Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine

International Endodontic Journal

Volumn 39, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 809-818

  Bitter, K ^a   Meyer Lueckel, H ^a   Priehn, K ^a   Kanjuparambil, J P ^a   Neumann, K ^a   Kielbassa, A M ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fibre posts; Luting agents; Push out bond strengths; Root canal dentine; Thermocycling

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTIN; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SHEAR STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PULP;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; CUSPID; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 33748333318     PISSN: 01432885     EISSN: 13652591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01155.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abo-Hamar SE, Miller K-A, Jung H et al. (2005) Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentln and enamel, Clinical Oral Investigations 9, 161-7.
2. Art H, Yasar E, Belli S (2003) Effects of NaOCl on bond strengths of resin cements to root canal dentin. Journal of Endodontics 29, 248-51.
3. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T (1999) Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. Journal of Dentistry 27, 275-8.
4. Bitter K, Paris S, Martus P, Schartner R, Kielbassa AM (2004) A confocal laser scanning microscope investigation of different dental adhesives bonded to root canal dentine. International Endodontic Journal 37, 840-8.
5. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC et al. (2003) Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin, Dental Materials 19, 199-205.
6. Cormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P (2001) In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration, Journal of Prosthodontics 10, 26-36.
7. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1993) Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dental Materials 9, 2-5.
8. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagldiaco MC, Mjör TA (2000) Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. American Journal of Dentistry 13, 255-60.
9. Ferrari M, Mason PN, Goracci C, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2004) Collagen degradation in endodontically treated teeth after clinical function. Journal of Dental Research 83, 414-9.
10. Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Miura H (2005) Adhesion to root canal dentine using one and two-step adhesives with dual-cure composite core materials. Journal of Ural Rehabilitation 32, 97-104.
11. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A (1999a) Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives, Clinical Oral Investigations 3, 11-7.
12. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Kramer N, Petschelt A (1999b) Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Operative Dentistry 24, 147-55.
13. Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Reich SM et al. (2005) Characterisation of resin-dentine interfaces by compressive cyclic loading. Biomaterials 26, 2043-52.
14. Gale MS, Darvell BW (1999) Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations, Journal of Dentistry 27, 89-99.
15. Gaston BA, West LA, Liewehr FR, Fernandes C, Pashley DH (2001) Evaluation of regional bond strength of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. Journal of Endodontics 27, 321-4.
16. Goracci C, Tavares AU, Monticelli F et al. (2004) The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strengths measurements. European Journal of Oral Science 112, 353-61.
17. Goracci C, Fabianelli A, Sadek FT et al. (2005) The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. Journal of Endodontics 31, 608-12.
18. Helfer AR, Melnick S, Schilder H (1972) Determination of the moisture content of vital and pulpless teeth, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology 34, 661-70.
19. Mallmann A, Jacques L, Valandro L, Mathias P, Muench A (2005) Mlcrotensile bond strength of light- and self-cured adhesive to intraradlcular dentin using a translucent fiber post. Operative Dentistry 30, 500-6.
20. Mannocci F, Sherriff M, Watson TF (2001) Three-point bending test of fiber posts. Journal of Endodontics 27, 758-61.
21. Mjör IA, Smith MR, Ferrari M, Mannocci F (2001) The structure of dentine In the apical region of human teeth. International Endodontic Journal 34, 346-53.
22. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer H-C, Sorensen JA (2005) The shear bond strength between luting cements and Ülrconia ceramics after two pre-treatments. Operative Dentistry 30, 382-8.
23. Reich SM, Wichmann M, Frankenberger R, Zajc D (2005) Effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of three resin cements to a machinable feldspatic ceramic. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B: Applied Biomaterials 74, 740-6.
24. Sorensen JA, Martin off JT (1984) Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 51, 780-4.
25. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH (1996) Resin permeation into acid-conditioned, moist, and dry dentin: a paradigm using water-free adhesive primers. Journal of Dental Research 75, 1034-44.
26. Tay FR, Sano H, Carvalho R, Pashley EL, Pashley DH (2000) An ultrastructural study of the influence of acidity of selfetching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2, 83-98.
27. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN, Pashley DH (2005) Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding In root canals: a theoretical modeling approach, Journal of Endodontics 31, 584-9.
28. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y et al. (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges, Operative Dentistry 28, 215-35.