Reduced complexity RBF classifiers with support vector centres and dynamic decay adjustment

Neurocomputing

Volumn 69, Issue 16-18, 2006, Pages 2446-2450

  Perfetti, Renzo ^a   Ricci, Elisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dynamic decay adjustment; Model complexity; Pruning; RBF networks; Support vector machines

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DECISION THEORY; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS;

DYNAMIC DECAY ADJUSTMENT; MODEL COMPLEXITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY CONTROL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 33748420178     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2006.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Berthold M.R., and Diamond J. Boosting the performance of RBF networks with dynamic decay adjustment. In: Tesauro G., et al. (Ed). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 7 (1995), The MIT Press, Cambridge MA 521-528
2. Berthold M.R., and Diamond J. Constructive training of probabilistic neural networks. Neurocomputing 19 1-3 (1998) 167-183
3. C. Blake, C. Merz, UCI repository of machine learning databases, available from 〈http://www.ics.uci.edu/_mlearn/MLRepository.html〉, 1998.
4. Burges C.J.C. Simplified support vector decision rules. In: Lorenza Saitta (Ed). Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Machine Learning (1996), Morgan Kaufman, Bari, Italy 71-77
5. Burges C.J.C. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery vol. 2 (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 121-167
6. Downs T., Gates K.E., and Masters A. Exact simplification of support vector solutions. J Mach. Learn. Res. 2 (2001) 293-297
7. Haykin S. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. second ed (1999), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
8. C. Hsu, C. Chang, C. Lin, A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classification, available at 〈http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdf〉, 2003.
9. Huang G.-B., and Siew C.-K. Extreme learning machine with randomly assigned RBF kernels. Int. J. Inform. Technol. 11 1 (2005) 6-24
10. Oliveira A.L.I., Melo B.J.M., and Meira S.R.L. Improving constructive training of RBF networks through selective pruning and model selection. Neurocomputing 64 (2005) 537-541
11. Oliveira A.L.I., Melo B.J.M., and Meira S.R.L. Integrated method for constructive training of radial basis function networks. Electron. Lett. 41 7 (2005) 429-430
12. E. Osuna, F. Girosi, Reducing the run-time complexity of support vector machines, Proceedings of ICPR'98, Brisbane, Australia, 1998.
13. Paetz J. Reducing the number of neurons in radial basis function networks with dynamic decay adjustment. Neurocomputing 62 (2004) 79-91
14. S.A. Rahman, M. Saito, M. Okada, H. Yamamoto, An MC-CDMA signal equalization and detection scheme based on support vector machines, First International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems, Mauritius, September 2004, pp. 11-15.
15. Schölkopf B., Mika S., Burges C.J.C., Knirsch P., Müller K.-R., Rätsch G., and Smola A.J. Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 10 5 (1999) 1000-1017
16. Schölkopf B., Sung K.-K., Burges C.J.C., Girosi F., Niyogi P., Poggio T., and Vapnik V. Comparing support vector machines with gaussian kernels to radial basis function classifiers. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 45 11 (1997) 2758-2765
17. 〈http://www.kernel-machines.org/〉