Contingent negative variation (CNV) in the detection of deception task using a serial presentation of pictures

Japanese Journal of Psychology

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 149-155

  Hira, Shinji ^a   Matsuda, Takashi ^b  

^a Forensic Science Laboratory   (Japan)

^b HIROSHIMA SHUDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Contingent negative variation; Detection of deception; Picture; Psychological completion; Serial presentation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RECUMBENCY;

ADULT; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DECEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 0032082358     PISSN: 00215236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.69.149     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. 1990 Theories and applications in the detection of deception. New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Boaz, T. L., Perry, N. W., Raney, G., Fischler, I. S., & Shuman, D. 1991 Detection of guilty knowledge with event-related potentials. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 788-795.
3. Delse, F. C., Marsh, G. R., & Thompson, L. W. 1972 CNV correlates of task difficulty and accuracy of pitch discrimination. Psychophysiology, 9, 53-62.
4. Elaad, E., & Ben-Shakhar, G. 1989 Effects of motivation and verbal response type on psychophysiological detection of information. Psychophysiology, 26, 442-451.
5. Farwell, L. A., & Donchin, E. 1991 The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 531-547.
6. Geisser, S., & Greenhouse, S. W. 1958 An extension of Box's results on the use of the F distribution in multivariate analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 885-891.
7. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. 1983 A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468-484.
8. Gustafson, L. A., & Orne, M. T. 1963 Effects of heightened motivation on the detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 408-411.
9. Loveless, N. E., & Sanford, A. J. 1975 The impact of warning signal intensity on reaction time and components of the contingent negative variation. Biological Psychology, 2, 217-226.
10. Lykken, D. T. 1974 Psychology and the lie detector industry. American Psychologist, 29, 725-739.
11. Podlesny, J. A., & Raskin, D. C. 1977 Physiological measures and the detection of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 782-799.
12. Rosenfeld, J. P., Cantwell, B., Nasman, V. T., Wojdac, V., Ivanov, S., & Mazzeri, L. 1988 A modified, event-related potential-based guilty knowledge test. International Journal of Neuroscience, 42, 157-161.
13. Roth, W. T., Rothbart, R. M., & Kopell, B. S. 1978 The timing of CNV resolution in a memory retrieval task. Biological Psychology, 6, 39-49.