Implications of basic science research for brain injury rehabilitation: A focus on intact learning mechanisms

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 131-141

  Schmitter Edgecombe, Maureen ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Automatic processes; Automaticity; Cognitive rehabilitation; Controlled processes; Implicit learning; Implicit memory; Skill learning; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; BRAIN INJURY; COGNITION; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEMORY DISORDER; SKILL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ATTENTION; BRAIN INJURIES; HUMANS; LEARNING; MEMORY DISORDERS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 33748113610     PISSN: 08859701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200603000-00006     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (73)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Injury Fact Book 2001-2002. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
2. Langlois JA, Ruthland-Brown W, Tomas KE. Truamatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths. Atlanta GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2004.
3. Finuf P. Reported Traumatic Brain Injuries in Texas. Injury Prevention Control Program. Austin, TX: Texas Department of Health; 1995.
4. Sorenson S, Kraus J. Occurrence, severity, and outcomes of brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1991;6:1-10.
5. Long C, Williams J. Neuropsychological Assessment and Treatment of Head Trauma Patients. Neuropsychological Studies of Non-Focal Brain Damage. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1988.
6. Kraus JF, Sorenson SB. Epidemiology. In: Silver JM, Yudofsky SC, Hales RE, eds. Neuropsychiatry of Traumatic Brain Injury. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1994:3-41.
7. Anderson SI, Wilson CL, McDowell IP, Pentland B, Gray JM, Robertson IH. Late rehabilitation for closed head injury: a follow-up study of patients 1 year from time of discharge. Brain Inj. 1996;10:115-124.
8. Olver JH, Ponsford JL, Curran CA. Outcome following traumatic brain injury: a comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Inj. 1996;10:841-848.
9. Dikmen S, Machamer J, Winn H, Temkin N. Neuropsychological outcome at 1-year post head injury. Neuropsychology. 1995;9:80-90.
10. Wilson, BA. Compensating for cognitive deficits following brain injury. Neuropsychol Rev. 2000;10:233-243.
11. Fisk AD, Ackerman PL, Schneider W. Automatic and controlled processing theory and its applications to human problems. In: Hancock PA, ed. Human Factors Psychology. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1987:159-197.
12. Perma RB, Bekanich M, Williams KR, Boozer, RH. Cognitive rehabilitation: what is the problem? J Cogn Rehabil. 2000;16-21.
13. Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Training use of compensatory memory books: A three stage behavioral approach. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1989;11:871-891.
14. Baddeley AD, Harris J, Sunderland A. Closed head injury and memory. In: Levin HS, Grafman J, Eisenberg HM, eds. Neurobehavioral Recovery From Head Injury. London: Oxford University Press; 1987:295-317.
15. Duke LW, Weathers SL, Caldwell SG, Novack TA. Cognitive rehabilitation after head trauma: toward an integrated cognitive/behavioral perspective on intervention. In: Long CJ, Ross LK, eds. Handbook of Head Trauma: Acute Care to Recovery. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1992:165-190.
16. Hasher L, Zacks RT. Automatic and effortful processes in memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1979;108:356-388.
17. Schneider W, Shiffrin RM. Controlled and automatic human information processing: detection, search, and attention. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:1-66.
18. Shiffrin RM, Schneider W. Controlled and automatic information processing, II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:127-190.
19. Schneider W, Fisk AD. Degree of consistent training and the development of automatic processing. Percept Psychophys. 1982;31:160-168.
20. Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The effects of traumatic brain injury on cognitive performance: in search of an attention deficit hypothesis. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;11:17-30.
21. Schmitter-Edgecombe M. Effects of divided attention on implicit and explicit memory performance following severe closed head injury. Neuropsychology. 1996;10:155-167.
22. Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Marks W, Fahy JF. Semantic priming following severe closed-head trauma: automatic and attentional processes. Neuropsychology. 1993;7:136-148.
23. Vakil E, Biederman Y, Liran G, Groswasser Z, Aberbuch S. Head injured patients and control group: implicit vs. explicit measures of frequency judgment. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994;16:539-546.
24. Greene RL. Word stems as cues in recall and completion tasks. Q J Exp Psychol. 1986;38A:663-674.
25. Glisky EL, Delaney SM. Implicit memory and new semantic learning in posttraumatic amnesia. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;11:31-42.
26. Shum D, Sweeper S, Murray R. Performance on verbal implicit and explicit memory tasks following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;11:43-53.
27. Vakil E, Sigal J. The effect of level of processing on perceptual and conceptual priming: control versus closed-head injured patients. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1997;3:327-336.
28. Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Beglinger B. Acquisition of skilled visual search performance following severe closed-head injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001;7:615-630.
29. Vakil E, Blachstein H, Hoofien D. Automatic temporal order judgment: the effect of intentionality of retrieval on closed-head-injured patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1991;13:291-298.
30. Van Zomeren AH. Reaction Time and Attention After Closed Head Injury. The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers; 1981.
31. Miller E. Simple and choice reaction time following severe head injury. Cortex. 1970;6:121-127.
32. Van Zomeren AH, Deelman, BG. Differential effects of simple and choice reaction time after closed head injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1976;79:81-90.
