The Eurasian economic axis: Its present and prospective significance for East Asia

Journal of Asian Studies

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 731-759

  Dent, Christopher M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748116340     PISSN: 00219118     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2700108     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. ABE, A. 1999. Japan and the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
2. ACHARYA, R. 1995. "The Case for China's Accession to the WTO: Options for the EU." In The European Union and China: A European Strategy for the Twenty-First Century, edited by R. Grant. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
3. AKAHA, T., ed. 1999. Politics and Economics in Northeast Asia: Nationalism and Regionalism in Contention. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
4. ALBERT, M. 1993. Capitalism against Capitalism. London: Whurr.
5. BERGSTEN, F. 1997. "Open Regionalism." World Economy 20(5): 545-65.
6. BOBROW, D. B. 1999. "The US and ASEM: Why the Hegemon Didn't Bark." The Pacific Review 12(1):103-28.
7. BOURKE, T. 1996. Japan and the Globalization of European Integration. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
8. BRIDGES, B. 1999. Europe and the Challenge of the Asia-Pacific. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
9. CABLE, V. 1995. "What Is International Economic Security?" International Affairs 71(2):305-24.
10. CASADIO, G. P. 1996. "China's Role in World Trade and Its Re-entry to the GATT: A European View." In Business Transformation in China, edited by H. C. de Bettignies. London: International Thomson Business Press.
11. CHASE-DUNN, C. 1989. Global Formation: Structures of the World Economy. Oxford: Blackwell.
12. CHIA, S. Y. and J. L. H. TAN, eds. 1997. ASEAN and EU: Forging New Linkages and Strategic Alliances. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
13. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES [cited as CEC]. 1994a. Towards a New Asia Strategy. COM(94) 314 final, Brussels.
14. _. 1994b. Recommendations for a Framework Agreement for Trade and Co-operation between the European Community and the Republic of Korea. SEC(94) 1649 final, Brussels.
15. _. 1996a. Investing in Asia's Dynamism: EU Direct Investment in Asia. Brussels.
16. _. 1996b. Framework Agreement for Trade and Co-operation between the European Community and its Member States, on the One Hand, and the Republic of Korea on the Other. Brussels.
17. DENT, C. M. 1996. "EU-East Asia Economic Relations: Completing the Triangle?" European Dossier Research Paper No. 42. London: European Research Centre.
18. _. 1997a. "Economic Relations between the EU and East Asia: Past, Present, and Future." Intereconomics 32(1):7-13.
19. _. 1997b. The European Economy: The Global Context. London: Routledge.
20. _. 1998a. "The ASEM: Managing the New Framework of the EU's Economic Relations with East Asia." Pacific Affairs 70(4):495-516.
21. _. 1998b. "New Interdependencies in Korea-EU Trade Relations." Journal of Contemporary Asia 28(3):366-89.
22. _. 1998c. "South Korea's Foreign Economic Policy: New Parameters and Problems Examined." Global Economic Review 27(2):59-76.
23. _. 1999. The European Union and East Asia: An Economic Relationship. London: Routledge.
24. _. 2000. "Coming to Terms: The Economic Impact of the East Asian Financial Crisis on the European Union." In Asia-Europe Co-operation after the 1997/98 Asian Turbulence, edited by C. Lee. Aldershot: Ashgate.
25. DENT, C. M., and D. JOHNSON. 2000. "Taiwan-EU Economic Relations: A European Perspective." EurAmerica 30(1):109-57.
26. DJISMAN, S. 1997. "EU-ASEAN Relationship Trends and Issues." In ASEAN in the New Asia, edited by S. Y. Chia and M. Pacini. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
27. DRYSDALE, P. 1991. "Open Regionalism: A Key to East Asia's Economic Future." Pacific Economic Papers No. 197. Australia-Japan Research Centre.
28. DRYSDALE, P., and D. VINES, eds. 1998. Europe, East Asia, and APEC: A Shared Global Agenda? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. FERGUSON, R. J. 1997. "Shaping New Relationships: Asia, Europe, and the New Trilateralism." International Politics 34(4):395-415.
30. FORSTER, A. 1999. "The European Union in Southeast Asia: Continuity and Change in Turbulent Times." International Affairs 75(4):743-58.
31. FRIEDEN, J. A., and D. A. LAKE, eds. 1995. International Political Economy. Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth. London: Routledge.
32. FROBEL, F., J. HEINRICKS, and O. KREYE. 1980. The New International Division of Labor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. GARTEN, G. 1992. A Cold Peace: America, Japan, and Germany and the Struggle for Supremacy. New York: Times Books.
34. GILPIN, R. 1975. US Power and the Multinational Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
