The floral scales in Hellmuthia (Cyperaceae, Cyperoideae) and Paramapania (Cyperaceae, Mapanioideae): An ontogenetic study

Annals of Botany

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 619-630

  Vrijdaghs, A ^a   Goetghebeur, P ^b   Smets, E ^c   Muasya, A M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN BRANCH   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Cyperaceae; Floral ontogeny; Floral scales; Hellmuthia; Homology; Paramapania; SEM

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; FLORAL TRAIT; FLOWER; ONTOGENY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYPERACEAE; FLOWER; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

CYPERACEAE; FLOWERS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING;

CYPERACEAE; FICINIA; HELLMUTHIA; HELLMUTHIA MEMBRANACEA; ISOLEPIS;

EID: 33748076459     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl138     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bruhl JJ. 1995. Sedge genera of the world: relationships and a new classification of the Cyperaceae. Australian Journal of Botany 8: 125-305.
2. Clarke CB. 1897-98. Cyperaceae. In: Thiselton-Dyer WT, ed. Flora Capensis, Vol. 7. London: Reeve, 266-524.
3. Clarke CB. 1909. Illustrations of Cyperaceae. London: Williams & Norgate.
4. Erdtman G. 1966. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angiosperms. New York, NY: Hafner.
5. Fernandez I. 1987. Contribucion al conocimiento palinologico de Cyperaceae. Acta Botànica Malacitana 12: 173-182.
6. Goebel K. 1888. Über den Bau der Ärchen und Blüten einiger Javanischer Cyperaceen. Annales du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 7: 120-140.
7. Goetghebeur P. 1986. Genera Cyperacearum. Een bijdrage tot de kennis van de morfologie, systematiek en fylogenese van de Cyperaceae-genera. PhD Thesis, Groep Plantkunde, Rijksuniversiteit Gent, Gent.
8. Goetghebeur P. 1998. Cyperaceae. In: Kubitzki K. ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 4. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 141-190.
9. Haines RW, Lye KA. 1976. Studies in African Cyperaceae. XIV. The genus Hellmuthia Steud. Botaniska Notiser 129: 61-68.
10. Haines RW, Lye KA. 1983. The sedges and rushes of East Africa. Nairobi, Kenya: East African National History Society.
11. Holttum RE. 1948. The spikelet in Cyperaceae. Botanical Review 14: 525-541.
12. Koyama T. 1969. Delimitation and classification of the Cyperaceae-Mapanioideae. In: Gunkel JE, ed. Current topics in plant science. New York: Academic Press, 201-228.
13. Kukkonen I. 1984. On the inflorescence structure in the family Cyperaceae. Annales Botanici Fennici 21: 257-264.
14. Kunth CS. 1837. Enumeratio plantarum. 2. Cyperographia synoptica. Stutgart: Colla.
15. Muasya MA. 1998. A synopsis of Fuirena (Cyperaceae) for the flora of Tropical East Africa. Kew Bulletin 53: 187-202.
16. Muasya AM, Simpson DA. 2002. A monograph of the genus Isolepis R. Br. (Cyperaceae). Kew Bulletin 57: 257-362.
17. Muasya AM, Simpson DA, Culham A, Chase MW. 1998. An assessment of suprageneric phylogeny in Cyperaceae using rbcL DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 211: 257-271.
18. Muasya AM, Bruhl JJ, Simpson DA, Culham A, Chase MW. 2000. Suprageneric phylogeny of Cyperaceae: a combined analysis. In: Wilson KL, Morrison DA, eds. Monocots: systematics and evolution. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: CSIRO, 593-601.
19. Muasya AM, Vrijdaghs A, Simpson DA, Chase MW, Goetghebeur P, Smets E. 2006. What is a genus in Cypereae: phylogeny, chareacter homology assessment and generic circumscription. Botanical Review (in press).
20. Nees von Esenbeck CG. 1835. Uebersicht der Cyperaceengattungen. Linnaea 9: 273-306.
21. Richards JH, Bruhl JJ, Wilson KL. 2006. Flower or spikelet? - Understanding the morphology and development of reproductive structures in Exocarya (Cyperaceae, Mapanioideae, Chrysitricheae). American Journal of Botany (in press).
22. Schönland S. 1922. South African Cyperaceae. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa 3.
23. Schultze-Motel W. 1959. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche und vergleichendmorphologische Untersuchungen im Blütenbereich der Cyperaceae. Englers Botanische Jahrbuch der Systematischen Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 78: 129-170.
24. Simpson DA, Furness CA, Hodkinson TR, Muasya AM, Chase MW. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in Cyperaceae subfamily Mapanioideae inferred from pollen and plastid DNA sequence data. American Journal of Botany 90: 1071-1086.
25. Simpson DA, Muasya AM, Alves M, Bruhl JJ, Dhooge S, Chase MW, et al. 2006. Phylogeny of Cyperaceae based on DNA sequence data - a new rbcL analysis. In: Monocots III/Grasses IV. Claremont, CA: ALISO, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden (in press).
26. Steudel EG. 1855. Synopsis plantarum glumacearum 2. Cyperographia synoptica. Stuttgart: Metzler.
27. Thunberg PC. 1794. Prodromus Plantarum Capensis. Uppsala.
28. Vrijdaghs A, Goetghebeur P, Muasya AM, Smets E, Caris P. 2004. The nature of the perianth in Fuirena (Cyperaceae). South African Journal of Botany 70: 587-594.
29. Vrijdaghs A, Caris P, Goetghebeur P, Smets E. 2005a. Floral Ontogeny in Scirpus, Eriophorum, and Dulichium (Cyperaceae), with special reference to the perianth. Annals of Botany 95: 1199-1209.
30. Vrijdaghs A, Goethgebeur P, Smets E. 2005b. Homology problems in cyperoid flowers: a floral ontogenetic approach. In: XVII International Botanical Congress, Abstracts. Vienna, Austria, 219.
31. Vrijdaghs A, Goetghebeur P, Muasya AM, Caris P, Smets E. 2005c. Floral ontogeny in Ficinia Schrad. and Isolepis R.Br. (Cyperaceae), with focus on the nature and origin of the gynophore. Annals of Botany 96: 1247-1264.
32. Vrijdaghs A, Muasya AM, Goetghebeur P, Caris P, Nagels A, Smets E. 2006. A floral ontogenetic approach to homology questions within the Cyperoideae (Cyperaceae). Botanical Review (in press).
33. Wichelen J, Camelbeke K, Chaerle P, Goetghebeur P, Huysmnans S. 1999. Comparison of different treatments of LM and SEM studies and systematic value of pollen grains in Cyperaceae. Grana 38: 50-58.