Barriers to utilization of chronic peritoneal dialysis in network #1, New England

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 452-457

  Troidle, Laura ^a,b,c,d   Kliger, Alan ^a,b,c,d   Finkelstein, Fredric ^a,b,c,d  

^a New Haven CAPD   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL OF SAINT RAPHAEL   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Renal Research Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Barriers; CPD; Incidence; Nephrologists; Prevalence; Utilization

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ARTICLE; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; COMORBIDITY; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; MAINTENANCE THERAPY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MORTALITY; NEPHROLOGIST; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SELECTION; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33748439472     PISSN: 08968608     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089686080602600409     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. United States Renal Data System. USRDS 2004 Annual Data Report. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, Departmentof Health and Human Services; 2004.
2. Blake PG, Finkelstein FO. Why is the proportion of patients doing peritoneal dialysis declining in North America? Perit Dial Int 2001; 21:107-14.
3. Kiernan L, Kliger A, Gorban-Brennan N, Juergensen P, Tesin D, Vonesh E, et al. Comparison of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-retated infections with different "Y-tubing" exchange systems. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995; 5:1835-8.
4. Juergensen PH, Murphy AL, Pherson KA, Kliger AS, Finkelstein FO. Tidal peritoneal dialysis: comparison of different tidal regimens and automated peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2000; 57:2603-7.
5. Mendelssohn DC, Mullaney SR, Jung B, Blake PG, Mehta RL. What do American nephrologists think about dialysis modality seLection? Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37:22-9.
6. Jung B, Blake PG, Mehta RL, Mendelssohn DC. Attitudes of Canadian nephrologists toward dialysis modality selection. Perit Dial Int 1999; 19:263-8.
7. Jassal SV, Krishna G, Mallick NP, Mendelsshohn DC. Attitudes of British Isles nephrologists towards modality selection: a questionnaire study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17:474-7.
8. Troidle LK, Gorban-Brennan N, Kliger AS, Finkelstein FO. Continuous cycler therapy, manual peritoneal dialysis therapy, and peritonitis. Adv Perit Dial 1998; 14:137-41.
9. Frampton JE, Plosker GL. Icodextrin: a review of its use in peritoneal dialysis. Drugs 2003; 63:2079-105.
10. Jager KJ, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, Krediet RT, Boeschoten EW; Netherlands Cooperative Study on Adequacy of Dialysis Study Group. The effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in The Netherlands. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 43:891-9.
11. Rodd K, Wuerth D, Finkelstein S, Kliger AS, Finkelstein FO. More chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients choose peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis after receiving CKD education [Abstract]. Perit Dial Int 2004; 24(Suppl 1):S26.
12. United States Renal Data System. The USRDS Morbidity and Mortality Study: Wave 2. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 32(2 Suppl 1):S67-85.
13. Coresh J, Byrd-Holt D, Astor BC, Briggs JP, Eggers PW, Lacher DA, et al. Chronic kidney disease awareness, prevalence and trends among U.S. adults, 1999 to 2000. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16:180-8.
14. TroidLe L, Gorban-Brennan N, Kliger A, Finkelstein FO. Continuous peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a review and current concepts. Semin Dial 2003; 16:428-37.
15. Kliger AS, Finkelstein FO. Payment of USA physicians for dialysis care. Perit Dial Int 2004; 24:518-20.
16. Mendelssohn DC, Langlois N, Blake PG. Peritoneal dialysis in Ontario: a natural experiment in physician reimbursement methodology. Perit Dial Int 2004; 24:531-7.
17. Blake PG. The complex economics of modality selection. Perit Dial Int 2004; 24:538-41.
18. Lee H, Manns B, Taub K, Ghali WA, Dean S, Johnson D, et al. Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40:611-22.
19. Rubin HR, Fink NE, Plantinga LC, Sadler JH, Kliger AS, Powe NR. Patient ratings of dialysis care with peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis. JAMA 2004; 291:697-703.
20. Wu AW, Fink NE, Marsh-Manzi JV, Meyer KB, Finkelstein FO, Chapman MM, et al. Changes in quality of life during hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis treatment: generic and disease specific measures. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004 15: 743-53.