35. _. 1984. "The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism." International Organization 38(2):287-304.
36. HAGGARD, S. 1990. Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in Newly Industrializing Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
37. HANSON, B. T. 1998. "What Happened to Fortress Europe? External Trade Policy Liberalization in the European Union." International Organization 52(1):55-85.
38. HART, J. 1992. Rival Capitalists. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
39. HUGHES, B. B. 1996. "The Future of Global Political Economy." International Political Economy: State-Market Relations in the Changing Global Order, edited by C. R. Goddard, J. T. Passe-Smith, and J. G. Conkin. London: Rienner.
40. HUNTINGTON, S. 1993. "Why International Primacy Matters." International Security 17(4):68-83.
41. _. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
42. KENNEDY, P. 1988. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. London: Fontana.
43. KEOHANE, R. O., and J. S. NYE. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little Brown.
44. KIM, B. S., ed. 1997. Europe-East Asia Economic Relations: Current Status and Prospects. Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
45. KINDLEBERGER, C. 1973. The World in Depression: 1929-1939. Berkeley: University of California Press.
46. KRASNER, S. D. 1976. "State Power and the Structure of International Trade." World Politics 28(3):317-48.
47. _. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
48. LUTTWAK, E. 1990. Disarming the World's Economies. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
49. MAULL, H. K., and J. WANANDI. 1998. Europe and the Asia-Pacific. London: Routledge.
50. MOFE. 1997. Towards a New Era of Opportunity: Korea - Partner for Europe in Asia. Seoul: Ministry of Finance and Economy.
51. MORAN, T. 1993. "An Economic Agenda for Neo-Realists." International Security 18(2):211-15.
52. NUTTALL, S. 1996. "Japan and the European Union: Reluctant Partners." Survival 38(2):104-20.
53. O'BRIEN, R., A. M. GOETZ, J. A. SCHOLTE, and M. WILLIAMS. 2000. Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. RAJAN, R. S. 1999. "What Does the Euro Mean for Asia?" Institute for Policy Studies. Singapore. Mimeo.
55. RICHARDS, G., and C. KIRKPATRICK. 1999. "'Reorienting Interregional Cooperation in the Global Political Economy: Europe's East Asian Policy." Journal of Common Market Studies 37(4):683-710.
56. RISSE-KAPPEN, T. 1995. "Structures of Governance and Transnational Relations: What Have We Learned?" In Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions, edited by T. Risse-Kappen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. ROTHACHER, A. 1983. Economic Diplomacy between the EC and Japan, 1959-1981. Aldershot: Gower.
58. SEGAL, G. 1997. "Thinking Strategically about ASEM: The Subsidiarity Question." The Pacific Review 10(1):124-34.
59. SLATER J., and R. STRANGE, eds. 1997. Business Relationships with East Asia: The European Experience. London: Routledge.
60. SMITH, D. A. 1997. "Technology, Commodity Chains, and Global Inequality: South Korea in the 1990s." Review of International Political Economy 4(4):734-62.
61. SMITH, M. 1998. "The European Union and the Asia-Pacific." In Asia-Pacific in the New World Order, edited by A. McGrew and C. Brook. London: Routledge.
62. STRANGE, S. 1987. "The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony." International Organization 41(3):551-74.
63. _. 1994. States and Markets. London: Pinter.
64. _. 1995. "European Business in Japan: A Policy Crossroads?" Journal of Common Market Studies 33(1):1-25.
65. THUROW, L. 1992. Head to Head: The Coming Economic Battle among Japan, Europe, and America. London: Nicholas Brealey.
66. TYSON, L. D. 1992. Who's Bashing Whom? Trade Conflict in High-Technology Industries. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
67. UNCTAD. 1997. Sharing Asia's Dynamism: Asian Direct Investment in the European Union. Geneva: United Nations.
68. WALLERSTEIN, I. 1979. The Capitalist World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. WALTZ, K. N. 1979. The Theory of International Relations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
70. WANG, T. T. 1995. "The Transformation of Mainland China's Economic System in a Bid to Re-Enter GATT." Issues and Studies 31(3):1-19.
71. WONG, J. 1996. "China and the World Trade Organization." Asian Economic Journal 10(3):291-303.
72. WOOLCOCK, S. 1993. "The European Acquis and Multilateral Trade Rules: Are They Compatible?" Journal of Common Market Studies 31:539-58.
73. WURFEL, D., and B. BURTON. 1996. Southeast Asia in the New World Order: The Political Economy of a Dynamic Region. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
74. ZUCKERMAN, M. 1998. "A Second American Century." Foreign Affairs 77(3):18-31.