Weed control and snap bean (phaseolus vulgaris) response to reduced rates of fomesafen

Weed Technology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 269-275

  Bailey, William A ^b   Wilson, Henry P ^b   Hines, Thomas E ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Fomesafen linear effect; Net returns; Snap bean yield

Indexed keywords

AMBROSIA; AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA; CHENOPODIUM ALBUM; PHASEOLUS VULGARIS; POACEAE;

EID: 27644520879     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0890-037X(2003)017[0269:WCASBP]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ahrens, W. H., ed. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 64-65.
2. Alexander, S. A., J. S. Caldwell, H. E. Hohlt, B. A. Nault, C. R. O'Dell, S. B. Sterrett, and H. P. Wilson. 2001. Plant nutrient recommendations based on soil tests for vegetable crop production. In H. E. Hehlt, ed. Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendations. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech Extension Publication 456-420. p. 26.
3. Anonymous. 2001a. Section 18 Emergency Use Permit for Reflex in Snap Bean. Richmond, VA: Virginia Department of Agriculture.
4. Anonymous. 2001b. Reflex Product Label. Wilmington, DE: Zeneca. 5 p.
5. Bailey, W. A., H. P. Wilson, and T. E. Hines. 2001. Weed management in snap bean with fomesafen. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:125.
6. Bauer, T. A., K. A. Renner, and D. Penner. 1995. Response of selected weed species to postemergence imazethapyr and bentazon. Weed Technol. 9: 236-242.
7. Bellinder, R. R. 1990. Alternative weed control programs for snap beans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:69.
8. Bellinder, R. R., M. Arsenovic, J. J. Kirkwyland, and R. W. Wallace. 1998. Evaluating the EPA's comparative product performance testing guidelines for herbicides in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 12:215-222.
9. Bellinder, R. R., R. W. Wallace, and G. L. Jordan. 1997. English pea (Pisum sativum) tolerance to paraquat and paraquat plus bentazon. Weed Technol. 11:39-44.
10. Comeau, G. R., R. R. Bellinder, and M. Orfanedes. 1994. Effects of surfactants on fomesafen and bentazon injury in snap and dry beans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:103.
11. Frans, R. R., R. Talbert, D. Marx, and H. Crowley. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant response to weed control practices. In N. D. Camper, ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society. pp. 37-38.
12. Glancey, J. L., W. E. Kee, and T. L. Wooten. 1997. Machine harvesting of lima beans for processing. J. Veg. Crop Prod. 3:59-68.
13. Glancey, J. L., W. E. Kee, T. L. Wooten, and B. C. Postles. 1995. Harvesting of Green Peas and Lima Beans for Processing. Proceedings of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers Annual Meeting Paper 95-1773. Chicago, IL: American Society of Agriculture.
14. Harris, J. R., B. J. Gossett, T. R. Murphy, and J. E. Toler. 1991. Response of broadleaf weeds and soybeans to the diphenyl ether herbicides. J. Prod. Agric. 4:407-410.
15. Jones, D. S., H. Lin, and M. V. Kane. 1990. Reducing herbicide rates for early-maturing soybean cultivars. In 1990 Agronomy Abstracts. Madison, WI: ASA. p. 147.
16. Little, D. L., R. D. Ilnicki, and M. W. Beale. 1984. Postemergence combinations of fomesafen with fluazifop, bentazon, or acifluorfen for weed control in soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:20-26.
17. Manheimer, S. 2001. Virginia Agricultural Statistics. Richmond, VA: National Agricultural Statistics Service. p. 54.
18. Prostko, E. P. and J. A. Meade. 1993. Reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in conventional soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 7:365-369.
19. Rauch, B., R. Bellinder, and A. Miller. 2001. Evaluating fomesafen control of common ragweed in beans when considering carryover potential. Proc. Northeast. Weed. Sci. Soc. 55:124.
20. Roggenbuck, F. C., L. Rowe, D. Penner, L. Petroff, and R. Burow. 1990. Increasing postemergence herbicide efficacy and rainfastness with silicon adjuvants. Weed Technol. 4:576-580.
21. Rose, R. P. and J. Riabov. 1985. Today's herbicide: reflex 2LC herbicide-a new postemergence broadleaf weed herbicide for soybeans. Weeds Today 16:5.
22. Sankula, S., M. J. VanGessel, and K. L. Everts. 1999. Impact of weed density and pod rot on lima bean yield and quality. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:73.
23. [SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, 4th ed, Volume 2. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 846 p.
24. Schepps, A. L. and R. A. Ashley. 1985. Weed-snap bean competition for light. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:77-79.
25. Steel, R.G.D., J. H. Torrie, and D. A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill. 666 p.
26. Sturt, S. G., III. 2000. Crop Enterprise Cost Analysis for the Eastern Shore of Virginia. Dinwiddie, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute. pp. 29-31.
27. Sweet, R. D. 1986. Life History Studies as Related to Weed Control in the Northeast. 9. Galinsoga. Ithaca, NY: Northeast Regional, Cornell University. 34 p.
28. VanGessel, M. J., D. W. Monks, and Q. R. Johnson. 2000. Herbicides for potential use in lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) production. Weed Technol. 14:279-286.
29. Waller, N. and B. Richardson. 2000. Marketing Virginia Potatoes and Vegetables. Richmond, VA: Virginia Market News Service. 20 p.