A prospective comparison of 3 new-generation pulse oximetry devices during ambulation after open heart surgery

Respiratory Care

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 29-35

  Richards, Nancy M ^a,c   Giuliano, Karen K ^b   Jones, Philip G ^a  

^a SAINT LUKE S MID AMERICA HEART INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^c ST LUKE S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Monitoring; Oximetry; Postoperative complications; Sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERIAL OXYGEN SATURATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENIENCE SAMPLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DEVICE; FEMALE; FINGER; HEART RATE; HOSPITAL BED CAPACITY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILIZATION; NON PROFIT HOSPITAL; OPEN HEART SURGERY; OXYGEN SATURATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE OXIMETRY; RANDOMIZATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TEACHING HOSPITAL; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY CARE UNIT; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; HEART SURGERY; INSTRUMENTATION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; OXIMETRY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; RECOVERY ROOM; STATISTICS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIAC CARE FACILITIES; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; EARLY AMBULATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; EVALUATION STUDIES; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXIMETRY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECOVERY ROOM;

EID: 33748112760     PISSN: 00201324     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Severinghaus J, Kelleher J. Recent developments in pulse oximetry. Anesthesiology 1992;76(6):1018-1038.
2. Severinghaus JW, Astrup P. History of blood gas analysis VI: Oximetry. J Clin Monit 1986;2(4):270-288.
3. Bohnhorst B, Peter CS, Poets CF. Pulse oximeters' reliability in detecting hypoxemia and bradycardia: comparison between a conventional and two new generation oximeters. Crit Care Med 2000;28(5):1565-1568.
4. Brouillette R, Lavergne J, Leimanis A, Nixon GM, Ladan S, McGregor CD. Differences in pulse oximetry technology can affect detection of sleep-disordered breathing in children. Anesth Analg 2002;94(1 Suppl):S47-S53.
5. Durbin CG, Rostow SK. Advantages of new technology pulse oximetry with adults in extremis. Anesth Analg 2002;94(1 Suppl):S81-S83.
6. Durbin CG, Rostow SK. More reliable oximetry reduces the frequency of arterial blood gas analyses and hastens oxygen weaning after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized trial of a new technology. Crit Care Med 2002;30(8):1735-1740.
7. Hay WW, Rodden DJ, Collins SM, Melara DL, Hale KA, Fashaw LM. Reliability of conventional and new generation pulse oximetry in neonatal patients. J Perinatol 2002;22(5):360-366.
8. Kopotic RJ, Lindner W. Assessing high-risk infants in the delivery room with pulse oximetry. Anesth Analg 2002;94(1 Suppl):S31-S36.
9. Lutter NO, Urankar S, Kroeber S. False alarm rates of three third-generation pulse oximeters in PACU, ICU, and IABP patients. Anesth Analg 2002;94(1 Suppl):S69-S75.
10. Malviya S, Reynolds PI, Voepel-Lewis T, Siewert M, Watson D, Tait AR, et al. False alarms and sensitivity of conventional pulse oximetry versus the Masimo SET technology in the pediatric post-anesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg 2000;90(6):1336-1340.
11. Wouters PF, Gehring H, Meyfroidt G, Ponz L, Gil-Rodriguez J, Hornberger C, et al. Accuracy of pulse oximeters: the European multi-center trial. Anesth Analg 2002;94(1 Suppl):S13-S16.
12. Rheineck-Leyssius AT, Kalkman CJ. Advanced pulse oximeter signal processing technology compared to simple signal averaging. II. Effect on frequency of alarms in the post anesthesia care unit J Clin Anesth 1999;11(3):196-200.
13. Rheineck-Leyssius AT, Kalkman CJ. Advanced pulse oximeter signal processing technology compared to simple averaging. I. Effect on frequency of alarms in the operating room J Clin Anesth 1999;11(3):192-195.
14. Giuliano KK, Higgins TL. New-generation pulse oximetry in the care of critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care 2005;14(1):26-37.
15. Westfall P. Multiple testing of general contrasts using logical constraints and correlations. J Am Stat Assoc 1997;92:299-336.
16. Bretz F, Genz A, Hothorn LA. On the numerical availability of multiple comparison procedures. Biometrical J 2001;43(5):64-66.
17. Meredith C, Edworthy J. Are there too many alarms in the intensive care unit? An overview of the problems. J Adv Nurs 1995;21(1):15-20.
18. Ries AL, Prewitt LM, Johnson JJ. Skin color and ear oximetry. Chest 1989;96(2):287-290.