Coherent control of retinal isomerization in bacteriorhodopsin

Science

Volumn 313, Issue 5791, 2006, Pages 1257-1261

  Prokhorenko, Valentyn I ^a   Nagy, Andrea M ^a   Waschuk, Stephen A ^b   Brown, Leonid S ^b   Birge, Robert R ^c   Miller, R J Dwayne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ISOMERIZATION; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; PHASE MODULATION; PHOTONS; PROTEINS;

BACTERIORHODOPSIN; DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE; ELECTRONIC STATES; RETINAL ISOMERIZATION;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS;

BACTERIORHODOPSIN;

BACTERIUM; BIOACTIVITY; PIGMENT; PROTEIN; WAVE PROPERTY;

ARTICLE; CHROMATOPHORE; ENERGY; ISOMERIZATION; KINETICS; LIGHT; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; OPTICS; OSCILLATION; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; PHOTON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTUM MECHANICS; RETINA; VIBRATION;

ALGORITHMS; BACTERIORHODOPSINS; HALOBACTERIUM SALINARUM; ISOMERISM; KINETICS; LASERS; LIGHT; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; PHOTONS; QUANTUM THEORY; RETINALDEHYDE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 33748335405     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1130747     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. M. Shapiro, P. Brumer, Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 859 (2003).
2. S. H. Shi, H. Rabitz, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 364 (1990).
3. W. T. Pollard, S. Y. Lee, R. A. Mathies, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 4012 (1990).
4. Q. Wang, R. W. Schoenlein, L. A. Peteanu, R. A. Mathies, C. V. Shank, Science 266, 422 (1994).
5. K. C. Hasson, F. Gai, P. A. Anfinrud, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 15124 (1996).
6. T. Ye et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 103, S122 (1999).
7. R. Gonzalez-Luque et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 9379 (2000).
8. T. Kobayashi, T. Saito, H. Ohtani, Nature 414, 531 (2001).
9. J. Herbst, K. Heyne, R. Diller, Science 297, 822 (2002).
10. J. T. M. Kennis et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 6067 (2002).
11. S. Hayashi, E. Tajkhorshid, K. Schulten, Biophys. J. 85, 1440 (2003).
12. S. C. Flores, V. S. Batista, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 6745 (2004).
13. Y. Ohtsuki, K. Ohara, M. Abe, K. Nakagami, Y. Fujimura, Chem. Phys. Lett. 369, 525 (2003).
14. G. Vogt, G. Krampert, P. Niklaus, P. Nuernberger, G. Gerber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 068305 (2005).
15. K. Hoki, P. Brumer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 168305 (2005).
16. J. L. Herek, W. Wohlleben, R. J. Cogdell, D. Zeidler, M. Motzkus, Nature 417, 533 (2002).
17. J. Tittor, D. Oesterhelt, FEBS Lett. 263, 269 (1990).
18. S. L. Logunov, M. A. El-Sayed, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 6629 (1997).
19. H. J. Polland et al., Biophys. J. 49, 651 (1986).
20. F. Gai, K. C. Basson, J. C. McDonald, P. A. Anfinrud, Science 279, 1886 (1998).
21. See supporting data on Science Online.
22. V. I. Prokhorenko, A. M. Nagy, R. J. D. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 184502 (2005).
23. A. K. Dioumaev, V. V. Savransky, N. V. Tkachenko, V. I. Chukharev, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 3, 397 (1989).
24. G. Schneider, R. Diller, M. Stockburger, Chem. Phys. 131, 17 (1989).
25. A. Xie, Biophys. J. 58, 1127 (1990).
26. S. P. Balashov, E. S. Imasheva, R. Govindjee, T. G. Ebrey, Photochem. Photobiol. 54, 955 (1991).
27. J. Paye, IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 28, 2262 (1992).
28. H. L. Fragnito, J.-Y. Bigot, P. C. Becker, C. V. Shank, Chem. Phys. Lett. 160, 101 (1989).
29. A. B. Myers, R. A. Harris, R. A. Mathies J. Chem. Phys. 79, 603 (1983).
30. B. X. Hou, N. Friedman, M. Ottolenghi, M. Sheves, S. Ruhman, Chem. Phys. Lett. 381, 549 (2003).
31. R. Morita, M. Yamashita, A. Suguro, H. Shigekawa, Opt. Commun. 197, 73 (2001).
32. K. Blum, Density Matrix Theory and Applications (Plenum, New York, 1981).
33. D. Gelman, R. Kosloff, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 234506 (2005).
34. J. Hauer, H. Skenderovic, K.-L. Kompa, M. Motzkus, Chem. Phys. Lett. 421, 523 (2006).
35. D. Oesterhelt, W. Stoeckenius, in Methods in Enzymology, vol. 31 of Biomembranes (Academic Press, New York, 1974), pp. 667-678.
36. A is Avogadro's number.
37. k/kl, where λ= 0.0236, and k is the number of occurrences (k = 1 for the single excitation, k = 2 for the double excitation, etc.). Thus, the fraction of double-excited molecules f(2)/f(1) = λ/2; that is, 1.18%.
38. V. F. Kamalov, T. M. Masciangioli, M. A. El-Sayed, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 2762 (1996).
39. K. Edman et al., Nature 401, 822 (1999).
40. This work was supported by the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. The authors thank J.T.M. Kennis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, for helpful discussions of preliminary results.