Pathway design effects on synthetic vision head-up displays

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5424, Issue , 2004, Pages 61-72

  Kramer, Lynda J ^a   Prinzel III, Lawrence J ^a   Arthur III, Jarvis J ^a   Bailey, Randall E ^a  

^a NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Head up Display; Pathway; Synthetic Vision; Terrain Awareness; Tunnel

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; AIRCRAFT; AIRPORTS; FLIGHT DYNAMICS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; NAVIGATION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; TUNNELS;

HEAD-UP DISPLAYS; PATHWAY; SYNTHETIC VISION; TERRAIN AWARENESS;

VISIBILITY;

EID: 10444263800     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.543937     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Boeing (1998). Statistical summary of commercial jet aircraft accidents, Worldwide Operations, 1959-1997. Seattle, WA: Airplane Safety Engineering, Boeing Commercial Airplane Group.
2. FAA (2003). FAA Runway Safety Report - Runway Incursion Trends at Towered Airports. FAA Office of Runway Safety, July 2003.
3. Williams, D., Waller, M., Koelling, J., Burdette, D., Doyle, T., Capron, W., Barry, J., & Gifford, R. (2001). Concept of operations for commercial and business aircraft synthetic vision systems. NASA Langley Research Center: NASA Technical Memorandum TM-2001-211058.
4. RTCA (2000). Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards: Required Navigation Performance for Area Navigation (RTCA DO-236A). Washington, D.C.: RTCA, Incorporated.
5. Snow, Michael P. & French, Guy A. (2002). Effects of primary flight display symbology on workload and situation awareness in a head-up synthetic vision display. Air Force Research Laboratory, 29 August.
6. Kramer, L.J., Prinzel, L.J., Bailey, R.E., & Arthur, J.J. (2003). Synthetic vision enhances situation awareness and RNP capabilities for terrain-challenged approaches. Proceedings of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Third Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Technical Forum, AIAA 2003-6814, 1-11.
7. Glaab, L.J., Kramer, L.J., Arthur, T., & Barry, J.S. (2003). Flight test comparison of synthetic vision display concepts at Dallas/Fort Worth International airport. NASA Langley Research Center: NASA Technical Paper TP-2003-212177.
8. Arthur, J.J., Prinzel, L.J., Kramer, L.J., Bailey, R.E., & Parrish, R.V. (2003). CFIT Prevention Using Synthetic Vision. SPIE. In Proceedings of SPIE, Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2003, Editor: Jacques G. Verly, Volume 5018 paper 16 Apr.
9. Prinzel, L.J., Arthur, J.J., Kramer, L.J., & Bailey, R.E. (in press). Pathway concepts experiment for head-down synthetic vision displays. SPIE. In Proceedings of SPIE, Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2004, Editor: Jacques G. Verly, Volume 5424 paper 12 Apr.
10. Merrick, V.K. & Jeske, J.A. (1995). Flightpath synthesis and HUD scaling for V/STOL terminal area operations. NASA Langley Research Center: NASA Technical Memorandum TM-1995-110348.
11. Jones D.R., Quach, S.D., & Young, S.D. (October 14, 2001). Runway Incursion Prevention System Demonstration and testing at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. 20 Annual Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). Daytona Beach, FL.
12. Ames, Lawrence L. & George, Edward J. (1993). Revision and verification of a seven-point workload estimation scale. Air Force Flight Technical Center: AFFTC-TIM-93-01.
13. AIAA (1993). Guide to Human Performance Measurement. Washington D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
14. Vidulich, M. A. & Hughes, E.R. (1991). Testing a subjective metric of situation awareness. Proceedings of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society. 35, 1307-1311.
15. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2001). Aerospace Technology Enterprise, Washington, D.C.: NASA.