Family interventions for drug and alcohol misuse: Is there a best practice?

Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 271-276

  Copello, Alex G ^a,c   Templeton, Lorna ^b   Velleman, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

^c Birmingham and Solihull Substance Misuse Services   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Drugs; Family; Intervention; Social networks; Substance misuse

Indexed keywords

ILLICIT DRUG;

ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS; ALCOHOLISM; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COPING BEHAVIOR; DEPRESSION; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; DRUG MISUSE; FAMILY RELATION; FAMILY THERAPY; GROUP THERAPY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MARITAL THERAPY; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CRISIS INTERVENTION; FAMILY; HUMANS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 33748168700     PISSN: 09517367     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.yco.0000218597.31184.41     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Orford J, Natera G, Copello A, et al. Coping with alcohol and drug problems: the experiences of family members in three contrasting cultures. London: Taylor and Francis; 2005. This research-based book provides a major review of the literature on the experiences of family members who live with substance misusers and discusses evidence collected from families living in England, Mexico City and Aboriginal Australia. The set of core experiences of being a family member of a substance misuser does not seem to vary much across the globe.
2. Copello A, Orford J. Addiction and the family: is it time for services to take notice of the evidence? Addiction 2002; 97:1361-1363.
3. Copello A, Velleman R, Templeton L. Family interventions in the treatment of alcohol and drug problems. Drug Alcohol Rev 2005; 24:369-385. A comprehensive review of the evidence for family interventions in the treatment of alcohol and drug problems supporting wider use of these interventions in routine practice.
4. Velleman R, Templeton L, Copello A. The role of the family in preventing and intervening with substance use and misuse: a comprehensive review of family interventions with a focus on young people. Drug Alcohol Rev 2005; 24:93-109. A comprehensive review of the role of families in preventing and intervening with substance use and misuse in young people.
5. Stanton D, Shadish W. Outcome attrition, and family-couples treatment for drug abuse: a meta-analysis and review of the controlled, comparative studies. Psychol Bull 1997; 2:170-191.
6. Fals-Stewart W, O'Farrell T, Birchler G. Behavioural couples therapy for substance abuse: rationale, methods and findings. Sci Pract Perspect 2004; 2:30-41.
7. Miller W, Wilbourne P. Mesa Grande: a methodological analysis of clinical trials of treatments for alcohol use disorders. Addiction 2002; 97:265-277.
8. Smith JE, Meyers RJ. Motivating substance abusers to enter treatment: working with family members. New York: Guildford Press; 2004.
9. Liddle H. Family-based therapies for adolescent alcohol and drug use: research contributions and future research needs. Addiction 2004; 99: 76-92.
10. Austin A, Macgowan M, Wagner E. Effective family-based interventions for adolescents with substance use problems: a systematic review. Res Social Work Pract 2005; 15:67-83. A recent systematic review adding to the evidence base for family therapy approaches with adolescent substance misusers.
11. Copello A, Orford J, Hodgson R, et al. Social behaviour and network therapy: basic principles and early experiences. Addict Behav 2002; 27:345-366.
12. UKATT Research Team. Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK Alcohol Treatment Trial. BMJ 2005; 331:541-544. This key paper makes a significant contribution to the alcohol treatment literature by reporting the results of a carefully designed and conducted large pragmatic, randomised, comparative trial of the effectiveness of SBNT, a novel treatment for alcohol problems with that of the proved MET. The social treatment did not differ in effectiveness from the motivational one.
13. UKATT Research Team. Cost-effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK Alcohol Treatment Trial. BMJ 2005; 331:544-558. This paper reports the results of cost-effectiveness analysis of the UKATT showing that the two treatments did not differ significantly in cost-effectiveness and that both therapies saved about five times as much in expenditure on health and social and criminal justice as they cost. This is an important paper as the cost-effectiveness analysis was based on the collection of prospective data as part of the trial design.
14. Tober G, Godfrey C, Parrott S, et al. Setting standards for training and competence: the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial. Alcohol Alcohol 2005; 40:413-418. A paper describing in detail the training processes used in the UKATT with important implications for implementation of treatments in routine practice.
15. Walitzer K, Dermen K. Alcohol-focused spouse involvement and behavioural couples therapy: evaluation of enhancements to drinking reduction treatment for male problem drinkers. J Consult Clin Psychol 2004; 72:944-955. A carefully designed study from this experienced research group providing further evidence to support alcohol-focused spouse involvement in alcohol problems moderation treatment.
16. Rychtarik RG, McGillicuddy NB. Coping skills training and 12-step facilitation for women whose partner has alcoholism: effects on depression, the partner's drinking, and partner physical violence. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005; 73:249-261. A robust and carefully conducted randomized trial comparing structured interventions to help female partners of men with drinking problems.
17. Tracy S, Kelly J, Moos R. The influence of partner status, relationship quality and relationship stability on outcomes following intensive substance-use disorder treatment. J Stud Alcohol 2005; 66:497-505. An important study examining the influence of relationship variables on alcohol treatment outcomes. The study is well designed, has a large sample and discusses important clinical implications.
18. Kidorf M, King V, Neufeld K, et al. Involving significant others in the care of opioid dependent patients receiving methadone. J Subst Abuse Treat 2005; 29:19-27. An interesting study reporting the evaluation of a family-based intervention that aims to involve a wide range of significant others in methadone treatment.
19. Copello A, Williamson E, Orford J, Day E. Implementing and evaluating social behaviour and network therapy in drug treatment practice in the UK: a feasibility study. Addict Behav 2005 [Epub ahead of print].
20. Slesnick N, Prestopnik JL. Ecologically based family therapy outcome with substance abusing runaway adolescents. J Adolesc 2005; 28:277-298. This paper reports the findings of a comparison of a family-based intervention to services as usual in two runaway shelters. It is important as it focuses on a high-risk group and includes a comparison group.
21. Orford J, Templeton L, Velleman R, Copello A. Family members of relatives with alcohol, drug and gambling problems: a set of standardised questionnaires for assessing stress, coping and strain. Addiction 2005; 11:1611-1624. The description and psychometric properties of a set of standardized measures for assessing the needs of family members, and the therapeutic outcomes for them following interventions.
22. Kirby K, Dugosh K, Benishek L, Harrington V. The significant other checklist: measuring the problems experienced by family members of drug users. Addict Behav 2005; 30:29-47. The authors describe the development and preliminary evaluation of a quantitative scale to measure the experiences of family members affected by drug problems.
23. Benishek L, Dugosh K, Faranda-Diedrich T, Kirby K. Development of the significant other survey: an interview for family members of substance users. Am J Family Ther 2006; 34:33-46. The authors describe a structured interview that can be used to measure outcome and conduct assessments of family members in clinical practice.
24. McCrady B. To have but one true friend: implications for practice of research on alcohol use disorders and social networks. Psychol Addict Behav 2004; 18:113-121.
25. Velleman R. The importance of family members in helping problem drinkers achieve their chosen goal. Addict Res Theory (in press).
26. Fals-Stewart W, Birchler G. A national survey of the use of couples therapy in substance abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat 2001; 20:277-283.
27. Fals-Stewart W, Logsdon T, Birchler G. Diffusion of an empirically supported treatment for substance abuse: an organizational autopsy of technology transfer success and failure. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2004; 11:117-182.
28. Velleman R, Templeton L. Reaching out - promoting resilience in the children of substance misusers. In: Evans D, Harbin F, Murphy M, editors. Secret lives: living with substance: a guide for practitioners/managers who work directly with children who live in substance misusing families. Lyme Regis: Russell House (in press).