Types of suggestibility: Relationships among compliance, indirect, and direct suggestibility

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 392-415

  Polczyk, Romuald ^a   Pasek, Tomasz ^a  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPNOSIS; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPECTROSCOPY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS; SUGGESTION;

EID: 33748468383     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: 17445183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207140600856764     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Balthazard, C. G., & Woody, E. Z. (1992). The spectral analysis of hypnotic performance with respect to "absorption." International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 40, 21-43.
2. Barabasz, A. (2000). EEG markers of alert hypnosis: The induction makes a difference. Sleep and Hypnosis, 4, 164-169.
3. Barabasz, A., Barabasz, M., Jensen, S., Calvin, S., Trevisan, M., & Warner, D. (1999). International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 5-22.
4. Barber, T. X. (1964). Hypnotizability, suggestibility, and personality. A critical review of research findings. Psychological Reports, 14, 299-320.
5. Barber, T. X. (1965). Measuring "hypnotic-like" suggestibility with and without "hypnotic induction"; Psychometric properties, norms and variables influencing response to the Barber Suggestibility Scale (BSS). Psychological Reports, 16, 809-844.
6. Barber, T. X., & Calverley, D. S. (1966). Toward a theory of hypnotic behavior: Experimental evaluation of Hull's postulate that hypnotic susceptibility is a habit phenomenon. Journal of Personality, 34, 416-433.
7. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significant tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Rulletin, 88, 588-606.
8. Benton, A. L., & Bandura, A. (1953). "Primary" and "secondary" suggestibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 336-340.
9. Braffman, W., & Kirsch, I. (1999). Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability: An empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 578-587.
10. Crawford, H. J., Brown, A. M., & Moon, C. E. (1993). Sustained attentional and disattentional abilities: Differences between low and highly hypnotizable persons. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 534-543.
11. De Pascalis, V. (1999). Psychophysiological correlates of hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 117-143.
12. Evans, F. J. (1967). Suggestibility in the normal waking state. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 114-129.
13. Evans, F. J. (1989). The independence of suggestibility, placebo response, and hypnotizability. In V. A. Gheorghiu, P. Netter, H. J. Eysenck, & R. Rosenthal (Eds.), Suggestion and suggestibility: Theory and research (pp. 145-154). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
14. Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15. Eysenck, H. J., & Furneaux, W. D. (1945). Primary and secondary suggestibility: An experimental and statistical study. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 485-503.
16. Gheorghiu, V. A. (1966). Experimental investigation on suggestibility: On the effects of direct and indirect suggestions. Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales, 10, 1-12.
17. Gheorghiu, V. A. (1971). Relations between the direct and indirect forms of the body sway test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 19, 134-139.
18. Gheorghiu, V. A. (1981). Research strategies concerning suggestibility in the motor field. Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales - Serie de Psychologie, 25, 35-45.
19. Gheorghiu, V. A. (1989). The development of research on suggestibility: Critical considerations. In V. A. Gheorghiu, P. Netter, H. J. Eysenck, & R. Rosenthal (Eds.), Suggestion and suggestibility. Theory and research (pp. 3-56). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
20. Gheorghiu, V. A., Hodapp, V., & Ludwig, C. M. (1975). Attempt to construct a scale for the measurement of the effect of suggestions on perception. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 341-352.
21. Gheorghiu, V. A., Koch, E., & Hübner, M. (1994). A group scale for the influence of suggestion on sensory judgments. Hypnos, 21, 1-12.
22. Gheorghiu, V. A., Meiu, G. H., Onofrei, A. I., & Timofte, G. (1966). Experimental investigation on suggestibility: On the effects of direct and indirect suggestions. Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales, 10, 163-174.
23. Gheorghiu, V. A., Netter, P., & Tichi, H. J. (1989). A test of sensory suggestibility. In A. F. Bennett, & K. M. McConkey (Eds.), Cognition in individual and social contexts (pp. 507-517). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
24. Gheorghiu, V. A., Polczyk. R., & Kappeler, C. (2003). The Warmth Suggestibility Scale - A procedure for measuring the influence of suggestion on warmth sensations. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 219-231.
25. Graham, C., & Evans, F. J. (1977). Hypnotizability and the development of waking attention. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 631-638.
26. Graham, K. R., & Greene, L. D. (1981). Hypnotic susceptibility related to an independent measure of compliance - Alumni annual giving. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 351-354.
27. Green, J. P., Barabasz, A. F., Barrett, D., & Montgomery, G. H. (2005). Forging ahead: The 2003 APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53 (3), 259-264.
28. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1988). The relationship of intelligence and memory to interrogative suggestibility: The importance of range effects. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 185-187.
29. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1997). The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales Manual. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
30. Gudjonsson, G. H., & Clark, N. (1986). Suggestibility in police interrogation: A social psychological model. Social Behaviour, 1, 83-104.
