Response of dry bean and weeds to fomesafen and fomesafen tank mixtures

Weed Technology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 201-206

  Wilson, Robert G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Field beans; Interference; Seed yield

Indexed keywords

CROP DAMAGE; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; HERBICIDE; LEGUME; WEED CONTROL;

AMARANTHUS RETROFLEXUS; CHENOPODIUM ALBUM; KOCHIA; PORTULACA OLERACEA; SOLANUM PHYSALIFOLIUM;

EID: 33748074459     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-04-166R     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bailey, W. A., H. P. Wilson, and T. E. Hines. 2003. Weed control and snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) response to reduced rates of fomesafen. Weed Technol. 17:269-275.
2. Balyan, R. S. and R. K. Malik. 1989. Control of horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum) and barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in mung bean (Vigna radiata). Weed Sci. 37:695-699.
3. Cobucci, T., H. T. Prates, C. M. Falcao, and M. V. Rezende. 1998. Effect of imazamox, fomesafen, and acifluorfen soil residue on rotational crops. Weed Sci. 46:258-263.
4. Dawson, J. J. 1964. Competition between irrigated field beans and annual weeds. Weeds 12:206-208.
5. Foes, M. J., L. X. Liu, P. J. Tranel, L. M. Wax, and E. W. Stoller. 1998. A biotype of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistant to triazine and ALS herbicides. Weed Sci. 46:514-520.
6. Gomez, K. A. and A. A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical procedures for agriculture research. New York: John Wiley. 680 p.
7. Hein, G. L., S. T. Kamble, W. Voorhees, and W. Waggoner. 1992. Pesticide use on Specialty Crops in Nebraska. Institute of Agricultural and National Resources University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Pp. 4-7.
8. Hinz, R., Jr. and M.D.K. Owen. 1997. Acetolactate synthase resistance in a common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) population. Weed Technol. 11: 13-19.
9. Sweat, J. K., M. J. Horak, D. E. Peterson, R. W. Lloyd, and J. E. Boyer. 1998. Herbicide efficacy on four Amaranthus species in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12:315-321.
10. Unland, R. D., K. Al-Khalib, and D. E. Peterson. 1999. Interactions between imazamox and diphenylethers. Weed Sci. 47:462-466.
11. Urwin, C. P., R. G. Wilson, and D. A. Mortensen. 1996. Late season weed suppression from dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars. Weed Technol. 10:699-704.
12. Wiehert, R. A., R. Bozsa, R. E. Talbert, and L. R. Oliver. 1992. Temperature and relative humidity effects on diphenylether herbicides. Weed Technol. 6:19-24.
13. Wilson, R. G. 1993. Wild proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) interference in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci. 41:607-610.
14. Wilson, R. G. and S. D. Miller. 1991. Dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) response to imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 5:22-26.
15. Wilson, R. G. and J. A. Smith. 2002. Influence of harvest-aid herbicides on dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) desiccation, seed yield, and quality. Weed Technol. 16:109-115.
16. Wilson, R. G., G. A. Wicks, and C. R. Fenster. 1980. Weed control in field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Western Nebraska. Weed Sci. 28:295-299.