33. Braun CMJ, Daigneault S, Champagne D. Information processing deficits as indexed by reaction time parameters in severe closed head injury. Int J Clin Neuropsychol. 1989;11:167-178.
34. Brooks DN. Wechsler Memory Scale performance and its relationship to brain damage after severe closed head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975;39:593-601.
35. Gronwall D, Wrightson P. Memory and information processing capacity after closed head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981;43:889-895.
36. Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Nissley HM. Effects of divided attention on automatic and controlled components of memory after severe closed head injury. Neuropsychology. 2000;14:559-569.
37. Roediger HL. Implicit memory: retention without remembering. Am Psychol. 1990;45:1043-1056.
38. Srinivas K, Roediger HL. Classifying implicit memory tests: category association and anagram solution. J Mem Lang. 1990;29:389-412.
39. Jacoby LL. A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. J Mem Lang. 1991;30:513-541.
40. Jacoby LL, Toth JP, Yonelinas AP. Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: measuring recollection. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1993;122:139-154.
41. Anderson JR. Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychol Rev. 1982;89:369-406.
42. Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Rogers WA. Automatic process development following severe closed head injury. Neuropsychology. 1997;11:296-308.
43. Pavawalla S, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. Long-term retention of skilled visual search following severe closed-head injury. Poster presented at: the thirty-third annual meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society; February 2005; Louis, MO.
44. Berry DC, Dienes Z. Implicit Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993.
45. Graf P, Schacter DL. Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1985;11:501-518.
46. Brooks DN. Closed-Head Injury: Psychological, Social and Family Consequences. New York: Oxford University Press; 1984.
47. Crossen B, Novack TA, Trenerry MR, Craig PL. California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) performance in severely head injured and neurologically normal males. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998;10:754-768.
48. Haut MW, Petros TV, Frank RG, Lamberty G. Short-term memory processes following closed head injury. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1990;5:299-309.
49. McDowall J, Martin S. Implicit learning in closed head injury subjects: evidence from an event sequence learning task. N Z J Psychol. 1996;25:2-6.
50. Mutter SA, Howard JH, Howard DV. Serial pattern learning after head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994;16:271-288.
51. Nissley HM, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. Perceptually-based implicit learning in severe closed-head injury patients. Neuropsychology. 2002;16:111-122.
52. Seger CA. Multiple forms of implicit learning. In: Stadler MA, Frensch PA, eds. Handbook of Implicit Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998:295-321.
53. Fahy JF, Marks W, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Long CJ. Dissociations among memory tests after severe closed head injury: systems theory versus a processing account. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1995;1:183.
54. Mulligan NW. Attention and implicit memory tests: the effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming. Mem Cogn. 1997;25:11-17.
55. Mulligan NW, Hartman M. Divided attention and indirect memory tests. Mem Cogn. 1996;24:453-465.
56. Schmitter-Edgecombe M. Effects of divided attention on perceptual and conceptual memory tests: an analysis using a process-dissociation approach. Mem Cogn. 1999;27:512-525.
57. McCauley S, Hannay HJ, Swank PR. Use of the disability rating scale recovery curve as a predictor of psychosocial outcome following closed-head injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001;7:457-467.
58. Levin HS, Gray HE, Eisenberg HM. Neurobehavioral outcome 1 year after severe head injury: experience of the traumatic coma data bank. J Neurosurg. 1990;73:699-709.
59. Kapur N, Glisky EL, Wilson BA. Technological memory aids for people with memory deficits. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2004;14:41-60.
60. Riley GA, Heaton S. Guidelines for the selection of a method of fading cues. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2000;10:133-149.
61. Glisky EL, Schacter DL. Remediation of organic disorders: current status and future perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1986;1:54-63.
62. Glisky EL, Schacter DL. Acquisition of domain-specific knowledge in patients with organic memory disorders. J Learn Disabil. 1988;21:333-351.
63. Glisky EL, Schacter DL, Tulving E. Learning and retention of computer-related vocabulary in amnesic patients: method of vanishing cues. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1986;8:292-312.
64. Glisky EL. Acquisition and transfer of word processing skill by an amnesic patient. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1995;5:299-318.
65. Terrace HS. Discrimination learning with and without "errors." J Exp Anal Behav. 1963;6:1-27.
66. Wilson BA. Towards a comprehensive model of cognitive rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2002;12:97-110.
67. Baddeley AD, Wilson BA. When implicit memory fails: amnesia and the problem of error elimination. Neuropsychologia. 1994;32:53-68.
68. Wilson B, Baddeley AD, Evans JJ, Shiel A. Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impaired people. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1994;4:307-326.
69. Wilson BA, Evans JJ. Error-free learning in the rehabilitation of people with memory impairments. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;12:54-64.
70. Squires EJ, Hunkin NM, Parkin AJ. Errorless learning of novel associations in amnesia. Neuropsychologia. 1997;35:1103-1111.
71. Page M, Wilson BA, Norris D, Shiel A, Carter G. Familiarity and recollection in errorless learning. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001;7:413.
72. Riley GA, Dimitra S, Jaspal S. Which is more effective in promoting implicit and explicit memory: the method of vanishing cues or errorless learning without fading? Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2004;14:257-283.
73. Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Fahy JF, Whelan JP, Long CJ. Memory remediation after severe closed-head injury: notebook training versus supportive therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995;63:484-489.