Helicopter disposition with the Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System - Expectations realized?;Hubschrauberdisposition mit dem Advanced-Medical-Priority-Dispatch-System - Erwartungen erfüllt?

Notfall und Rettungsmedizin

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 437-445

  Trimmel, H ^a,b   Wodak, A ^a,b   Voelckel, W ^c  

^a Flugrettungszentrum Wiener Neustadt ^*  (Austria)

^b GENERAL HOSPITAL KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

^c INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

AMPDS; Assignment code; Computerized documentation system; Incorrect deployment; Reference diagnosis

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748503381     PISSN: 14346222     EISSN: 14360578     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10049-006-0837-8     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Biewener A, Aschenbrenner U, Rammelt S et al. (2004) Impact of helicopter transport and hospital level on mortality of polytrauma patients. J Trauma 56: 94-98
2. Black JJ, Ward ME, Lockey DJ (2004) Appropriate use of helicopters to transport trauma patients from incident scene to hospital in the United Kingdom: an algorithm. Emerg Med J 21: 355-361
3. Cummings G, O'Keefe G (2000) Scene disposition and mode of transport following rural trauma: a prospective cohort study comparing patient costs. J Emerg Med 18: 349-354
4. Deutsche Bundesärztekammer Notarztindikationskatalog (2001) www.bundesaerztekammer.de/30/Notfallmedizin/Indikationskatalog.html
5. Kennedy JD, Sweeney TA, Roberts D, O'Connor RE (2003) Effectiveness of a medical priority dispatch protocol for abdominal pain. Prehosp Emerg Care 7: 89-93
6. Maggiore WA (2004) Priority medical dispatch is the standard of care. JEMS 29: 160-161
7. Marks PJ, Daniel TD, Afolabi O et al. (2002) Emergency (999) calls to the ambulance service that do not result in the patient being transported to hospital: an epidemiological study. Emerg Med J 19: 449-452
8. Nardi G, Massarutti D, Muzzi R et al. (1994) Impact of emergency medical helicopter service on mortality for trauma in north-east Italy. Eur J Emerg Med 1: 69-77
9. Niederösterreichischer Gesundheits- und Sozialfonds. Medizinische Richtlinien. www.noegus.at/html/medrichtlinien/hauptframe.html
10. Schlechtriemen T, Burghofer K, Lackner CK, Altemeyer KH (2005 a) Validierung des NACA-Score anhand objektivierbarer Parameter. Untersuchung an 104.962 Primäreinsätzen der Jahre 1999-2003 aus der Luftrettung. Notfall & Rettungsmedizin 8: 96-108
11. Schlechtriemen T, Burghofer K, Stolpe E et al. (2005 b) Der Münchner NACA-Score. Eine Modifikation des NACA-Score für die präklinische Notfallmedizin. Notfall & Rettungsmedizin 8: 109-111
12. Shah MN, Bishop P, Lerner EB et al. (2005) Validation of using EMS dispatch codes to identify low-acuity patients. Prehosp Emerg Care 9: 24-31
13. Trimmel H (1996) NACA-X©: EDV für Notarztsysteme. Notarzt 12: 47-54
14. Tryba M, Brüggemann H, Echtermeyer V (1980) Klassifizierung von Erkrankungen und Verletzungen in Notarztsystemen. Notfallmedizin 6: 725-727
15. Weninger P, Trimmel H, Herzer G et al. (2005) Prähospitale Traumaversorgung. Luftgestützter vs. bodengebundener Notarztdienst. Notfall & Rettungsmedizin 8: 171-181
16. Wilson S, Cooke M, Morrell R et al. (2002) Emergency Medicine Research Group (EMeRG). A systematic review of the evidence supporting the use of priority dispatch of emergency ambulances. Prehosp Emerg Care 6: 42-49
17. Zachariah BS, Pepe PE, Curka PA (1995) How to monitor the effectiveness of an emergency medical dispatch system: the Houston model. Eur J Emerg Med 2: 123-127
18. Zalstein S, Cameron PA (1997) Helicopter emergency medical services: their role in integrated trauma care. Aust N Z J Surg 67: 593-598