Emerging metagovernance as an institutional framework for public private partnership networks in Denmark

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 548-556

  Koch, Christian ^a   Buser, Martine ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Denmark; Metagovernance; Public management; Public private partnerships

Indexed keywords

EMPLOYMENT; INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

DENMARK; METAGOVERNANCE; PUBLIC MAANGEMENT; PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS; PUBLIC SERVICES;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC SERVICE; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP;

DENMARK; EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 33748507104     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. RICS. Quantifying quality - A report on PFI and the delivery of public services. Salford: Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS); 2005.
2. PricewaterhouseCoopers. Developing public private partnerships in New Europe programme, PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2004. Available from: www.pwc.com/neweurope.
3. Ahadzi M., and Bowles G. Public-private partnerships and contract negotiations: an empirical study. Construct Manage Econ 22 9 (2004) 967-978
4. Pietroforte R. Communication and governance in the building process. Construct Manage Econ 15 (1997) 71-82
5. Winch G. Institutional reform in British construction: Partnering and private finance. Build Res Informat 28 2 (2000) 141-155
6. EU. Green Paper on Public Private Partnerships and Community law on Public Contracts and Concessions. COM (2004) 327. Bruxelles: EU; 2004.
7. Worldbank. Build-operate-transfer contracts - a solution for bulk supply and treatment problems. Worldbank website, 2002.
8. Leiringer R. Public private partnerships - conditions for innovation and project success. In: Atkin B., Borgbrandt J., and Josephson P.E. (Eds). Construction process improvement (2003), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 154-167
9. Heywood C, et al. Strategic issues for facility provision: A reexamination of the nimby phenomenon. In: ARCOM proceedings, 2002. p. 109-18.
10. Ferlie(red) E., Ashburner L., Fitzgerald L., and Pettigrew A. The new public management in action (1996), Oxford University Press, Oxford
11. Jones L., Guthrie J., and Steane P. Learning from international public management reform (2001), JAI Elsevier Science, London
12. In: Klausen K.K., and Ståhlberg K. (Eds). New Public Management i Norden (1998), Odense Universitetsforlag, Odense
13. Rosenau P.V. Public private policy partnerships (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
14. Van Heffen O., Kickert W., and Thomassen J. Governance in modern society effects, change and formation of government institutions (2000), Kluwer, Dordrecht
15. Sehested K. Cross-sector partnerships as a new form of local governance. In: Kjaer L., Abrahamson P., and Raynard P. (Eds). Local partnerships in Europe? An action research project (2004), The Copenhagen Centre
16. Løwendahl B. Strategic management of service firms (2000), CBS Press, Copenhagen
17. McLoughlin I., Koch C., and Dickson K. What's this "Tosh"? Innovation Networks and new product development as a political process. Int J Innovat Manage 3 5 (2001) 275-298
18. Elg U., and Johansson U. Decision-making in inter-firm networks as political process. Organisat Studies 3 18 (1997) 361-384
19. Kumaraswamy M.M., and Zhang X.Q. Governmental role in BOT-led infrastructure development. Int J Project Manage 19 4 (2001) 195-205
20. Li Bing L., Akintoye A., Edwards P.J., and Hardcastle C. The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK. Int J Project Manage 23 1 (2005) 25-35
21. Williamson OE. Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives, Mimeo, 1991.
22. Hakansson H., and Johansson J. The network as a governance structure; inter-firm cooperation beyond market and hierarchies. In: Grabher G. (Ed). The embedded firm: on the socioeconomics of industrial networks (1993), Routledge, London
23. Castells M. The rise of the network society (1999), Blackwell, Cambridge, MA
24. Griffith A., and Zammuto R.F. Institutional governance systems and variations in national competitive advantage: an integrative framework. Acad Manage Rev 30 2 (2005) 823-842
25. Bougrain F, Carassus J, Colombard-Prout M. Partenariat Public Privé et Bâtiment en Europe. Quels Enseignements pour la France? Paris: Presses de L'ecoles National des Ponts & Chaussées, 2005.
26. Loosemore M., and Tan C.C. Occupational bias in construction management research. Construct Manage Econ 18 (2000) 757-766
27. Gottlieb S, Buser M, Koch C. Innovation and drift - Danish Municipalities and construction firms in networked public services. In: Paper presented at EGOS 2003 Sub theme 27 Post New Public Management Models in the Organization of Public Services?.
28. Koch C, Buser M, Thuesen C. Managing projects with the public, - bringing partnering, contracts and financing together in building public services. In: De Meyer A, et al., editors. Operation management as a change agent. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference, EUROMA, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, 2004. p. 199-208.
29. Buser M, Koch C. Developing public private partnerships in Denmark - The role of construction firms in networked public services. In: Proceedings CICT, Athens, 2005.
30. Sundbo J. The organization and strategy of innovation in service. In: Boden M., and Miles I. (Eds). Services and the knowledge-based economy (2000), Continuum, London
31. Latour B. Science in action (1988), Sage, London
32. Boltanski L, Chiapello E. Le Nouvel Esprit du Capitalisme. Gallimard, Paris, 1999.
33. OECD. New patterns of industrial globalisation: Cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Paris: OECD; 2001.
34. Andersson NA. Mesoeconomic analysis of the construction industry. Division of Construction Management, Lund University, Lund, 2003.
35. Winch G. Managing construction projects (2002), Blackwell Science, Oxford
36. Bresnen M., and Marshall N. The engineering or evolution of co-operation? A tale of two partnering projects. Int J Project Manage 20 (2002) 497-505
37. OECD. Principles of corporate governance. Paris: OECD; 1999.
38. Turnbull S. Corporate governance. Its scope, concerns and theories. Corporate Governance - An International Review 5 4 (1997)
39. Williamson O.E. Market and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications (1975), The Free Press, New York
40. In: Williamson O.E. (Ed). Organization theory (1990), Oxford University Press, New York
41. Peters B.G., and Pierre J. Governance, politics and the state (2000), Macmillan, Basingstoke
42. Koch C. Collaboration on change in construction - On why Scandinavian Union approaches are still modern. In: Dainty A., Green S., and Bagilhole B. (Eds). People and culture in construction: A reader (2006), Blackwell, London
43. Rothstein B. The Social Democratic State. The Swedish model and the Bureaucratic Problems of Social Reforms (1996), The University of Pittsburg Press, Pittsburg
44. Beck Jørgensen T., and Bozeman B. Public values lost?. Public Manage Rev 1 4 (2002) 63-81
45. EBST. Offentligt-privat samspil om skolebygninger. (EBST is the National Agency for Enterprise and Construction), 2003.
46. EBST Indsamling og analyse af udenlanske erfaringer med OPP i byomdannelse. Socialministeriet, EBST, København, 2005.
47. EBST. OPP-Markedet i Danmark 2005-2010. København: EBST, June 2005.
48. Marchington M., Grimshaw D., Rubery J., and Willmott H. Fragmenting work: Blurring organizational boundaries and disordering hierarchies (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
49. DANISKA. Vedrørende EU-kommissionens grønbog om offentlige private partnerskaber. Accessed at website, EU, 2005.
50. OBSERVER. Korruptionsundersøgelse, København, Dansk byggeri, 2005. DB (DB is Dansk Byggeri, the contracting employers association).
51. EU. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Public-Private Partnerships and Community Law on Public Procurement and Concessions. Bruxelles: EU-Commission, 2005.