Journals used for the publication of English psychiatry, surgery and paediatrics research

Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 278-290

  Jones, Teresa ^a   Hanney, Steve ^a   Buxton, Martin ^a   Rippon, Isla ^b  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Financing; Journals; Paediatrics; Psychiatry; Research work; Surgery

Indexed keywords

JOURNALS; PAEDIATRICS; PSYCHIATRY; RESEARCH OUTPUTS DATABASE (ROD);

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; DATABASE SYSTEMS; FINANCE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; SURGERY; SURVEYS;

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33748374558     PISSN: 0001253X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00012530510599226     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abbasi, K. (2004), "Let's dump impact factors", BMJ, Vol. 329 No. 7471.
2. Bell, J. (2003), "Resuscitating clinical research in the United Kingdom", BMJ, Vol. 327 No. 7422, pp. 1041-3.
3. British Journal of Surgery (2004), available at: www.bjs.co.uk (accessed 2 December).
4. Butler, L. (2001), "Revisiting bibliometric issues using new empirical data", Research Evaluation, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 59-65.
5. Buxton, M. and Hanney, S. (1996), "How can payback from health services research be assessed?", Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 35-43.
6. Buxton, M., Hanney, S., Packwood, T., Roberts, S. and Youll, P. (2000), "Assessing benefits from Department of Health and National Health Services Research and Development", Public Money and Management, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 29-34.
7. Coomarasamy, A., Gee, H., Publicover, M. and Khan, K.S. (2001), "Medical journals and effective dissemination of health research", Health Information and Libraries Journal, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 183-91.
8. Croxson, B., Hanney, S. and Buxton, M. (2001), "Routine monitoring of performance: what makes health research and development different?", Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 226-32.
9. Dawson, G., Lucocq, B., Cottrell, R. and Lewison, G. (1998), Mapping the Landscape: National Biomedical Research Outputs 1988-95, The Wellcome Trust, London.
10. Department of Health (2004), "Research and development", available at: http://.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/ResearchAndDevelopment/fs/en (accessed 27 June).
11. Garfield, E. (1996), "How can impact factors be improved", BMJ, Vol. 313 No. 7054, pp. 411-13.
12. Garfield, E. (2001), "The impact factor", Institute for Scientific Information, Thomson Scientific, available at: www.isinet.com/essays/ journalcitationreports/7.html/ (accessed 14 October 2004).
13. Glänzel, W. and Moed, H.F. (2002), "Journal impact measures in bibliometric research", Scientometrics, Vol. 53 No. 2, pp. 171-93.
14. Hanney, S., Grant, J., Wooding, S. and Buxton, M. (2004), "Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of health research: the impact of funding by the UK's Arthritis Research Campaign", Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 1-11.
15. Hanney, S., Mugford, M., Grant, J. and Buxton, M. (2005), "Assessing the benefits of health research: lessons from research into the use of antenatal corticosteroids for the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome", Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 60 No. 5, pp. 937-47.
16. Harrison, A. and New, B. (2002), Public Interest, Private Decisions: Health-related Research in the UK, King's Fund, London.
17. Jones, T., Hanney, S., Buxton, M. and Burns, T. (2004), "What British psychiatrists read: questionnaire survey of journal usage among clinicians", British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 185 No. 3, pp. 251-7.
18. Lewison, G. (2003), "Beyond outputs: a new measure of biomedical research impact", Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 55 Nos. 1/2, pp. 32-42.
19. Lewison, G. (2004), "Citations to papers from other documents", in Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W. and Schmoch, U. (Eds), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 457-72.
20. Lewison, G., Rafferty, A. and Traynor, M. (2001), "Is nursing research typical of biomedical research?", Research Evaluation, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 97-103.
21. Saha, S., Saint, S. and Christakis, D. (2003), "Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?", Journal of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 91 No. 1, pp. 42-6.
22. Schein, M., Paladugu, R., Sutija, V. and Wise, L. (2000), "What American surgeons read: a survey of 1,000 Fellows of the American College of Surgeons", Current Surgery, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 252-8.
23. Schwartz, S. and Lopez Hellin, J. (1996), "Measuring the impact of scientific publications: the case of the biomedical sciences", Scientometrics, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 119-32.
24. Seglen, P. (1997), "Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research", BMJ, Vol. 314 No. 7079, pp. 497-502.
25. Tenopir, C., King, D. and Bush, A. (2004), "Medical faculties' use of print and electronic journals: changes over time and in comparison with scientists", Journal of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 92 No. 2, pp. 233-41.
26. Tyrer, P. (2004), "From the editor's desk", British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 185 No. 3, p. 276.
27. Wellcome Trust and NHS Executive (2001), Putting NHS Research on the Map. An Analysis of Scientific Publications in England, 1990-97, Wellcome Trust, NHS Executive, London.
28. Yamazaki, S. (1995), "Refereeing system of 29 life-science journals preferred by Japanese scientists", Scientometrics, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 123-9.
29. Zetterstrom, R. (1999), "Impact factor and the future of Acta Paediatrica and other European medical journals", Acta Paediatrica, Vol. 88 No. 8, pp. 793-6.