genetics 140:377-388.
18. McVean GA, Myers SR, Hunt S, Deloukas P, Bentley DR, Donnelly P. 2004. The fine-scale structure of recombination rate variation in the human genome. Science 304:581-584.
19. Nei M. 1967. Modification of linkage intensity by natural selection. Genetics 57:625-641.
20. Nei M. 2003. Genome evolution: let's stick together. Heredity 90:411-412.
21. Petkov PM, Ding Y, Cassell MA, Zhang W, Wagner G, Sargent EE, Asquith S, Crew V, Johnson KA, Robinson P, Scott VE, Wiles MV. 2004. An efficient SNP system for mouse genome scanning and elucidating strain relationships. Genome Res 14:1806-1811.
22. Petkov PM, Graber JH, Churchill GA, Dipetrillo K, King BL, Paigen K. 2005. Evidence of a large-scale functional organization of mammalian chromosomes. PLoS Genet 1:e33.
23. Phillips MS, Lawrence R, Sachidanandam R, Morris AP, Balding DJ, Donaldson MA, Studebaker JF, Ankener WM, Alfisi SV, Kuo FS, Camisa AL, Pazorov V, Scott KE, Carey BJ, Faith J, Katari G, Bhatti HA, Cyr JM, Derohannessian V, Elosua C, Forman AM, Grecco NM, Hock CR, Kuebler JM, Lathrop JA, Mockler MA, Nachtman EP, Restine SL, Varde SA, Hozza MJ, Gelfand CA, Broxholme J, Abecasis GR, Boyce-Jacino MT, Cardon LR. 2003. Chromosome-wide distribution of haplotype blocks and the role of recombination hot spots. Nat Genet 33:382-387.
24. Wagner A. 2001. The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. Mol Biol Evol 18:1283-1292.
25. Wang N, Akey JM, Zhang K, Chakraborty R, Jin L. 2002. Distribution of recombination crossovers and the origin of haplotype blocks: the interplay of population history, recombination, and mutation. Am J Hum Genet 71:1227-1234.
26. Yalcin B, Fullerton J, Miller S, Keays DA, Brady S, Bhomra A, Jefferson A, Volpi E, Copley RR, Flint J, Mott R. 2004. Unexpected complexity in the haplotypes of commonly used inbred strains of laboratory mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9734-9739.