Incidence of noncarious cervical lesions and their relation to the presence of wear facets: Commentary

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 184-

  Eakle, Stephan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748483496     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00016.x     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Rees JS, Jagger DC. Abfraction lesions: myth or reality? J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:263-71.
2. Lyons K. Aetiology of abfraction lesions. N Z Dent J 2001;97(429):93-8.
3. McCoy G. On the longevity of teeth. Oral Implantol 1983;11(2):248-67.
4. Yettram AL. Finite element stress analysis of the crowns of normal and restored teeth. J Dent Res 1976;55:1004-11.
5. Geramy A, Sharafoddin F. Abfraction: 3D analysis by means of the finite element method. Quintessence Int 2003;34(7):526-33.
6. Lee HE, Lin CL, Wang CH, et al. Stresses at the cervical lesion of maxillary premolar-finite element investigation. J Dent 2002;30(7-8):283-90.
7. Rees JS. The effect of variation in occlusal loading on the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29(2):188-93.
8. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, et al. Examining tooth flexural effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:41-7.
9. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, et al. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994;73:1690-702.
10. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Brunson WD, et al. Twelve-month clinical study of dentinal adhesives in class V cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;12:53-78.