Native and introduced pollinators promote a self-incompatible invasive woody vine (Paederia foetida L) in Florida

Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society

Volumn 133, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 304-311

  Liu, Hong ^a,c   Pemberton, Robert W ^b   Stiling, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b INVASIVE PLANT RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breeding system; Halictid bees; Honey bees; Introduced species; Invasive species; Mutualism; Paederia foetida; Plant animal interaction; Plant insect interaction; Pollen limitation; Pollination; Pollinator limitation; Self incompatibility; Skunk vine

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; FLORAL TRAIT; FLOWER VISITING; HABITAT STRUCTURE; HONEYBEE; INVASIVE SPECIES; MUTUALISM; NATIVE SPECIES; POLLINATION; POLLINATOR; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; VINE; WOODY PLANT;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; HAWAII [(ISL) HAWAIIAN ISLANDS]; HAWAII [UNITED STATES]; HAWAIIAN ISLANDS; NORTH AMERICA; PACIFIC ISLANDS; PACIFIC OCEAN; UNITED STATES;

APINAE; APIS MELLIFERA; APOIDEA; CARNIVORA; HALICTIDAE; PAEDERIA FOETIDA;

EID: 33748270070     PISSN: 10955674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3159/1095-5674(2006)133[304:NAIPPA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. AIZEN, M. A. AND P. FEINSINGER. 1994. Habitat fragmentation, native insect pollinators, and feral honey bees in Argentine Chaco Serrano. Ecol. Appl. 4: 378-392.
2. ALLARD, R. W. 1965. Genetic systems associated with colonizing ability in predominantly self-pollinated species, p. 49-76. In H. G. Baker and G. L. Stebbins [eds.], The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York, NY.
3. ALPERT, P. In press. The advantages and disadvantages of being introduced. Biol. Invasions.
4. ASHMAN, T. L., T. M. KNIGHT, J. A. STEETS, P. AMARASEKARE, M. BURD, D. R. CAMPBELL, M. R. DUDASH, M. O. JOHNSTON, S. J. MAZER, R. J. MITCHELL, M. T MORGAN, AND W. G. WILSON. 2004. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85: 2408-2421.
5. BAKER, H. G. 1962. Weeds-native and introduced. J. Calif. Hortic. Soc. 23: 97-104.
6. BAKER, H. G. 1965. Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds, p. 147-172. In H. G. Baker and G. L. Stebbins [eds.], The Genetics of Colonizing Species. Academic Press, New York, NY.
7. BROWN, A. H. D. AND D. R. MARSHALL. 1981. Evolutionary changes accompanying colonization in plants, pp. 351-363. In: G. G. E. Scudder and J. L. Reveal [eds.], Evolution Today. Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
8. BURD, M. 1994. Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot. Rev. 60: 83-139.
9. CAVERS, P. B., M. I. HEAGY, AND R. F. KOKRON. 1979. The biology of Canadian weeds. 35. Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieb.) Cavara and Grande. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59: 217-229.
10. DIERINGER, G. 1999. Reproductive biology of Agalinis skinneriana (Scrophulariaceae), a threatened species. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 126: 289-295.
11. FENSTER, C. B., W S. ARMBRUSTER, P. WILSON, M. R. DUDASH, AND J. D. THOMSON. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35: 375-403.
12. FIELD, A. 2004. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS for Windows. SAGE Publications, London, UK.
13. GANN, G. AND D. GORDON. 1998. Paederia foetida (skunk vine) and P. cruddasiana (sewer vine): Threats and management strategies. Natl. Areas J. 18: 169-174.
14. GERLACH J. D. JR. AND K. J. RICE. 2003. Testing life history correlates of invasiveness using congeneric plant species. Ecol. Appl. 13: 167-179.
15. GODFREE, R., B. LEPSCHI, AND D. MALLINSON. 2004. Ecological filtering of exotic plants in an Australian sub-alpine environment. J. Veg. Sci. 15: 227-236.
