Difficulties with the follow-up of a cohort of very preterm infants: the EPIPAGE Paris-Petite-Couronne population;Difficultés de suivi d'une cohorte d'enfants nés grands prématurés : EPIPAGE Paris-Petite-Couronne

Archives de Pediatrie

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1202-1208

  Du Mazaubrun, C ^a   Garel, M ^a   Ancel, P Y ^a   Supernant, K ^a   Blondel, B ^a  

^a INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Bias; Epidemiology; Follow up studies; Infant; Infant very low birth weight; newborn; Patient dropouts; Socioeconomic factors

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FAMILY; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERFORMANCE; PREMATURITY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; TELEPHONE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; FRANCE; NEWBORN; PARENT; PATIENT; VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT;

CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COGNITION DISORDERS; COHORT STUDIES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FRANCE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFANT, PREMATURE, DISEASES; INFANT, VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; PARENTS; PATIENT DROPOUTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 33748469919     PISSN: 0929693X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2006.05.016     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. McCormick M., Baker J., Brooks-Gunn J., et al. Cohort construction: which infants can be restudied at school age?. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 5 (1991) 410-422
2. Wolke D., Sohne B., Ohrt B., et al. Follow-up of preterm children: important to document dropouts. Lancet 345 (1995) 447
3. Campbell M.K., Halinda E., Carlyle M.J., et al. Factors predictive of follow-up clinic attendance and developmental outcome in a regional cohort of very low birth weight infants. Am. J. Epidemiol. 138 (1993) 704-713
4. Catlett A.T., Thompson Jr. R.J., Johndrow D.A., et al. Risk status for dropping out of developmental follow-up for very low birth weight infants. Public Health Rep. 108 (1993) 589-594
5. Aylward G.P., Hatcher R.P., Stripp B., et al. Who goes and who stays: subject loss in a multicenter, longitudinal follow-up study. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 6 (1985) 3-8
6. Callanan C., Doyle L.W., Rickards A.L., et al. Children followed with difficulty: how do they differ?. J. Paediatr. Child Health 37 (2001) 152-156
7. Wolke D., Ratschinski G., Ohrt B., et al. The cognitive outcome of very preterm infants may be poorer than often reported: an empirical investigation of how methodological issues make a big difference. Eur. J. Pediatr. 153 (1994) 906-915
8. Tin W., Fritz S., Wariyar U., et al. Outcome of very preterm birth: children reviewed with ease at 2 years differ from those followed up with difficulty. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 79 (1998) F83-F87
9. Larroque B., Bréart G., Kaminski M., et al., on behalf of the EPIPAGE study group. Survival of very preterm infants: Epipage, a population based cohort study. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 89 (2004) F139-F144
10. Kaufman A.S., and Kaufman N.-A. Batterie pour l'examen psychologique de l'enfant (1993), Éditions du centre de psychologie appliquée, Paris
11. Lasbeur L., Kaminski M., Du Mazaubrun C., et al. Analyse des inégalités socioéconomiques de santé à partir des données du recensement : exemple de la grande prématurité à Paris. Population (Paris) (2006) (sous presse)
12. Tyson J.E., Lasky R.E., Rosenfeld C.R., et al. An analysis of potential biases in the loss of indigent infants to follow-up. Early Hum. Dev. 16 (1988) 13-25
13. Hack M., Breslau N., Aram D., et al. The effect of very low birth weight and social risk on neurocognitive abilities at school age. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 13 (1992) 412-420
14. Wolke D., and Meyer R. Cognitive status, language attainment and prereading skills of 6 years old very preterm children and their peers: the Bavarian Longitudinal Study. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 41 (1999) 94-109
15. Resnick M.B., Stralka K., Cartyer R.L., et al. Effects of birth weight and sociodemographic variables on mental development of neonatal intensive care unit survivors. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 162 (1990) 374-378
16. Bailey Jr. D.B., Hebbeler K., Scarborough A., et al. First experiences with early intervention: a national perspective. Pediatrics 113 (2004) 887-896
17. Zupan V., and Dehan M. Réseau Pédiatrique « Béclère ». Le réseau de suivi pédiatrique du sud de l'Île-de-France. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris) 30 1 Suppl (2001) 55-66
18. Rozé J.C., N'Guyen S., Bureau-Rouger V., et al. Réseau de suivi des nouveau-nés à risque de développer un handicap : l'exemple du réseau « Grandir ensemble en Pays-de-la-Loire ». J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 33 1 Suppl (2004) S54-S60