31. Gwynn, M. I., & Spanos, N. P. (1996). Hypnotic responsiveness, nonhypnotic suggestibility, and responsiveness to social influence. In R. G. Kunzendorf, N. P. Spanos, & B. Wallace (Eds.), Hypnosis and imagination (pp. 147-175). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
32. Hajek, P., & Kratochvil, S. (1973). Socialni ovlivnitelnost a hypnabilita [Susceptibility to social influence and hypnotizability]. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie, 17, 368-374.
33. Hajek, P., & Spacek, J. (1987). Territory, hypnotic susceptibility, and social influence: A pilot study. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 4, 115-117.
34. Hammer, A. G., Evans, F. J., & Bartlett, M. (1963). Factors in hypnosis and suggestion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 15-23.
35. Hilgard, E. R. (1965). Hypnotic susceptibility. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
36. Hilgard, E. R. (1987). Research advances in hypnosis: Issues and methods. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 35, 248-264.
37. Hilgard, E. R. (1991). A neodissociation interpretation of hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn, & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis. Current models and perspectives (pp. 84-104). New York: Guilford.
38. Hilgard, J. R. (1974). Imaginative involvement: Some characteristics of the highly hypnotizable and the nonhypnotizable. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22, 138-156.
39. Hilgard, J. R. (1979). Personality and hypnosis. A study of imaginative involvement. (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Hovland, C. I., & Janis, I. L. (1959). Personality and persuasibility. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41. Hull, C. L. (1933). Hypnosis and suggestibility. An experimental approach. New York: Appleton-Century.
42. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed). Chicago: SPSS Inc.
43. Karlin, R. A. (1979). Hypnotizability and attention. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 92-95.
44. Kihlstrom, J. E. (1985). Hypnosis. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 385-418.
45. Kirsch, I., Silva, C. E., Comey, G., & Reed, S. (1995). A spectral analysis of cognitive and personality variables in hypnosis: Empirical disconfirmation of the two-factor model of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 167-175.
46. Linton, C. P., & Sheehan, P. W. (1994). The relationship between interrogative suggestibility and susceptibility to hypnosis. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22, 53-64.
47. McGlashan, T. H., Evans, F. J., & Orne, M. T. (1969). The nature of hypnotic analgesia and placebo response to experimental pain. Psychosomatic Medicine, 31, 227-246.
48. Moore, R. K. (1964). Susceptibility to hypnosis and susceptibility to social influence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 282-294.
49. Netter, P., Gheorghiu, V. A., Kruse, P., & Hübner, M. (1989). Einflußfaktoren der Suggestibilität [Determinants of suggestibility]. Bericht Nr. 216/5-2. Gießen: Justus-Liebig Universität.
50. Orne, M. T. (1966). Hypnosis, motivation and compliance. American Journal of Psychiatry, 122, 721-726.
51. Perugini, E. M., Kirsch, I., & Allen, S. T. (1998). Surreptitious observation of responses to hypnotically suggested hallucinations: A test of the compliance hypothesis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 46, 191-203.
52. Polczyk, R. (2004). Dimensions of suggestibility: A confirmatory factor analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
53. Register, P. A., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1988). Hypnosis and interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 549-558.
54. Sarbin, T. R., & Coe, W. C. (1979). Hypnosis and psychopathology: Replacing old myths with fresh metaphors. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 506-526.
55. Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
56. Schulman, R. E., & London, E. (1963). Hypnotic susceptibility and MMPI profiles. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 27, 157-160.
57. Schultz, J. H. (1960). Das Autogene Training [Autogenic Training]. (10th ed.). Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme Verlag.
58. Shames, M. L. (1981). Hypnotic susceptibility and conformity: On the mediational mechanism of suggestibility. Psychological Reports, 49, 563-566.
59. Sheehan, P. W. (1979). Hypnosis and the process of imagination. In E. Fromm, & R. E. Shor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Developments and new perspectives. (2nd ed.). (pp. 381-411). New York: Aldine.
60. Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception [Monograph]. Archives of Psychology, 187, 1-60.
61. Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
62. Siuta, J. (1982). Badania porównawcze nad Skala Sugestywnosci Barbera [Comparative research on the Barber Suggestibility Scale]. Zeszyty Naukowe UJ, Prace Pedagogiczno-Psychologiczne, 34, 93-112.
63. Spiegel, H. (1978). Manual for the Hypnotic Induction Profile. New York: Basic.
64. Stukat, K. G. (1958). Suggestibility: A factorial and experimental analysis. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
65. Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ("absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268-277.
66. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
67. Wagstaff, G. F. (1996). Compliance and imagination in hypnosis. In R. G. Kunzendorf & N. P. Spanos, Hypnosis and imagination (pp. 19-40). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
68. Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1953). Hypnotism: An objective study in suggestibility. New York: Wiley.
69. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1959). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
70. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
71. Woody, E. Z., Drugovic, M., & Oakman, J. M. (1997). A reexamination of the role of nonhypnotic suggestibility in hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 399-407.
72. Zaragoza, M. S., & Lane, S. M. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 934-945.