16. HARROD, R. J. AND R. J. TAYLOR. 1995. Reproduction and pollination biology of Centaurea and Acroptilon species, with emphasis on C. diffusa. Northwest Sci. 69: 97-105.
17. JOHNSON, S. D. AND E. J. BOND. 1997. Evidence for widespread pollen limitation of fruiting success in Cape wildflowers. Oecologia 109: 530-534.
18. KEARNS, C. A. AND D. W. INOUYE. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University of Colorado Press, Niwot, CO.
19. LANGELAND, K. A. AND K. CRADDOCK BURKS (eds.). 1998. Identification and Biology of Non-native Plants in Florida's Native Areas. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
20. LEE, S. L., R. WICKNESWARI, M. C. MAHANI, AND A. H. ZAKRI. 2000. Mating system parameters in a tropical tree species, Shorea leprosula (Dipterocarpaceae), from Malaysian Lowland Dipterocarp Forest. Biotropica 32: 693-702.
21. LEVIN, D. A. 1970. Assortative pollination in Lythrum. Am. J. Bot. 57: 1-5.
22. LIU, H. AND S. KOPTUR. 2003. Breeding system and pollination of a narrowly endemic herb of the Lower Florida Keys: Impacts of the Urban Wildland Interface. Am. J. Bot. 90: 1180-1187.
23. MICHENER, C. D. 2000. The Bees of the World. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
24. NISHIZAWA, T. Y. WATANO, E. KINOSHITA, T. KAWAHARA, AND K. UEDA. 2005. Pollen movement in a natural population of Arisaema serratum (Araceae), a plant with a pitfall-trap flower pollination system. Am. J. Bot. 92: 1114-1123.
25. OLSEN, K. M. 1997. Pollination effectiveness and pollinator importance in a population of Heterotheca subaxillaris (Asteraceae). Oecologia 109: 114-121.
26. PARKER, I. M. 1997. Pollinator limitation of Cytisus scoparius (scotch broom), an invasive exotic shrub. Ecology 78: 1457-1470.
27. PARKER, I. M. AND K. I. HAUBENSAK. 2002. Comparative pollinator limitation of two non-native shrubs: do mutualisms influence invasions? Oecologia 130: 250-258.
28. PEMBERTON, R. W. AND P. D. PRATT. 2002. Skunk vine (Paederia foetida), p. 343-351. In R. Van Driesche, B. Blossey, M. Hoddle, S. Lyon and R. Reardon [eds.], Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States. US Forest Service Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team-2002-04, Morgantown, WV.
29. PRICE, M. V. AND N. W. WASER. 1982. Experimental studies of pollen carryover: hummingbirds and lpomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 54: 353-358.
30. PUFF, C. 1991a. Revision of the genus Paederia in Asia, p. 207-289. In C. Puff [ed.], The Genus Paederia L. (Rubiaceae- Paederieae): A Multidisciplinary Study. Opera Botanica Belgica 3.
31. PUFF, C. 1991b. Selected aspects of the reproductive biology of Paederia L. (Rubiaceae-Paederieae), p. 167-178. In Puff, C. (ed.) The Genus Paederia L. (Rubiaceae- Paederieae): A Multidisciplinary Study. Opera Botanica Belgica 3.
32. RAMBUDA, R. D. AND S. D. JOHNSON. 2004. Breeding systems of invasive alien plants in South Africa: does Baker's rule apply? Divers. Distrib. 10: 409-416.
33. REICHARD, S. E. 1994. Assessing the potential of invasiveness in woody plants introduced to North America. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
34. RICHARDSON, D. M., N. ALLSOPP, C. M. D'ANTONIO, S. J. MILTON, AND M. REJMANEK 2000. Plant invasions-the role of mutualisms. Biol. Rev. 75: 65-93.
35. SCHUELLER, S. K. 2004. Self-pollination in island and mainland populations of the introduced humming-bird-pollinated plant, Nicotiana glauca (Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot. 91: 672-681.
36. SPEARS, E. E. 1983. A direct measure of pollinator effectiveness. Oecologia 57: 196-199.
37. STANTON, M. L. 1987. Reproductive biology of petal color variants in wild populations of Raphanus salivas: II. Factors limiting seed production. Am. J. Bot. 74: 188-196.
38. VILA, M., E. WEBER, AND C. M. D'ANTONIO. 1998. Pollination and seed set in hybrid and parental morphotypes of Carpobrotus in California. Can. J. Bot. 76: 1165-1169.