Social percolation in relations between activists and supporters

Complexity

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 51-56

  Takahashi, Kazuyuki Ikku ^a   Murai, Ryousuke ^b  

^a MEIJI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b HITACHI LTD   (Japan)

Author keywords

Activists; Bond percolation; Social percolation; Supporters, threshold

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748425915     PISSN: 10762787     EISSN: 10990526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cplx.20139     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Solomon, S. et al. Social Percolation Models. arXlv:adap-org/9909001.
2. Solomon, & et al. Social percolation models. Physica A 2000, 277, 239-247.
3. Proyleova, A.; Stauffer, D. Social percolation and the influence of mass media. Physica A 2002, 312, 300-304.
4. Galam, S. The September 11 attack: A percolation of individual passive support. Eur Phys J B 2002, 26, 269-272.
5. Galam, S. Global Physics: From Perception to Terrorism, Guerilla Warfare and Clandestine Activities, arXiv:cond-mat/0404265v1, 2004.
6. Stauffer, D.; Aharony A. Introduction to Percolation Theory Taylor & Francis: 1994.
7. Luhman, N. Social Systems; Stanford University Press, 1995.
8. Albeveno, D. et al. Activists and Supporters in Bethe Lattice, Submitted.
9. Newman, M.E.J.; Park, J. Why social networks are different from other types of networks. Phys Rev E arXiv:cond-mat/0305612v1, 2003.
10. Axelrod, R. The Comptexity of Cooperation-Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration; Princeton University Press: Princeton NJ, 1997.
11. Deffuant, G. et al. How can extremetism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 2002, 5(4).
12. Deffuant, G. et al. Simple is beautiful ... and necessary. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 2003, 6(1).