Stroke rehabilitation outcome: The Turkish experience

International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 105-111

  Gökkaya, Nilüfer ^a   Aras, Meltem ^a,c   Cardenas, Diana ^b   Kaya, Ayşe ^a  

^a Etlik Education and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Turan Gunes Bulvari   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Complications; Outcome; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; HOSPITALS; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; PATIENT TREATMENT;

COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOME; STROKE; TOTAL FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMORBIDITY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEART DISEASE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; JOINT FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSOCIAL DISORDER; SHOULDER; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REHABILITATION CENTERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TURKEY;

EID: 33748153613     PISSN: 03425282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mrr.0000191852.03317.2b     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Cifu DX, Stewart DG (1999). Factors affecting functional outcome after stroke: a critical review of rehabilitation interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:S35-S39.
2. Davenport RJ, Dennis MS, Wellwood I, Warlow CP (1996). Complications after acute stroke. Stroke 27:415-420.
3. Dombovy M (1991). Stroke: clinical course and neurophysiologic mechanisms of recovery. Crit Rev Phys Med Rehabil 2:171-188.
4. Doshi VS, Say JH, Young S, Doraisamy P (2003). Complications in stroke patients: a study carried out at the Rehabilitation Medicine Service, Changi General Hospital. Singapore Med J 44:643-652.
5. Dromerick A, Reding M (1994). Medical and neurological complications during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 25:358-361.
6. Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, Mohr JP, Hier DB (1988). The stroke data bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke 19:547-554.
7. Giaquinto S, Buzzelli S, Di Francesco L, Lottarini A, Montenero P, Tonin P, et al. (1999). On the prognosis of outcome after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 100:201-208.
8. Glass TA, Matchar DB, Belyea M (1993). Impact of social support on outcome in first stroke. Stroke 24:64-70.
9. Granger CV, Hamilton BB (1994). The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1992. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 73:51-55.
10. Inouye M, Kishi K, Ikeda Y, Takada M, Katoh J, Iwahashi M, et al. (2000). Prediction of functional outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 79:513-518.
11. Johnston M, Kirshblum S, Zorowitz R, Shiflett SC (1993). Prediction of outcomes following rehabilitation of stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation 2:51-76.
12. Johnston KC, Li JY, Lyden PD, Hanson SK, Feasby TE, Adams RJ, et al. (1998). Medical and neurological complications of ischemic stroke: experience from the RANTTAS trial. RANTTAS investigators. Stroke 29:447-453.
13. Jongbloed J (1986). Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke 17:765-775.
14. Kalra L, Yu G, Wilson K, Roots P (1995). Medical complications during stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 26:990-994.
15. Kucukdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant A (2001). Adaptation of the functional independence measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil 15:311-319.
16. Langhorne P, Stott DJ, Robertson L, MacDonald J, Jones L, McAlpine C, et al. (2000). Medical complications after stroke. A multicenter study. Stroke 31:1223-1229.
17. Lew HL, Lee E, Date ES, Zeiner H (2002). Influence of medical comorbidities and complications on FIM change and length of stay during inpatient rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81:830-837.
18. McLean D (2004). Medical complications experienced by a cohort of stroke survivors during inpatient, tertiary-level stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:466-469.
19. Murakami M, Inouye M (2002). Stroke rehabilitation outcome study. A comparison of Japan with the United States. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81:279-282.
20. Novack TA, Satterfield WT, Lyons K, Kolski G, Hackmeyer L, Connor M (1984). Stroke onset and rehabilitation: time lag as a factor in treatment outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 65:316-319.
21. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, Morelli D, Troisi E, Coiro P, et al. (2000). Early versus delayed inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a matched comparison conducted in Italy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:695-700.
22. Ring H, Feder M, Schwartz J (1997). Functional measures of first stroke rehabilitation inpatients: usefulness of Functional Independence Measure total score with a clinical rationale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78:630-635.
23. Roth EJ, Lovell R, Richard L, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Diaz S (2001). Incidence of and risk factors for medical complications. Stroke 32:523-529.
24. Santus G, Ranzenigo A, Caregnato R, Inzoli MR (1990). Social and family integration of hemiplegic elderly patients 1 year after stroke. Stroke 21:1019-1022.
25. Sawner K, Lavigne J (1992). Brunnstrom movement therapy in hemiplegia: a neurophysiological approach. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
26. Sze K, Wong E, Lum CM, Woo J (2000). Factors predicting stroke disability at discharge: a study of 793 Chinese. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:876-880.
27. Wade D, Skillbeck C, Hewer R (1983). Predicting Barthel ADL at 6 months after an acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 64:24-28.
28. Wilson DB, Houle DM, Keith RA (1991). Stroke rehabilitation: a model predicting return home. West J Med 154:587-590.
29. Yavuzer G, Kucukdeveci A, Arasil T, Elhan A (2001). Rehabilitation of stroke patients. Clinical profile and functional outcome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 80:250-255.