Evidence-based practice and health policy development: the link between knowledge and action

Physiotherapy

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 14-21

  Jones, Ruth J E ^a   Santaguida, Pasqualina ^b  

^a Canadian Academy of the Arts   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evidence based practice; Knowledge transfer; Public policy; Research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE;

EID: 33748152733     PISSN: 00319406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2004.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Muir Gray J.A. Evidence-based policy making. In: Haines A., and Donald A. (Eds). Getting research findings into practice. 2nd ed. (2002), BMJ Books, London 154-161
2. Haines A., and Donald A. Getting research findings into practice: making better use of research findings. BMJ 317 (1998) 72-75
3. Goel V., and Naylor D. Using research and evaluation results in health services policy making. In: Dunn E.V., Norton P.G., Stewart M., Tudiver F., and Bass M.J. (Eds). Disseminating research, changing practice (1994), Sage, London 199
4. Sackett D., Rosenberg W., Gray J., Haynes R., and Richardson W. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 312 (1996) 71-72
5. McKibbon KA. Definitions of evidence based practice [listing on the Internet] 1998 [cited 17 June 2002]. Available from: http://www.shef.ac.uk/∼scharr/ir/def.html.
6. Bithell C. Evidence-based physiotherapy: some thoughts on best evidence. Physiotherapy 86 2 (2000) 58-60
7. Hammond R. Evaluation of physiotherapy by measuring the outcome. Physiotherapy 86 4 (2000) 170-172
8. Wakefield A. Evidence-based physiotherapy: the case for pragmatic randomised controlled trials. Physiotherapy; 86(8):384-96.
9. Morris J. Evidence-based practice: the way forward. Physiotherapy 89 6 (2003) 330-331
10. Hurley M. Linking research with practice: the missing link-collaboration. Physiotherapy 86 7 (2000) 339-341
11. Jadad A.R. Randomized controlled trials (1998), BMJ Books, London
12. Dobrow M.J., Goel V., and Upshur R.E.G. Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation. Soc Sci Med 58 (2004) 207-217
13. Buetow S., and Kenealy T. Evidence-based medicine: the need for a new definition. J Eval Clin Pract 6 2 (2000) 85-92
14. Glickman R.J. The research commitment: some observations. Assoc Dept Foreign Languages Bull 18 3 (1987) 39-40
15. McEwan P. On the relationship between knowledge and action in health policy. Soc Sci Med 36 1 (1993) v-vii
16. Boase J. Shifting sands: government-group relationships in the health care sector (1994), McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal p. 168
17. Caplan N. The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. Am Behav Sci 22 3 (1979) 459-470
18. Estabrooks C. Mapping the research utilization field in nursing. Can J Nursing Res 31 1 (1999) 53-72
19. Ross S. Creating bodies of knowledge around the needs of decision-makers [article on the Internet] 2001 [cited 11 November 2002]. Available from: http://www.researchtopolicy.ca/.
20. Strang D., and Meyer J. Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory Soc 22 (1993) 487-511
21. Lomas J. Diffusion, dissemination, and implementation: who should do what?. Ann NY Acad Sci 703 (1993) 226-237
22. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. (1995), The Free Press, New York p. 5
23. Kitson A. Research utilization: current issues, questions, and debates. Can J Nursing Res 31 1 (1999) 13-22
24. National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research (NCDDR). A review of the literature on dissemination of knowledge and utilization [article on the Internet] 1996 [cited 16 September 2004]. Available from www.ncddr.org/du/products/litreview.pdf.
25. Bloom's taxonomy. Adapted from Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals [listing on the Internet] 1956 [cited 29 December 2002]. Available from: http://www.coun.uvic.ca/learn/progam/hndouts/bloom.html.
26. Huberman M. Cited in National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research (NCDDR). A review of the literature on dissemination and knowledge utilization [article on the Internet] 1996 [cited 16 September 2004]. Available from www.ncddr/du/products/litreview.pdf.
27. Dobbins M., Ciliska D., Cockerill R., Barnsley J., and DiCenso A. A framework for the dissemination and utilization of research for health care policy and practice (2002), McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton p. 5
28. Foot D. Boom, bust, and echo (2000), Stoddart, Toronto
29. Lavis R (McMaster University: Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis). Ideas, policy learning, and policy change: the determinants-of-health synthesis in Canada and the United Kingdom; 1998. Working Paper 98-6. p. 7.
30. Jones RJ.E. Their rightful place: society and disability (1994), Canadian Academy of the Arts, Toronto
31. Dye T. Policy analysis: what governments do, why they do it, and what difference it makes (1976), University of Alabama Press, Alabama
32. Hamm C., and Hill M. The policy process in the modern capitalist state (1993), Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead p. 4
33. Simon H.A. Organizations (1958), John Wiley, New York p. 169
34. Pal L. Public policy analysis (1987), Methuen, Toronto p. 45
35. Stone D, Maxwell S, Keating M. Bridging research and policy-critical examination of the current thinking on the research to policy process [article on the Internet] 2001 [cited 1 September 2002]. Available from: http://www.gdnet.org/subpages/RAPNet/Bibliography.html.
36. Bennet C., and Howlett M. The lessons of learning: reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sci 25 (1992) 275-294
37. Kernaghan K., and Siegel D. Public administration in Canada (1995), Nelson Canada, Toronto
38. Pross P. Group politics and public policy. 2nd ed. (1992), Oxford University Press, Oxford p. 3
39. Kingdon J. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (1984), Little Brown, Boston p. 170
40. Jones R.J.E. Canada and the United States: an historical and neo-institutional study of public housing and health policies [dissertation] (2000), McMaster University, Hamilton
41. Pierson P. Fragmented welfare states: federal institutions and the development of social policy. Governance 8 4 (1995) 449-478
42. Steinmo S., Thelen K., and Longstreth F. Structuring politics: historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (1992), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
43. Hall P., and Taylor R. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Stud XLIV (1996) 936-957
44. Stone D. Getting research into policy? [article on the Internet] 2002 [cited 1 September 2002]. Available from: http://www.gdnet.org/subpages/RAPNet/Bibliography.html.
45. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Findings: linking research and practice. Basildon Essex: Barnardo's Child Care Publications; 2000. p. 1.
46. Dolowitz D., and Marsh D. Who learns from whom: a review of the policy transfer literature. Political Stud 44 (1996) 343-357
47. Lavis R. Developing a systematic approach to knowledge transfer [article on the Internet] 2002 [cited 11 November 2002]. Available from: http://www.researchtopolicy.ca/.